Originally posted by thesaint258
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hamas big killed
Collapse
X
-
The problem with Barak's proposal was there was a bunch of territory that Israel would not give Palestine for an undisclosed amount of time to be left up to Israel, Israel would have control of the vital water resources, of the Palestinian borders, etc. Palestine would not really be a state.
-
Yes, the PA has a big problem with corruption. Too bad the beacon of light that is Israel treats all Palestinians as second class citizens at best.Originally posted by SeattleUte View PostHas anyone seen Waltz with Bashir? Isn't it great that Israel is the kind of country where a film like that can be made? Isn't it great that Israel is the kind of country where a corrupt Prime Minister can be induced by the will of the people and the political process to resign? Is it the only place in the Middle East that is that way? Hamas, for example, is authoritarian thugs.
In other news, Hamas has actually done a great job of governing the Gaza strip
http://www.kabobfest.com/2010/01/ten...t-in-gaza.html
Comment
-
They most certainly have. Several times. And what did it get them? More terrorism - because they showed weakness...Originally posted by Maximus View PostIsrael has not tried ending the occupation.
Prior to Oslo, Israel agreed to virtually all of the terrorists demands - 1967 borders, self-rule. Access to parts of Jerusalem. And what did it get them? rockets and suicide attacks...
Comment
-
um, link to said proposal?Originally posted by statman View PostThey most certainly have. Several times. And what did it get them? More terrorism - because they showed weakness...
Prior to Oslo, Israel agreed to virtually all of the terrorists demands - 1967 borders, self-rule. Access to parts of Jerusalem. And what did it get them? rockets and suicide attacks...
Comment
-
I get the water issue (I wasn't aware of that), but not the others. While the proposal did allow for indefinite Israeli control in some areas, nearly 75% of the West Bank would've been given to the Palestinians immediately. I don't think it's unreasonable for Israel to want to keep some of the West Bank. It seems like Palestinian negotiators want Israel to give up everything while doing nothing in return.Originally posted by Maximus View PostThe problem with Barak's proposal was there was a bunch of territory that Israel would not give Palestine for an undisclosed amount of time to be left up to Israel, Israel would have control of the vital water resources, of the Palestinian borders, etc. Palestine would not really be a state.Not that, sickos.
Comment
-
Originally posted by byu71 View PostI don't know, but I certainly would be willing to listent to some expert tell me why it doesn't provide additional security for the Israeli's.
I don't even know how to respond to that.
Don't twist my statements like that. It doesn't solve everything but it is most egregious problem in the region at the moment and it has zero justification (other than a naked land grab). GWB was the first president in history to not condemn the settlements and demand that they stop. Obama has at least talked about applying pressure. Unfortunately, no president yet has had the guts to actually put some teeth into the problem. Such as cut back on the multi-billion dollar check we write to Israel each year.Originally posted by byu71 View PostNow, are you sure in your mind that the security of Israel isn't helped? If you are sure, then I guess you don't have to think past stopping them from doing settlements because if the Israeli's stop the settlements everyting will be fine.
Originally posted by byu71 View PostNow, I am willing to listen to you and Maximus and Sloan and Robin for your solutions. However, I want to hear how you will also deal with consequences.
We are already dealing with consequences, amigo.
"There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
Boy that is just nonsense.Originally posted by statman View PostThey most certainly have. Several times. And what did it get them? More terrorism - because they showed weakness...
Prior to Oslo, Israel agreed to virtually all of the terrorists demands - 1967 borders, self-rule. Access to parts of Jerusalem. And what did it get them? rockets and suicide attacks...
And if you define all Palestinians as terrorists then it shows you aren't really interested in looking at the issue objectively."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
-
There were actually three types of areas proposed: PA control, Israeli control, and joint control. You should look at a map of the proposal. The PA-controlled areas were little disjoint islands for the most part. The proposal basically would have codified the existing occupation. And without water and ability to build roads and infrastructure throughout the region, there were have been no real hope to establish a viable economy.Originally posted by thesaint258 View PostI get the water issue (I wasn't aware of that), but not the others. While the proposal did allow for indefinite Israeli control in some areas, nearly 75% of the West Bank would've been given to the Palestinians immediately. I don't think it's unreasonable for Israel to want to keep some of the West Bank. It seems like Palestinian negotiators want Israel to give up everything while doing nothing in return."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
Wasn't the apparent but unstated purpose to assimilate the PA areas into the Israeli economy and society? IOW, the PA would be fractured and unable to control its own infrastructure and so would eventually be co opted by the reality of the Israeli economic and social presence. That's how I understood it, although I could certainly be wrong about it.Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View PostThere were actually three types of areas proposed: PA control, Israeli control, and joint control. You should look at a map of the proposal. The PA-controlled areas were little disjoint islands for the most part. The proposal basically would have codified the existing occupation. And without water and ability to build roads and infrastructure throughout the region, there were have been no real hope to establish a viable economy.PLesa excuse the tpyos.
Comment
-
What a terrible fate.Originally posted by creekster View PostWasn't the apparent but unstated purpose to assimilate the PA areas into the Israeli economy and society? IOW, the PA would be fractured and unable to control its own infrastructure and so would eventually be co opted by the reality of the Israeli economic and social presence. That's how I understood it, although I could certainly be wrong about it.
Yes, this kind of thing happened to Japanese and German fascism vis-a-vis Western democratic and socialist institutions. Liberty assimilates irresistably. Ironically, it also permits a people to maintain their culture and traditions with its framework, even as they realize their potential to prosper.When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
--Jonathan Swift
Comment
-
I am sure the Palestinians would be ecstatic if Israel treated them the way the US treated the conquered Germans and Japanese.Originally posted by SeattleUte View PostWhat a terrible fate.
Yes, this kind of thing happened to Japanese and German fascism vis-a-vis Western democratic and socialist institutions. Liberty assimilates irresistably. Ironically, it also permits a people to maintain their culture and traditions with its framework, even as they realize their potential to prosper."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
The German and Japanese people never did want WWII. Their leaders, however, did. Hamas does not want the Palestinian people to be assimilated in Israel, even if they retain their tradiations and culture. If you think otherwise you're naive.Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View PostI am sure the Palestinians would be ecstatic if Israel treated them the way the US treated the conquered Germans and Japanese.When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
--Jonathan Swift
Comment
-
I don't really have anything to add, I just want to be able to tell my grandkids I was involved with the process.Originally posted by Coach McGuirk View Postwe're so close to having this figured out. I can almost taste it!There's no such thing as luck, only drunken invincibility. Make it happen.
Tila Tequila and Juggalos, America’s saddest punchline since the South.
Yesterday was Thursday, Thursday
Today is Friday, Friday (Partyin’)
…
Tomorrow is Saturday
And Sunday comes afterwards
Comment
Comment