Originally posted by Uncle Ted
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
President Trump: Making America Great Again...
Collapse
X
-
That is outrageous! I wish he'd side with the republicans on raising our debt ceiling instead!Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.
Dig your own grave, and save!
"The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American
"I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
-
Whoa, shades of libertarianism that I hadn't noticed in falafel before...Originally posted by falafel View PostThat is outrageous! I wish he'd side with the republicans on raising our debt ceiling instead!"...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
Comment
-
Didnt Obama over reach? I thought so then. Did you not agree? You think hte exec order was A-OK?Originally posted by Commando View PostSo Trump ended DACA under the guise that, without a hint of irony, Obama was over-reaching in his executive power. So if you're on the Trump Train still please do us a favor and just admit that this guy is a giant evil piece of shit. Stop the whatabouts and the butObamas. Just gaze at that lumpy, peanutty lump of shit in the Oval Office and call a spade a spade.
http://www.nola.com/opinions/index.s...ump_obama.html
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/fl...rticle/2633412PLesa excuse the tpyos.
Comment
-
No... Obama didn't over reach. He said it was temporary stop gap measure:Originally posted by creekster View PostDidnt Obama over reach? I thought so then. Did you not agree? You think hte exec order was A-OK?
http://www.nola.com/opinions/index.s...ump_obama.html
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/fl...rticle/2633412
Now, let's be clear -- this is not amnesty, this is not immunity. This is not a path to citizenship. It's not a permanent fix. This is a temporary stopgap measure that lets us focus our resources wisely while giving a degree of relief and hope to talented, driven, patriotic young people
If Obama said it was not temporary then I might agree with you about over reaching. In short, Obama was just trying to help congress get their sh*t together on immigration. Maybe Drumpf is helping Obama keep his word just like any other good fellow democrat would do."If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Uncle Ted View PostMaybe he will fire Pence and make Hillary his VP.
I know Trump loves firing people, but Mike Pence is one person he can't fire. Congress would have to remove him. They would also have to approve any new appointee, so unless the republican congress also comes out of the closet....
Comment
-
Originally posted by creekster View PostDidnt Obama over reach? I thought so then. Did you not agree? You think hte exec order was A-OK?
Yep- many conservatives don't agree with me, but technically he didn't create a law at all. It was an executive act of prosecutorial discretion for folks under certain stringent guidelines, which he can do since DHS is run under the executive's direction. Congress had already authorized work permits for those benefitting from grants of prosecutorial discretion. Obama did it so that the dreamers didn't get put over a barrel because of Boener's refusal to put the Dream Act to a vote before the House. Trump rescinding that particular set of enforcement priorities just says, "OK we know you're basically perfect but you're also mainly brown, so Sessions, Breitbart and I say 'f*k you guys.'""I'm anti, can't no government handle a commando / Your man don't want it, Trump's a bitch! I'll make his whole brand go under,"
Comment
-
Worth mentioning that the whole reason I made mention of Obama's "overreach" is that Trump is the King of the Executive Order. The Muslim Ban provides no better example of Executive overreach, since it couldn't meet the smallest burden at the circuit court level to stand up, which was a demonstration of some risk to the U.S. if the ban wasn't enacted. Not one citation, not one shred of evidence. His rationale was basically, in the words of Stephen Copernicus Miller, "the President's executive powers are substantial and will not be questioned."Originally posted by creekster View PostDidnt Obama over reach? I thought so then. Did you not agree? You think hte exec order was A-OK?"I'm anti, can't no government handle a commando / Your man don't want it, Trump's a bitch! I'll make his whole brand go under,"
Comment
-
It's worth pointing that the conversative narrative that Obama abused executive orders, at a rate previously unseen is a crock of shit. He issued, on average, fewer than any POTUS since Cleveland. https://www.google.com/amp/www.pewre...rders/%3famp=1Originally posted by Commando View PostWorth mentioning that the whole reason I made mention of Obama's "overreach" is that Trump is the King of the Executive Order. The Muslim Ban provides no better example of Executive overreach, since it couldn't meet the smallest burden at the circuit court level to stand up, which was a demonstration of some risk to the U.S. if the ban wasn't enacted. Not one citation, not one shred of evidence. His rationale was basically, in the words of Stephen Copernicus Miller, "the President's executive powers are substantial and will not be questioned."
Comment
-
On a conversative basis only, I don't think the number of orders has anything to do with whether their reach was proper. Both Bush and Obama issued EO's at a virtually identical but moderate rate and both of them overreached, IMO, quite a few times.Originally posted by frank ryan View PostIt's worth pointing that the conversative narrative that Obama abused executive orders, at a rate previously unseen is a crock of shit. He issued, on average, fewer than any POTUS since Cleveland. https://www.google.com/amp/www.pewre...rders/%3famp=1PLesa excuse the tpyos.
