If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
That whole piece is based on the assumption that Fehrnstrom was talking about Mitt's positions and not the strategic difference between a primary campaign and a general election campaign. (Shakes head.)
“There is a great deal of difference in believing something still, and believing it again.”
― W.H. Auden
"God made the angels to show His splendour - as He made animals for innocence and plants for their simplicity. But men and women He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of their minds."
-- Robert Bolt, A Man for All Seasons
"It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
--Antoine de Saint-Exupery
That whole piece is based on the assumption that Fehrnstrom was talking about Mitt's positions and not the strategic difference between a primary campaign and a general election campaign. (Shakes head.)
I thought it was creative and humorous. Though I disagree with the last line.
"Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf
Unless the creativity and humor are aimed at opponents of Mitt, LAU ain't having it.
I'll admit I didn't read it carefully after the first 3 paragraphs or so. But you're right, if it had been about Santorum or Obama it would have been spot-on and hilarious. Everyone knows that.*
*I'm speaking hypothetically, of course. The NY Times would never allow a biting satire about Obama.
“There is a great deal of difference in believing something still, and believing it again.”
― W.H. Auden
"God made the angels to show His splendour - as He made animals for innocence and plants for their simplicity. But men and women He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of their minds."
-- Robert Bolt, A Man for All Seasons
"It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
--Antoine de Saint-Exupery
In one scene, we hear Francis say over the phone, "Well, tell Jim His Honor's not going to Michigan." After a beat, he adds: "Because Romney's a clown and I don't want him standing next to him."
Obviously Francis wasn't talking about Mitt Romney, but rather George Romney, the moderate Republican governor of Michigan from 1963 to 1969...
Mitt Romney's son Tagg responded to the episode today in a pair of Tweets. In the first, he said, "Seriously, lib media mocking my dead grandpa?" And in the second, "George Romney was as good a man I've ever known. Inspirational leader, worked for civil rights, promoted freedom. We need more like him."
"I think it was King Benjamin who said 'you sorry ass shitbags who have no skills that the market values also have an obligation to have the attitude that if one day you do in fact win the PowerBall Lottery that you will then impart of your substance to those without.'"
- Goatnapper'96
"Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf
In 1966 no one who paid any attention to current events (like that Mad Men character) would have described George Romney as a clown. So that bit doesn't ring true.
“There is a great deal of difference in believing something still, and believing it again.”
― W.H. Auden
"God made the angels to show His splendour - as He made animals for innocence and plants for their simplicity. But men and women He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of their minds."
-- Robert Bolt, A Man for All Seasons
"It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
--Antoine de Saint-Exupery
In 1966 no one who paid any attention to current events (like that Mad Men character) would have described George Romney as a clown. So that bit doesn't ring true.
From personal experience, I agree with this. In 1966, the only knocks on Romney were his moderate-liberal views and his somewhat stilted oratorical style. Only after his "brainwashed" comment (early '68, I believe) would he have been characterized as a clown or something similar. It was clearly a cheap shot by the writers aimed at Mitt. Although it would be impolitic to suggest it, Mitt's dad was living a far more exemplary life in the 60's than was Barak's, and I think even Barak would agree.
From personal experience, I agree with this. In 1966, the only knocks on Romney were his moderate-liberal views and his somewhat stilted oratorical style. Only after his "brainwashed" comment (early '68, I believe) would he have been characterized as a clown or something similar. It was clearly a cheap shot by the writers aimed at Mitt. Although it would be impolitic to suggest it, Mitt's dad was living a far more exemplary life in the 60's than was Barak's, and I think even Barak would agree.
I was on my mission in Ohio during that time. I still remember this older lady saying to us. "Your mormon. George Romeny is Mormon. I would never vote for him. He would probably go to church on Sunday".
From personal experience, I agree with this. In 1966, the only knocks on Romney were his moderate-liberal views and his somewhat stilted oratorical style. Only after his "brainwashed" comment (early '68, I believe) would he have been characterized as a clown or something similar. It was clearly a cheap shot by the writers aimed at Mitt. Although it would be impolitic to suggest it, Mitt's dad was living a far more exemplary life in the 60's than was Barak's, and I think even Barak would agree.
I never understood why the brainwashed comment ruined his political career.
When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
Comment