Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Biden/Harris: A Presidency for All Americans

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by chrisrenrut View Post

    Do “scope” or “scale” have any meaning to you? Trying to both-sides-of-the-same-coin this compared to what Trump is doing to prosecute or withhold funds from his political enemies or even just blue states is the only argument here that “rings hallow”.

    And hasn’t the IRS targeting conservative non-profits been debunked? During Trumps first term, the Treasury Dept Inspector General found the IRS used both conservative and liberal key words to choose targets for further scrutiny. That’s from Wikipedia, so I’m open to info from other reputable and non-partisan sources.
    Scope has meaning and usually where there is smoke there is fire. You mention Wikipedia to try and debunk what the IRS did. Let’s look at another rogue investigation that targeted conservatives and a direct Presidential candidate to the opposing party. I mean. That is some serious shit.. And the subpoenas were based on some vague evidence including news articles?? All to cast a vast net to find information to be damaging to your opposing party (And people act like Trump was the first one to target Dems.).


    Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) today made public 197 subpoenas former Special Counsel Jack Smith and his team issued as part of the indiscriminate election case against President Trump. Smith’s case began at the Biden Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) under the codename “Arctic Frost.”

    The subpoenas, which were provided to Grassley through legally protected whistleblower disclosures, were sent to 34 individuals and 163 businesses. These 197 subpoenas requested testimony, communications and records related to at least 430 named Republican individuals and entities. Some of the records Smith subpoenaed from banks, individuals and businesses included:
    • Communications with media companies such as CBS, Fox News, Fox Business, Newsmax, Sinclair and others.
    • Communications with “any member, employee or agent of the Legislative Branch of the U.S. Government.”
    • Communications with White House advisors, such as Stephen Miller, Dan Scavino, Jared Kushner, Lara Trump and others.
    • Statistical data and analysis relating to donors and fundraising efforts.
    • Broad financial data relating to conservative individuals and entities.

    Grassley unveiled the subpoenas during a press conference alongside Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations Chairman Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and members of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

    Grassley at today’s press conference said, in part:

    “Arctic Frost was the vehicle by which partisan FBI agents and DOJ prosecutors could improperly investigate the entire Republican political apparatus. Contrary to what [Jack] Smith has said publicly, this was clearly a fishing expedition.”


    https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/pre...ce=chatgpt.com

    Comment


    • Originally posted by dabrockster View Post

      Scope has meaning and usually where there is smoke there is fire. You mention Wikipedia to try and debunk what the IRS did. Let’s look at another rogue investigation that targeted conservatives and a direct Presidential candidate to the opposing party. I mean. That is some serious shit.. And the subpoenas were based on some vague evidence including news articles?? All to cast a vast net to find information to be damaging to your opposing party (And people act like Trump was the first one to target Dems.).


      Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) today made public 197 subpoenas former Special Counsel Jack Smith and his team issued as part of the indiscriminate election case against President Trump. Smith’s case began at the Biden Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) under the codename “Arctic Frost.”

      The subpoenas, which were provided to Grassley through legally protected whistleblower disclosures, were sent to 34 individuals and 163 businesses. These 197 subpoenas requested testimony, communications and records related to at least 430 named Republican individuals and entities. Some of the records Smith subpoenaed from banks, individuals and businesses included:
      • Communications with media companies such as CBS, Fox News, Fox Business, Newsmax, Sinclair and others.
      • Communications with “any member, employee or agent of the Legislative Branch of the U.S. Government.”
      • Communications with White House advisors, such as Stephen Miller, Dan Scavino, Jared Kushner, Lara Trump and others.
      • Statistical data and analysis relating to donors and fundraising efforts.
      • Broad financial data relating to conservative individuals and entities.

      Grassley unveiled the subpoenas during a press conference alongside Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations Chairman Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and members of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

      Grassley at today’s press conference said, in part:

      “Arctic Frost was the vehicle by which partisan FBI agents and DOJ prosecutors could improperly investigate the entire Republican political apparatus. Contrary to what [Jack] Smith has said publicly, this was clearly a fishing expedition.”


      https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/pre...ce=chatgpt.com
      I’d have to look into this a bit more. But on the surface, I’m a little baffled why a special investigator doing investigation things is a surprise.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by chrisrenrut View Post

        I’d have to look into this a bit more. But on the surface, I’m a little baffled why a special investigator doing investigation things is a surprise.
        I am equally baffled to see over 400-conservatives subpoenaed in a broad net push and completely one-sided from the opposing party. This seems much more shady. How many subpoenas are the normal? Including U.S. senators and congressman’s part of those investigations. I mean. How is this not seen as over reach on MaCarthyism levels.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by dabrockster View Post

