Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SCOTUS

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Moliere View Post

    There are perfectly reasonable arguments for each of those cases being decided as they were, starting with Roe. I’m willing to bet that if there were six liberal justices on the court that you or NWC wouldn’t be advocating for term limits.
    I would absolutely advocate for term limits. Ginsburg refusing to retire while at death’s door and Thomas hanging on for 40 plus years just to pwn the libs are two sides of the same coin. Lifetime appointments should have no place in current democracies.
    "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
    "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
    - SeattleUte

    Comment


    • Originally posted by All-American View Post

      Based on the actions of two judges? Absolutely. I mean, it could be three. Or four. Or five. I could go on.
      roberts is being as partisan as thomas

      Comment


      • Originally posted by All-American View Post

        You’re aware that there are nine justices, right?
        could be more
        Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.

        Dig your own grave, and save!

        "The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American

        "I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally

        GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Maximus View Post

          roberts is being as partisan as thomas
          There you have it. It is now 50% worse than was previously possible to imagine.
          τὸν ἥλιον ἀνατέλλοντα πλείονες ἢ δυόμενον προσκυνοῦσιν

          Comment


          • Originally posted by All-American View Post

            There you have it. It is now 50% worse than was previously possible to imagine.
            I imagine youd agree if the unsigned decisions were against the gop platform

            Comment


            • So gutting minority districts is ok but protecting them is banned

              Am I right

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Maximus View Post
                So gutting minority districts is ok but protecting them is banned

                Am I right
                a bit weird
                Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.

                Dig your own grave, and save!

                "The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American

                "I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally

                GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Maximus View Post
                  So gutting minority districts is ok but protecting them is banned

                  Am I right
                  Nothing to see here, just the Court deciding they can wipe out legislation passed by Congress decades ago and upheld multiple times by previous versions of the Court. But nice to know conservatives don't legislate from the bench.

                  Comment


                  • Stacking the odd against the democrats. That'll teach the DEI people.

                    Comment


                    • Comment


                      • Comment

                        Working...
                        X