Originally posted by Maximus
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
SCOTUS
Collapse
X
-
Seems like a common sense ruling and one that is likely supported by a majority of the population.Originally posted by Shaka View PostGood SCOTUS! It doesn't ban all therapies, just puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and medical transitions for minors."Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf
- 1 like
Comment
-
-
A great principled decision for those Tennessee parents who need those very therapies for kids who require them. And I'm not talking about transitioning. And I totally trust politicians to understand the nuance of medically necessary treatments.Originally posted by Shaka View PostGood SCOTUS! It doesn't ban all therapies, just puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and medical transitions for minors."...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
Comment
-
If definition of "actually affected" is just the minority of families with minor children who have gender dysphoria and have also decided to treat those minors with physical alterations, then I would guess no the majority does not support it. That doesn't automatically mean it's a wrong decision though.Originally posted by LVAllen View Post
What about a majority of the families that are actually affected by this? Do you think they support it?
Comment
-
Do you think there should be any restriction on surgeries and/or medical treatments for minors?Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post
A great principled decision for those Tennessee parents who need those very therapies for kids who require them. And I'm not talking about transitioning. And I totally trust politicians to understand the nuance of medically necessary treatments.
And help us understand the circumstances where a decision to surgically castrate yourself can't until a person is an adult."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
Also, the Tennessee law is line with most European countries. The UK, Norway, Sweden, etc now ban puberty blockers, etc for minors. The Cass Review in the UK found that the evidence supporting the need for gender-affirming care in minors is extremely weak."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
Yep. Facts and science support the SCOTUS decision. Liberal scare tactics and talking points are misaligned with science on this one.Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View PostAlso, the Tennessee law is line with most European countries. The UK, Norway, Sweden, etc now ban puberty blockers, etc for minors. The Cass Review in the UK found that the evidence supporting the need for gender-affirming care in minors is extremely weak."Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf
Comment
-
I am okay with deferring to children to make permanent decisions about their bodies.... as long as medical and other professionals(psychlogists, etc.) and also parents who helped them to those decisions can be held financially or criminally responsible should that child grow up and regret that permanent decision. $10 M settlement or 5-year prison term, minimum.
If parents and professionals are THAT certain that the risks of permanent surgery and treatment are worth it, then they should have some of their skin in the game along with the skin lopped off of the child.
Comment
-
Facts don't support it. The science doesn't support it. And the law for sure doesn't support it. The opinion is bullshit wrapped in catshit with a side of horseshit.Originally posted by Moliere View Post
Yep. Facts and science support the SCOTUS decision. Liberal scare tactics and talking points are misaligned with science on this one.
Comment
-
We've been through this before. I have cited real-world examples of congenital diseases where 'puberty blockers' and surgical interventions are very necessary treatments. If you think our state legislators are wise enough to craft laws that do not hinder medically indicated treatments, you have much more faith in our elected officials than I do.Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
Do you think there should be any restriction on surgeries and/or medical treatments for minors?
And help us understand the circumstances where a decision to surgically castrate yourself can't until a person is an adult."...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
Comment
-
Rare congenital diseases are not the issue here.Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post
We've been through this before. I have cited real-world examples of congenital diseases where 'puberty blockers' and surgical interventions are very necessary treatments. If you think our state legislators are wise enough to craft laws that do not hinder medically indicated treatments, you have much more faith in our elected officials than I do."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
Comment