Originally posted by Goatnapper'96
View Post
First, I think the Utah job has always been considered a pretty good one. It has a good tradition and good facilities (the Huntsman Center will be the largest in the PAC12 - I hope there will be fannies in the seats again some day). One reason we wound up with Giacoletti is that it was hard to find someone willing to succeed Majerus. That is usually an issue after the departure of a very successful and iconic coach, and it was after Majerus. I understand Chris Hill really wanted Lon Kruger, and I also understand Kruger looked hard at the job.
Second, the college hoops world has changed a lot. I heard Hill tell a group I was in that whereas in the past, a coach working for a "low mid-major" school like Ball State needed to take WAC (now MWC) job on his way up to a top-tier job like UCLA or Indiana or [insert school]. Hill says that now, a coach can jump directly to the big time from a smaller program. That makes it much tougher to get really talented coaches for a MWC program. That is an interesting analysis and it does have the ring of truth. For example, San Diego State now has Fisher, who is doing well, but he was someone who failed in a Big 10 program. Hill has always refused to hire a coach like that who is "on the way down."
Third, after Giac ran the program down, Boylen was the best Hill could do. A commentary, I think, on the Utah program's diminished status specifically and also on the changing job market for head coaches.
So there is ground for hope that in the PAC12 Utah will be able to attract coaches who are looking more for a "destination" job. No, Utah won't ever be the top destination in the PAC12 but it won't have the dreaded mid-major label anymore.* There's reason to hope the program will resuscitate. At least that's my story - and I'm stickin' to it.
In response to Donuthole's question below about head coaching experience, I think the skills required for being a head coach are different than those that make a good assistant. Giac had HC experience but just ended up not being up to the job. (His record as a head coach wasn't all that great either. He was not Hill first choice, probably for that reason.) I think Boylen is probably a great assistant but he doesn't seem to have the extra something that a HC needs- maybe it's the ability to see the big picture and then bring it to pass. That's why I think Utah needs someone who has succeeded as a HC somewhere else.
Originally posted by myboynoah
View Post
*I think BYU loses the label too, by going independent.

Comment