Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Same-sex marriage coming to Utah

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by San Juan Sun View Post
    So we're going back to the homosexuality-is-a-mental-illness argument. Excellent.

    Does the editorial board at the DesNews understand how tone deaf they are on this one?
    In five years, probably less, they are going to wish they had buried all these articles somewhere not digitally accessible.
    Awesomeness now has a name. Let me introduce myself.

    Comment


    • I read through the first few comments and it's encouraging to see that even Mormons are seeing this for the nonsense that it is.
      At least the Big Ten went after a big-time addition in Nebraska; the Pac-10 wanted a game so badly, it added Utah
      -Berry Trammel, 12/3/10

      Comment


      • Originally posted by ERCougar View Post
        I read through the first few comments and it's encouraging to see that even Mormons are seeing this for the nonsense that it is.
        It is embarassing to be associated with those who throw out ancient arguments. How about you just believe in traditional marriage. If you can't argue that, then drop it. This mental and learned behavior crap is just that, crap.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Pheidippides View Post
          In five years, probably less, they are going to wish they had buried all these articles somewhere not digitally accessible.
          Maybe they can ask BYU-Idaho to archive the articles on their servers?

          Originally posted by ERCougar View Post
          I read through the first few comments and it's encouraging to see that even Mormons are seeing this for the nonsense that it is.
          Keep reading. It gets "better."
          Last edited by HBCoug; 07-07-2014, 10:54 AM.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Pheidippides View Post
            In five years, probably less, they are going to wish they had buried all these articles somewhere not digitally accessible.
            I hope it's less.

            I don't really care about the BoM historicity or whether JS actually saw God, but when stuff like this gets printed in the church's newspaper it's incredibly offensive. At least they printed it as an opinion piece instead of an actual news article although the title could read "...is possible in very limited cases". Thankfully the only place I've seen this article show up on FB is in threads lamenting that the article was actually published.
            "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

            Comment


            • Originally posted by ERCougar View Post
              I read through the first few comments and it's encouraging to see that even Mormons are seeing this for the nonsense that it is.
              I agree. The ratio of comments must have been like 90% against the article. When the comments are more rational than the article, you have a problem, DesNews.
              "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
              "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
              - SeattleUte

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Moliere View Post
                I hope it's less.

                I don't really care about the BoM historicity or whether JS actually saw God, but when stuff like this gets printed in the church's newspaper it's incredibly offensive. At least they printed it as an opinion piece instead of an actual news article although the title could read "...is possible in very limited cases". Thankfully the only place I've seen this article show up on FB is in threads lamenting that the article was actually published.
                I totally get that. To an outsider, the BOM and JS stuff just makes you a harmless zealot with crazy beliefs. But add in the other and you are now a bigoted zealot. And nobody wants that, in or out.
                Awesomeness now has a name. Let me introduce myself.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Moliere View Post
                  I hope it's less.

                  I don't really care about the BoM historicity or whether JS actually saw God, but when stuff like this gets printed in the church's newspaper it's incredibly offensive. At least they printed it as an opinion piece instead of an actual news article although the title could read "...is possible in very limited cases". Thankfully the only place I've seen this article show up on FB is in threads lamenting that the article was actually published.
                  Originally posted by Pheidippides View Post
                  I totally get that. To an outsider, the BOM and JS stuff just makes you a harmless zealot with crazy beliefs. But add in the other and you are now a bigoted zealot. And nobody wants that, in or out.
                  This is a pretty good description of my current struggles with church activity. History stuff has never resonated with me. Current stuff though ...
                  "It's true that everything happens for a reason. Just remember that sometimes that reason is that you did something really, really, stupid."

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by FMCoug View Post
                    This is a pretty good description of my current struggles with church activity. History stuff has never resonated with me. Current stuff though ...
                    History stuff totally resonated with me but I've moved past that. I'm agnostic when it comes to most of the history.
                    "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

                    Comment


                    • See I don't get that. If the historicity isn't important than it's just a community (fraternity if you like), right? That's weird to me. I certainly don't hold it against any active member that believes JS saw God/JC/et al, but to say you've "moved past" or it "doesn't resonate" as a reason to remain in the church seems bizarre to me. Am I missing something here?