          I am equally baffled to see over 400-conservatives subpoenaed in a broad net push and completely one-sided from the opposing party. This seems much more shady. How many subpoenas are the normal? Including U.S. senators and congressman’s part of those investigations. I mean. How is this not seen as over reach on MaCarthyism levels.
          What about this investigation was normal? They were investigating insurrection and the attempt to thwart an election from the highest ranking officials in the US. And you don’t have to think very hard about why this investigation would focus on one party specifically.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by dabrockster View Post

            I am equally baffled to see over 400-conservatives subpoenaed in a broad net push and completely one-sided from the opposing party. This seems much more shady. How many subpoenas are the normal? Including U.S. senators and congressman’s part of those investigations. I mean. How is this not seen as over reach on MaCarthyism levels.
            Lol come on bro. Now pretending jan 6 and overturning the election. Was no biggie? Senators were directly involved in illegally betraying our nation. Of course they deserved to be subpoenaed


            A few dozen combined reps and senators should be in jail if we werent a banana republic

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Maximus View Post

              Lol come on bro. Now pretending jan 6 and overturning the election. Was no biggie? Senators were directly involved in illegally betraying our nation. Of course they deserved to be subpoenaed


              A few dozen combined reps and senators should be in jail if we werent a banana republic
              Despite a lot of speculation, there’s no evidence that any Republican U.S. senators were involved in planning or taking part in the January 6th attack on the Capitol.

              Investigations by Congress and law enforcement found no senators tied to organizing or encouraging violence. Some, like Josh Hawley and Ted Cruz, objected to the election results through legal procedures, but that’s very different from participating in the riot itself.

              Seriously. Please provide proof of your statement. Banks, foxnews, individual citizens and now senators. Expanding to say senators were trying to over throw the govt. The next conspirator movement sine 9/11’ers will be this.

              Comment


              • The J6 organizers reported plenty of briefings with congress people. From a


                And Gosar, who has been one of the most prominent defenders of the Jan. 6 rioters, allegedly took things a step further. Both sources say he dangled the possibility of a “blanket pardon” in an unrelated ongoing investigation to encourage them to plan the protests.

                “Our impression was that it was a done deal,” the organizer says, “that he’d spoken to the president about it in the Oval … in a meeting about pardons and that our names came up. They were working on submitting the paperwork and getting members of the House Freedom Caucus to sign on as a show of support.”

                The organizer claims the pair received “several assurances” about the “blanket pardon” from Gosar....


                In another indication members of Congress may have been involved in planning the protests against the election, Ali Alexander, who helped organize the “Wild Protest,” declared in a since-deleted livestream broadcast that Gosar, Brooks, and Biggs helped him formulate the strategy for that event. ...


                “I was the person who came up with the Jan. 6 idea with Congressman Gosar, Congressman Mo Brooks, and Congressman Andy Biggs,” Alexander said at the time. “We four schemed up on putting maximum pressure on Congress while they were voting so that — who we couldn’t lobby — we could change the hearts and the minds of Republicans who were in that body hearing our loud roar from outside.”

                Alexander led Stop the Steal, which was one of the main groups promoting efforts to dispute Trump’s loss. In December, he organized a Stop the Steal event in Phoenix, where Gosar was one the main speakers. At that demonstration, Alexander referred to Gosar as “my captain” and declared “one of the other heroes has been Congressman Andy Biggs.”


                https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...house-1245289/

                Comment


                • Originally posted by dabrockster View Post

                  Despite a lot of speculation, there’s no evidence that any Republican U.S. senators were involved in planning or taking part in the January 6th attack on the Capitol.

                  Investigations by Congress and law enforcement found no senators tied to organizing or encouraging violence. Some, like Josh Hawley and Ted Cruz, objected to the election results through legal procedures, but that’s very different from participating in the riot itself.

                  Seriously. Please provide proof of your statement. Banks, foxnews, individual citizens and now senators. Expanding to say senators were trying to over throw the govt. The next conspirator movement sine 9/11’ers will be this.
                  Replace Trump in 2020 with Biden. Suppose Biden has lied endlessly about the outcome of the election, was caught pressuring a democratic governor to 'find votes', letting his lawyers attack innocent pollsters, publicly urging VP Harris to not certify the results, colluding with democratic senators who know better (should?) like Lee/Cruz/Hawley who are publicly advocating for ways to overturn the election based on lies, all leading up to Biden riling up a dangerous mob to attack Congress.

                  Are you telling me you wouldn't want a shit ton of subpoenas targeting Democrats? Would you want them to throw some the GOP way as a show of fairness?