Comment
-
Yeah, too many executive orders... So should we be happy that Drumpf is getting rid of the DACA executive order and is giving congress six months to not make it an executive order?Originally posted by Commando View PostWorth mentioning that the whole reason I made mention of Obama's "overreach" is that Trump is the King of the Executive Order. The Muslim Ban provides no better example of Executive overreach, since it couldn't meet the smallest burden at the circuit court level to stand up, which was a demonstration of some risk to the U.S. if the ban wasn't enacted. Not one citation, not one shred of evidence. His rationale was basically, in the words of Stephen Copernicus Miller, "the President's executive powers are substantial and will not be questioned.""If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
Legally, DACA was technically an overreach by Obama. But pragmatically, it's impossible to round up and deport every single one of the millions of people here who don't have legal status. So with Congress refusing to do anything to resolve the immigration issue properly, as a practical matter it makes sense for the chief executive whose job it is to enforce existing law to spell out some guidelines for ICE on how to do it. And it also makes sense to make those who were brought here as children and don't know any other country and who have never been in legal trouble, be last on the priority list for kicking out. That's basically all DACA is. Yes, it allows them to work and go to school like normal people. Big freaking whoop. The real reason the Bannonites and extreme nationalists like them are opposed to it is because they hate the idea that any person not here legally shouldn't be treated like absolute crap.Originally posted by creekster View PostOn a conversative basis only, I don't think the number of orders has anything to do with whether their reach was proper. Both Bush and Obama issued EO's at a virtually identical but moderate rate and both of them overreached, IMO, quite a few times.
That said, I don't have a huge problem with Trump telling Congress it's on them to fix it. I will have a huge problem if Congress does pass something that fixes it and grants some form of legal status, only to see Trump veto it. But one important question is why does Trump have to bring this to the forefront right now when there are more pressing issues for Congress to deal with.Last edited by BlueK; 09-07-2017, 09:05 AM.
Comment
-
Up is down, black is white, RINOs don't work with democrats enough:
This is the end result of tea party and other grass roots activism. It energizes the base, but on the right it still remains only a protest vote. And it protests anything that disagrees with the populist who takes up their cause."...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
Comment
-
Who knows the mind of Trump, but a purely speculative guess is he wants some victories to point to for his base to rally around.Originally posted by BlueK View PostThat said, I don't have a huge problem with Trump telling Congress it's on them to fix it. I will have a huge problem if Congress does pass something that fixes it and grants some form of legal status, only to see Trump veto it. But one important question is why does Trump have to bring this to the forefront right now when there are more pressing issues for Congress to deal with.
Immigration needs to be addressed and we need some reasonable path to citizenship.
Congress can fix this once and for all, if it can do two things:
First, establish a reasonable basis for attaining citizenship for those here.
Second, create Work Visas for workers from Mexico and reasonable quotas after determining what number of workers our economy needs."Guitar groups are on their way out, Mr Epstein."
Upon rejecting the Beatles, Dick Rowe told Brian Epstein of the January 1, 1962 audition for Decca, which signed Brian Poole and the Tremeloes instead.
Comment
-
Trump has proven to be a xenophobe, and I think this a factor.Originally posted by Topper View PostWho knows the mind of Trump, but a purely speculative guess is he wants some victories to point to for his base to rally around.
Immigration needs to be addressed and we need some reasonable path to citizenship.
Congress can fix this once and for all, if it can do two things:
First, establish a reasonable basis for attaining citizenship for those here.
Second, create Work Visas for workers from Mexico and reasonable quotas after determining what number of workers our economy needs.
Comment
-
His core base isn't going to rally around anything that resembles helping dreamers. They would rather watch their Fox News with scenes of the mass deportation force Trump talked about during the campaign ripping families out of their homes to send to Mexico. Trump was just hoping to have it both ways. By ending DACA he can claim to be doing what his core base wants, while at the same time having Congress to blame when his wacko base complains when they pass something that helps those folks.Originally posted by Topper View PostWho knows the mind of Trump, but a purely speculative guess is he wants some victories to point to for his base to rally around.
Immigration needs to be addressed and we need some reasonable path to citizenship.
Congress can fix this once and for all, if it can do two things:
First, establish a reasonable basis for attaining citizenship for those here.
Second, create Work Visas for workers from Mexico and reasonable quotas after determining what number of workers our economy needs.Last edited by BlueK; 09-07-2017, 10:51 AM.
Comment
Comment