                      Is it just that you are able to feel the love of God in a Mormon congregation? Does attendance/participation help you and your family to remain close? I'm really trying to see what it is that causes someone to participate when the fundamentals of the religion are removed or worse; accepted as untrue.
                      "Either evolution or intelligent design can account for the athlete, but neither can account for the sports fan." - Robert Brault

                      "Once I seen the trades go down and the other guys signed elsewhere," he said, "I knew it was my time now." - Derrick Favors

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post
                        I agree. The ratio of comments must have been like 90% against the article. When the comments are more rational than the article, you have a problem, DesNews.
                        Not to nitpick, but, it wasn't an article, it was an opinion piece. Apparently written by an evangelical, not a mormon (which is only significant because it is a mormon paper).

                        Comment


                        • You guys are funny. The Deseret News isn't a rogue voice in the LDS wilderness. This is mainstream LDS teaching. This is what the LDS Church is -- a racist organizatoin as long as public opinion would allow it to get away with it, and an organization that does not believe in gender equaility, that bullies and oppresses girls and women, telling them they're inferior from the time they were children and casts them out if they express public disagreement, that opposes civil rights for LGBT and teaches that LGBT are abnormal, sick and shouldn't be allowed to marry or adopt or even raise children. LDS theology and culture is shot through with these attitudes. It's like pro football and the forward pass.
                          When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.

                          --Jonathan Swift

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Blueintheface View Post
                            See I don't get that. If the historicity isn't important than it's just a community (fraternity if you like), right? That's weird to me. I certainly don't hold it against any active member that believes JS saw God/JC/et al, but to say you've "moved past" or it "doesn't resonate" as a reason to remain in the church seems bizarre to me. Am I missing something here?

                            Is it just that you are able to feel the love of God in a Mormon congregation? Does attendance/participation help you and your family to remain close? I'm really trying to see what it is that causes someone to participate when the fundamentals of the religion are removed or worse; accepted as untrue.
                            When you say "fundamentals of the religion" you're thinking abstract theology: literal atonement, scriptures, priesthood, Joseph Smith, Book of Mormon, Prophets, etc.

                            I think "fundamentals of the religion" can instead mean knowing and serving people in the ward and stake and you can do that most effectively when you stay in the church.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
                              You guys are funny. The Deseret News isn't a rogue voice in the LDS wilderness. This is mainstream LDS teaching. This is what the LDS Church is -- a racist organizatoin as long as public opinion would allow it to get away with it, and an organization that does not believe in gender equaility, that bullies and oppresses girls and women, telling them they're inferior from the time they were children and casts them out if they express public disagreement, that opposes civil rights for LGBT and teaches that LGBT are abnormal, sick and shouldn't be allowed to marry or adopt or even raise children. LDS theology and culture is shot through with these attitudes. It's like pro football and the forward pass.
                              Yep it's led by our grandfathers and people who share the incorrect attitudes/biases of our grandfathers. Don't worry, we'll bring the church around eventually. The Church is more than its mistakes -- it's also the community, like McMurrin says.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by CardiacCoug View Post
                                When you say "fundamentals of the religion" you're thinking abstract theology: literal atonement, scriptures, priesthood, Joseph Smith, Book of Mormon, Prophets, etc.

                                I think "fundamentals of the religion" can instead mean knowing and serving people in the ward and stake and you can do that most effectively when you stay in the church.
                                I should have stated that more clearly. I'm not discounting "serve thy neighbor" as a integral part of the gospel of Jesus Christ (not specifically Mormon of course) but when I think fundamentals I think about what makes it distinct from other Christian faiths. I don't have to restate what makes Mormonism unique.
                                "Either evolution or intelligent design can account for the athlete, but neither can account for the sports fan." - Robert Brault

                                "Once I seen the trades go down and the other guys signed elsewhere," he said, "I knew it was my time now." - Derrick Favors

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X