If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
This chart showed up with some of my sample plots in R. It is fascinating, showing the rapid acceptance of social issues. I think this chart was prepared for Bloomberg, but I havent seen it before.
This chart showed up with some of my sample plots in R. It is fascinating, showing the rapid acceptance of social issues. I think this chart was prepared for Bloomberg, but I havent seen it before.
That will be an excellent visial aid for my GD lesson this week on "signs of the times."
Prepare to put mustard on those words, for you will soon be consuming them, along with this slice of humble pie that comes direct from the oven of shame set at gas mark “egg on your face”! -- Moss
There's three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who's got the same first name as a city; and never go near a lady's got a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, everything else is cream cheese. --Coach Finstock
Christian couple threatens to divorce if same-sex marriage becomes legal
A man and woman who are currently married to each other — happily, it seems — announced on Wednesday that they plan to get divorced if Australia ever legalizes same-sex marriage. This means, essentially, that they’ve made a public threat against no one else’s welfare except their own and that of their children, but we’ll entertain their lashing out anyway.
Nick Jensen, director of the conservative christian Lachlan Macquarie Institute, wrote an op-ed for the Canberra CityNews explaining that he and his wife of ten years, Sarah, will get divorced as a protest against legalized marriage equality, which they believe would redefine the state of their union in an unsuitable way. From Jensen’s editorial:
Our view is that marriage is a fundamental order of creation. Part of God’s intimate story for human history. Marriage is the union of a man and a woman before a community in the sight of God. And the marriage of any couple is important to God regardless of whether that couple recognises God’s involvement or authority in it.
My wife and I, as a matter of conscience, refuse to recognise the government’s regulation of marriage if its definition includes the solemnisation of same sex couples. [...]
The truth is, “marriage” is simply too important. It is a sacred institution, ordained by God. It has always been understood to be that exclusive relationship where one man and one woman become “one flesh”. Any attempt to change the definition of marriage by law is not something in which we are able to partake.
This reminds me... what ever happened to that kid that was doing the hunger strike because of same sex marriage?
"If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU. "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek. GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
"Be a philosopher. A man can compromise to gain a point. It has become apparent that a man can, within limits, follow his inclinations within the arms of the Church if he does so discreetly." - The Walking Drum
"And here’s what life comes down to—not how many years you live, but how many of those years are filled with bullshit that doesn’t amount to anything to satisfy the requirements of some dickhead you’ll never get the pleasure of punching in the face." – Adam Carolla
I was wondering why my marriage felt less valid all of the sudden.
"Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf
I was wondering why my marriage felt less valid all of the sudden.
The more I have thought about it, the more I think mormon's would feel less angst over gay marriage being legal.
I was taught from a very young age that anything less than a Temple marriage was not a valid marriage. I think recently I even heard some leader talk about dating a non mormon or inactive mormon could be dangerous. You could fall in love and end up not marrying in the Temple.
I think it will be interesting to watch the debate that will surely happen concerning polygamy. I would assume no one who supports gay marriage would find themselves arguing that polygamy is not a "traditional marriage".
Comment