Phil Robertson v. A&E

[FN Phat]

Care to make an actual argument?

That is not his strong suit. He usually likes to wait until someone more articulate, such as el wuapo, sweeps in and makes the arguement for him.

[byu71]

Care to make an actual argument?

If you have a problem with the Judge you automatically have a problem with gay marriage. If you have a problem with gay marriage you have a low I.Q., follow religious leaders blindly and are a bigot. There is your argument.

[old_gregg]

That is not his strong suit. He usually likes to wait until someone more articulate, such as el wuapo, sweeps in and makes the arguement for him.

stick to attic fans

[wuapinmon]

someone more articulate, such as el wuapo, sweeps in and makes the argument for him.

[FN Phat]

stick to attic fans

[cougjunkie]

Robertson's tell A&E all of us or none of us. A&E says welcome back Phil! They have resumed filming with the entire family.



Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

[Jeff Lebowski]

Robertson's tell A&E all of us or none of us. A&E says welcome back Phil! They have resumed filming with the entire family.

That's funny.

[Commando]

LOL. Well, I guess that's mission accomplished for A&E. They get to keep milking that cash cow after having feigned indignation for juuuust long enough.

[UVACoug]

I view their overturning decisions as merely enforcing the prior votes the people gave that established rights like the 14th Amendment (ratified by the States) and judicial review of the legislative process and enactments. They are supporting a more important vote for rights by overturning a law that infringes on the laws so sacrosanct that we enshrined them in the Constitution so that the SCOTUS can't overturn them.

Who voted to ratify judicial review?

[Commando]

Who voted to ratify judicial review?

John Marshall

[Maximus]

Yes, just like the Dixie Chicks....

I don't think Phil should lose his job. It is sad how often people go after people's livelihoods in these situations.

However, I also don't understand how so many self-proclaimed Christians can post on Facebook and in other public settings statements of unfettered support for a statement so crass and un-Christlike. And that has nothing to do with one's views on sin and homosexuality.

I also find much of the support of Phil quite hypocritical as I've seen these same folks burn their Dixie Chicks CDs, try to get public school teachers fired because of something they said, or were birthers back in the day and tried to overturn an election they found ideologically inconvenient.


Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

Except his statement wasn't any of those things, but keep trying,

[VirginiaCougar]

Except his statement wasn't any of those things, but keep trying,

I guess we have very different ideas on what is crass and Christ-like. If what Phil said about anuses and bestiality doesn't fit, I really don't want to know your definition of crass.

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

[Maximus]

I guess we have very different ideas on what is crass and Christ-like. If what Phil said about anuses and bestiality doesn't fit, I really don't want to know your definition of crass.

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

I bet you think he compared homosexuality to bestiality. he didnt.

[imanihonjin]

Just when I didn't think the republican party could get any dumber.....

http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/duck-dynastys-robertson-address-gop-conference

[Flystripper]