                  Come. On. It is so depressing that it's only been 5 years and the shock level has worn off and the nation has forgotten just how bad it was on January 6th. You remember that right? It was about the furthest from 'both sides' political scandal/emergency we could have. Of course an investigation would overwhelmingly target republicans. They were the ones involved!
                  "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
                  "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
                  - SeattleUte

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post

                    Replace Trump in 2020 with Biden. Suppose Biden has lied endlessly about the outcome of the election, was caught pressuring a democratic governor to 'find votes', letting his lawyers attack innocent pollsters, publicly urging VP Harris to not certify the results, colluding with democratic senators who know better (should?) like Lee/Cruz/Hawley who are publicly advocating for ways to overturn the election based on lies, all leading up to Biden riling up a dangerous mob to attack Congress.

                    Are you telling me you wouldn't want a shit ton of subpoenas targeting Democrats? Would you want them to throw some the GOP way as a show of fairness?

                    Come. On. It is so depressing that it's only been 5 years and the shock level has worn off and the nation has forgotten just how bad it was on January 6th. You remember that right? It was about the furthest from 'both sides' political scandal/emergency we could have. Of course an investigation would overwhelmingly target republicans. They were the ones involved!
                    There is talk about going after committee members who investigated J6.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by dabrockster View Post

                      Despite a lot of speculation, there’s no evidence that any Republican U.S. senators were involved in planning or taking part in the January 6th attack on the Capitol.

                      Investigations by Congress and law enforcement found no senators tied to organizing or encouraging violence. Some, like Josh Hawley and Ted Cruz, objected to the election results through legal procedures, but that’s very different from participating in the riot itself.

                      Seriously. Please provide proof of your statement. Banks, foxnews, individual citizens and now senators. Expanding to say senators were trying to over throw the govt. The next conspirator movement sine 9/11’ers will be this.
                      a lot more illegal stuff happened besides the jan 6 break in

                      hawley giving a fist pump to the protestors was definitely not agreeing with them

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post

                        Replace Trump in 2020 with Biden. Suppose Biden has lied endlessly about the outcome of the election, was caught pressuring a democratic governor to 'find votes', letting his lawyers attack innocent pollsters, publicly urging VP Harris to not certify the results, colluding with democratic senators who know better (should?) like Lee/Cruz/Hawley who are publicly advocating for ways to overturn the election based on lies, all leading up to Biden riling up a dangerous mob to attack Congress.

                        Are you telling me you wouldn't want a shit ton of subpoenas targeting Democrats? Would you want them to throw some the GOP way as a show of fairness?

                        Come. On. It is so depressing that it's only been 5 years and the shock level has worn off and the nation has forgotten just how bad it was on January 6th. You remember that right? It was about the furthest from 'both sides' political scandal/emergency we could have. Of course an investigation would overwhelmingly target republicans. They were the ones involved!
                        If we’re being fair, investigations should be based on what people actually did wrong — not which party they’re in. If Biden had done all that stuff — lying about the election, pressuring officials, stirring up trouble — then sure, he should be investigated too. No one should get a free pass just because of their politics.

                        The problem is, a lot of people feel like the rules aren’t applied evenly. When violence or election denial came from the left — like after 2016 or during the 2017 protests — it didn’t seem to get the same attention or outrage. So it starts to look like justice depends on who’s in charge.

                        What happened on January 6 was obviously serious and needed to be investigated. But the bigger point is that we need one standard for everyone. If you try to mess with an election or encourage violence, it shouldn’t matter what party you belong to but the response should be the same.

                        Waiting for all the shit to fall for the inciting violence from Dems that has caused political assassinations attempts and deaths.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by dabrockster View Post

                          If we’re being fair, investigations should be based on what people actually did wrong — not which party they’re in. If Biden had done all that stuff — lying about the election, pressuring officials, stirring up trouble — then sure, he should be investigated too. No one should get a free pass just because of their politics.

                          The problem is, a lot of people feel like the rules aren’t applied evenly. When violence or election denial came from the left — like after 2016 or during the 2017 protests — it didn’t seem to get the same attention or outrage. So it starts to look like justice depends on who’s in charge.

                          What happened on January 6 was obviously serious and needed to be investigated. But the bigger point is that we need one standard for everyone. If you try to mess with an election or encourage violence, it shouldn’t matter what party you belong to but the response should be the same.

                          Waiting for all the shit to fall for the inciting violence from Dems that has caused political assassinations attempts and deaths.
                          By all means, if you have the receipts where national democratic leaders are publicly inciting violence please share it. Because I want to see it and I'll condemn it. This seems like a good time to share the what kind of peacemaker Trump has been since the very beginning:



                          But if we're just talking about your and others' feels with national democratic leaders specifically encouraging or inciting violence, then there's no point to even try to compare. It's not that left-wing political violence doesn't exist, it's just that it's condemned by all but the fringes on the left. Not so with Trump and his goons. He has a paper trail, and honestly he's proud of it.
                          "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
                          "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
                          - SeattleUte

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X