Tweet
Originally posted by imanihonjin
View Post
-
"...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte -
Past behavior is the best indicator of future performance.Originally posted by Northwestcoug View PostComment
-
I won't post this on cougarboard, but this site is mature enough to handle it without crashing. Basically it's saying Trump's unhinged nature in responding to things he doesn't like (like an impeachment inquiry) is eventually going to do him in.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world...SAX?li=BBoPU0RComment
-
lol. You mean people on cougarboard are generally low I.Q. and defend Trump to the hilt when given the opportunity?Originally posted by BlueK View Post"I'm anti, can't no government handle a commando / Your man don't want it, Trump's a bitch! I'll make his whole brand go under,"Comment
-
we are known for being very mature, take DB's links for example.Comment
-
As the/a resident CB type, I will say that I find nothing surprising or objectionable in this article. In fact, I agree with it.Originally posted by BlueK View PostPLesa excuse the tpyos.Comment
-
-
That's funny.Originally posted by creekster View Post"There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creeksterComment
-
I've always thought of creekster as our resident cranky bastard type.
Comment
-
Isn’t that what CB stands for?Originally posted by YOhio View PostI've always thought of creekster as our resident cranky bastard type.PLesa excuse the tpyos.Comment
-
Fake libertarians are the worst libertarians:
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...-whistleblowerSen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said this week that the whistleblower at the center of the impeachment inquiry against President Trump should "come forward," given the fallout from their complaint."...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUteComment
-
OMG, Rand Paul is right... it looks like the whistleblower F'd up:
"If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!Comment
-
Yes! By all means, let’s find a way to get Trump off on a technicality.Originally posted by Uncle Ted View Post"There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creeksterComment
-
Its pretty standard that whistleblowers needs to raise their concerns in-house first before going outside. But none of this is really important to the impeachment issue. The lack of whistleblower protection just means that the whistleblower can't sue if he is fired for blowing the whistle. It doesn't mean that the exposed conduct is suddenly okay.Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View PostAin't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.
Dig your own grave, and save!
"The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American
"I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!Comment
-
No one is suggesting that. You are conflating issues. The allegedly impeachable conduct was demanding a quid pro quo from Ukraine by asking for assistance in investigating Biden in exchange for not holding up military aid. A second issue is whether the whistleblower or Schiff or the Senate intel committee manipulated the process in bringing this to the nation's attention. If it turns out the whistleblower is not entitled to anonymity under the pertinent statutes (ignoring for now the implicit suggestion by Rand that because the purpose for anonymity is gone so should the anonymity itself go away) then his/her identity should be made public, especially if this is political grandstanding. If the whistleblower loses anonymity it will have no legal impact in determining whether Trump committed an impeachable offense.Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
Trump acted very poorly. But Schiff is as big of a clown and has been almost as bad. A pox on both their houses.PLesa excuse the tpyos.Comment
Comment