Originally posted by statman
View Post
Official FIFA South Africa World Cup Thread
Collapse
X
-
-
It was a free kick, Donavon placed it perfectly in the box and Edu put it in. The official called offsides to negate the goal. I don't think there was an offsides at all and that was very questionable. There were also two U.S. players being held on the kick. One was drug down by a defender.Originally posted by jay santos View PostWhat exactly happened on the play?"Take it to the Bank"
Comment
-
It sounded on the broadcast like he actually called a foul. That they initially thought offsides, but that he called a foul on the U.S. don't know if that is actually the case, but it seems like it was what was called.Originally posted by Hot Lunch View PostIt was a free kick, Donavon placed it perfectly in the box and Edu put it in. The official called offsides to negate the goal. I don't think there was an offsides at all and that was very questionable. There were also two U.S. players being held on the kick. One was drug down by a defender."They're good. They've always been good" - David Shaw.
Well, because he thought it was good sport. Because some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money. They can't be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.
Comment
-
So the call was a foul on the U.S? If that is the case then I will be even more upset than I already am and just might start a riot or a revolution. Whichever makes more noise.Originally posted by DrumNFeather View PostIt sounded on the broadcast like he actually called a foul. That they initially thought offsides, but that he called a foul on the U.S. don't know if that is actually the case, but it seems like it was what was called."Take it to the Bank"
Comment
-
Originally posted by DrumNFeather View PostIt sounded on the broadcast like he actually called a foul. That they initially thought offsides, but that he called a foul on the U.S. don't know if that is actually the case, but it seems like it was what was called.IIRC there was no explanation for the call whatsoever. There was no flag indicating offside, so unless the ref made that call without the help of his side officials, then he must have called a foul on the U.S., which of course is ridiculous. At least 2 U.S. players were fouled themselves, but regardless they should have been given the advantage and the goal should stand.Originally posted by Hot Lunch View PostSo the call was a foul on the U.S? If that is the case then I will be even more upset than I already am and just might start a riot or a revolution. Whichever makes more noise.
After that play I am suddenly a proponent of instant replay in soccer. I hope that ref is removed from further officiating duties at the world cup. Horrible call.Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.
Dig your own grave, and save!
"The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American
"I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
I just read that they called a foul on Edu which is complete Booshit. Very disappointing. I am going to start a riot in Provo in a few minutes. Anyone want to join me?Originally posted by falafel View PostIIRC there was no explanation for the call whatsoever. There was no flag indicating offside, so unless the ref made that call without the help of his side officials, then he must have called a foul on the U.S., which of course is ridiculous. At least 2 U.S. players were fouled themselves, but regardless they should have been given the advantage and the goal should stand.
After that play I am suddenly a proponent of instant replay in soccer. I hope that ref is removed from further officiating duties at the world cup. Horrible call."Take it to the Bank"
Comment
-
I am pretty sure it was a foul on Bradley. I mean phantom foul.Originally posted by Hot Lunch View PostSo the call was a foul on the U.S? If that is the case then I will be even more upset than I already am and just might start a riot or a revolution. Whichever makes more noise."Nobody listens to Turtle."-Turtlesigpic
Comment
-
Damn Bradley. He kept forcing his body between that defender's circled arms. Leave that defender alone already!Originally posted by Surfah View PostI am pretty sure it was a foul on Bradley. I mean phantom foul.
Btw, that was a freakin' awesome goal by Bradley.Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.
Dig your own grave, and save!
"The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American
"I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
-
It's impossible for one ref trying on a corner kick trying to watch 16 guys push, grab, punch each other for position and try to make sense of it. Instant replay, additional ref's on the field. I'm not sure of the perfect solution, but it needs something.Originally posted by falafel View PostIIRC there was no explanation for the call whatsoever. There was no flag indicating offside, so unless the ref made that call without the help of his side officials, then he must have called a foul on the U.S., which of course is ridiculous. At least 2 U.S. players were fouled themselves, but regardless they should have been given the advantage and the goal should stand.
After that play I am suddenly a proponent of instant replay in soccer. I hope that ref is removed from further officiating duties at the world cup. Horrible call.
Comment
-
Definitely needs something. For that call though you would have need 2 or 3 extra refs.Originally posted by jay santos View PostIt's impossible for one ref trying on a corner kick trying to watch 16 guys push, grab, punch each other for position and try to make sense of it. Instant replay, additional ref's on the field. I'm not sure of the perfect solution, but it needs something.Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.
Dig your own grave, and save!
"The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American
"I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
German TV commentors said there never was any explanation of the call. The ref immediately waved off the goal without a reason why.Originally posted by falafel View PostIIRC there was no explanation for the call whatsoever. There was no flag indicating offside, so unless the ref made that call without the help of his side officials, then he must have called a foul on the U.S., which of course is ridiculous. At least 2 U.S. players were fouled themselves, but regardless they should have been given the advantage and the goal should stand.
After that play I am suddenly a proponent of instant replay in soccer. I hope that ref is removed from further officiating duties at the world cup. Horrible call.
There was no US offsides.
There was no obvious US foul (although there were two clear Slovenian fouls).
There was no clear call.
It brings a Russian-figure-skating-judge feel to the World Cup...
Comment
-
Totally agree. If we were England we'd be rioting in the streets. This is horrible.Originally posted by statman View PostGerman TV commentors said there never was any explanation of the call. The ref immediately waved off the goal without a reason why.
There was no US offsides.
There was no obvious US foul (although there were two clear Slovenian fouls).
There was no clear call.
It brings a Russian-figure-skating-judge feel to the World Cup...Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.
Dig your own grave, and save!
"The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American
"I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
How about a 'no call'? That would've been perfect. Especially since there's really no evidence that the team he penalized did anything wrong.Originally posted by jay santos View PostIt's impossible for one ref trying on a corner kick trying to watch 16 guys push, grab, punch each other for position and try to make sense of it. Instant replay, additional ref's on the field. I'm not sure of the perfect solution, but it needs something.
German sports media are really pissed off about the refs right now. They're saying that Klose's elimination ensured the German loss, and although they say both yellows were individually borderline as yellows (they don't really argue that either of the calls were wrong individually), they're arguing that his overall play didn't deserve a double-yellow elimination. But they think Schwansteiger should have been kicked-out and wasn't. And they think the US really got screwed.
Comment
Comment