JD Vance is a duplicitous POS

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pelado
    Bald not naked
    • Sep 2010
    • 21211

    #91
    Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
    I love Claude and I won’t permit this kind of slanderous talk about it.
    Claude was ok in action movies but I wouldn't trust him for AI.
    "I think it was King Benjamin who said 'you sorry ass shitbags who have no skills that the market values also have an obligation to have the attitude that if one day you do in fact win the PowerBall Lottery that you will then impart of your substance to those without.'"
    - Goatnapper'96

    Comment

    • The_Tick
      Made something of myself
      • Nov 2008
      • 7303

      #92
      So we all agree that the unchecked/open borders during the Biden Administration were, and continue to be, a huge burden on the US taxpayer to the tune of 150B per ChatGPT. And that is just one year.

      So yes...folks were lined up. That has stopped.

      Now, I wrote a paper 10 years ago now about changes I'd like to see in the immigration policy, so I am no Johnny come lately to this party.

      Comment

      • Bo Diddley
        Senior
        • Jul 2012
        • 18852

        #93
        Ok, one side of the equation is the cost. What is on the other side of the equation? What value do they add to our economy?

        Comment

        • The_Tick
          Made something of myself
          • Nov 2008
          • 7303

          #94
          Originally posted by Bo Diddley View Post
          Ok, one side of the equation is the cost. What is on the other side of the equation? What value do they add to our economy?
          31B in taxes according to the link. Now, a great contributor in sweat equity to the US economy. I don't disagree there.

          I posted an essay I wrote elsewhere. I'm big on amnesty for anyone pre-2020, and a huge overhaul in our immigration policy. I am strongly against border enforcement under the Biden administration.

          I'd also like seeing birthright citizenship change to one of the parents needing to be a US citizen, but I don't know if that will ever happen.

          I'm also in favor of term limits, and politicians not being able to exempt themselves or their staffers from any law they enact. (Just want to be fully transparent here.)

          Comment

          • Bo Diddley
            Senior
            • Jul 2012
            • 18852

            #95
            Originally posted by The_Tick View Post

            31B in taxes according to the link. Now, a great contributor in sweat equity to the US economy. I don't disagree there.

            I posted an essay I wrote elsewhere. I'm big on amnesty for anyone pre-2020, and a huge overhaul in our immigration policy. I am strongly against border enforcement under the Biden administration.

            I'd also like seeing birthright citizenship change to one of the parents needing to be a US citizen, but I don't know if that will ever happen.

            I'm also in favor of term limits, and politicians not being able to exempt themselves or their staffers from any law they enact. (Just want to be fully transparent here.)
            ChatGPT says more like $100 Billion.

            Tax Contributions
            In 2022, undocumented immigrants paid approximately $96.7 billion in total taxes—split into $59.4 billion to the federal government and $37.3 billion to state and local governments.
            My gut tells me they're not a drain at all, but that they add quite a lot. But I agree with you on making changes.

            Comment

            • The_Tick
              Made something of myself
              • Nov 2008
              • 7303

              #96
              Originally posted by Bo Diddley View Post

              ChatGPT says more like $100 Billion.



              My gut tells me they're not a drain at all, but that they add quite a lot. But I agree with you on making changes.
              You are using 2022 data, I was using 2024 data. We are both probably right.

              You can't say that they are "not a drain at all". They are a drain on the system. Quantifying how much is tough. But the numbers are in the billions.

              Comment

              • Bo Diddley
                Senior
                • Jul 2012
                • 18852

                #97
                Originally posted by The_Tick View Post

                You are using 2022 data, I was using 2024 data. We are both probably right.

                You can't say that they are "not a drain at all". They are a drain on the system. Quantifying how much is tough. But the numbers are in the billions.
                I'm speaking in net terms.

                Comment

                • falafel
                  loves to talk on things
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 38030

                  #98
                  Originally posted by The_Tick View Post

                  You are using 2022 data, I was using 2024 data. We are both probably right.

                  You can't say that they are "not a drain at all". They are a drain on the system. Quantifying how much is tough. But the numbers are in the billions.
                  I get what you are saying, but I also get Bo's point. You are talking in terms of outflow, but what about their contributions to the overall economy? 100 Billion in taxes, so just think what their economic impact overall is. 300 billion? 500 billion? 125 billion?

                  We can't really evaluate their impact without all of the numbers.
                  Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.

                  Dig your own grave, and save!

                  "The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American

                  "I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally

                  GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

                  Comment

                  • Clark Addison
                    Senior Member
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 10327

                    #99
                    I would bet quite a bit of money that from an overall economic perspective illegal immigrants are a net economic positive. I honestly doubt it is even close; the economic benefit is likely far larger than the economic cost.

                    Caveats:
                    1. By "overall economic" I mean much more than "taxes paid minus benefits received", I mean impact on inflation (significant at times), on wages, on productivity, etc.
                    2. I am NOT saying that this should be a driver of illegal immigration policies (though it should be a factor among many others on LEGAL immigration policies). But I am saying that if your argument against illegal immigration is because "they cost us money", then I am pretty sure your argument is flawed. This is of course just my opinion. It's based on a lot of data I've seen, but who knows, I may be wrong.

                    Comment

                    • Jeff Lebowski
                      Corporate lackey for Jesus
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 69813

                      #100
                      Originally posted by falafel View Post

                      I get what you are saying, but I also get Bo's point. You are talking in terms of outflow, but what about their contributions to the overall economy? 100 Billion in taxes, so just think what their economic impact overall is. 300 billion? 500 billion? 125 billion?

                      We can't really evaluate their impact without all of the numbers.
                      Yeah, this talk of tax revenue and cost to social programs misses the mark. I have seen economists argue that even the poor immigrants swimming across the river and not paying taxes, etc are a net benefit the economy because the foundation of the economy is consumers and productivity. If we curtail immigration, we will be facing a rapidly declining population over the next few decades and that will be a massive drag on the economy. This anti-immigrant sentiment is crazy. Yeah, let's reform it to make it more orderly and efficient, but choking it off is suicidal.
                      "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                      "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                      "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                      Comment

                      • BlueK
                        Senior Member
                        • May 2011
                        • 7226

                        #101
                        Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post

                        Yeah, this talk of tax revenue and cost to social programs misses the mark. I have seen economists argue that even the poor immigrants swimming across the river and not paying taxes, etc are a net benefit the economy because the foundation of the economy is consumers and productivity. If we curtail immigration, we will be facing a rapidly declining population over the next few decades and that will be a massive drag on the economy. This anti-immigrant sentiment is crazy. Yeah, let's reform it to make it more orderly and efficient, but choking it off is suicidal.
                        To put it politely, the real push against immigration is fear of social and cultural changes to American society, of which actual racism is certainly a subset of that. It gets justified with pseudo economic arguments that ultimately don't hold much water.

                        Comment

                        • RC Vikings
                          Known Heterosexual
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 8789

                          #102
                          Our loading foreman has been in the U.S. for over 20 years, he has enough paperwork that he was able to work, buy a house, buy cars and raise a family here, also he has been paying into SS and paying taxes all this time. He will not collect a penny of SS, it's easy to get the numbers needed to work, it's hard to get the right numbers to collect SS because those must be legit. Many will retire back to Mexico.

                          Comment

                          • Bo Diddley
                            Senior
                            • Jul 2012
                            • 18852

                            #103
                            Maybe this goes here with the Vance connection.

                            I thought this incident was pretty ridiculous. The Marines conducted an artillery live fire over I-5. Lots of finger pointing going on.
                            That it failed and exploded right over I-5 seems really unlucky--almost to the point of being suspicious. Perhaps they fired with some old or damaged fuses?

                            https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5...vance-marines/

                            I do not know what the safety parameters are for artillery live fire. All I know is whenever these are conducted at Camp Williams, all roads are closed under the actual flight path of the rounds along with a buffer zone.

                            Comment

                            • falafel
                              loves to talk on things
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 38030

                              #104
                              Originally posted by Bo Diddley View Post
                              Maybe this goes here with the Vance connection.

                              I thought this incident was pretty ridiculous. The Marines conducted an artillery live fire over I-5. Lots of finger pointing going on.
                              That it failed and exploded right over I-5 seems really unlucky--almost to the point of being suspicious. Perhaps they fired with some old or damaged fuses?

                              https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5...vance-marines/

                              I do not know what the safety parameters are for artillery live fire. All I know is whenever these are conducted at Camp Williams, all roads are closed under the actual flight path of the rounds along with a buffer zone.
                              Newsome, CA Highway Patrol, and others were wondering the same thing. Newsome actually shut down I-5 for 17 miles because it was so needlessly dangerous. And then sharpnel from one of the shells actually landed on a CA Hwy Patrol vehicle.... that was part of Vance's detail.
                              Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.

                              Dig your own grave, and save!

                              "The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American

                              "I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally

                              GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

                              Comment

                              • frank ryan
                                Senior Member
                                • Nov 2008
                                • 12446

                                #105
                                They are trying to provoke rational for further crackdown on "leftists or antifa," don't fall for it.

                                Vance is the same guy who admitted making up lies about immigrants eating dogs to whip up nativist hysteria.

                                Comment

                                Working...