Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

General Upgrades & Ideas

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pelado
    replied
    Originally posted by Bo Diddley View Post
    And let the record show after P-lad passed up such a softball he might just be growing up.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bo Diddley
    replied
    And let the record show after P-lad passed up such a softball he might just be growing up.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pelado
    replied
    Originally posted by Donuthole View Post
    Your log won’t be perfectly round. By routering it to a perfect round you’ll be able to replicate the shape in your routered inset. I think chamfering the end of the routered end will make it easier to slide fully into the routered inset. You could also just bevel it. But something to taper the last 1/4” of the end to make it easier to slot in.

    EDIT: I’m envisioning a profile like this:
    IMG_6654.jpeg
    Thanks for the diagram and explainer.

    The chamfer or bevel might make it easier to slot in, but if I leave each half-log with just the inverse of the routered inset, then that should leave me with a tighter mechanical fit, more glueable surface area, and - I would think - a more solid joint.

    Leave a comment:


  • Donuthole
    replied
    Originally posted by Pelado View Post

    I like it. the wider log will provide greater stability and using half of it as one leg and half as the other leg should make the piece look more consistent, too. I'm not sure what benefit will be derived from the chamfered edge, though. Please enlighten me, if possible.
    Your log won’t be perfectly round. By routering it to a perfect round you’ll be able to replicate the shape in your routered inset. I think chamfering the end of the routered end will make it easier to slide fully into the routered inset. You could also just bevel it. But something to taper the last 1/4” of the end to make it easier to slot in.

    EDIT: I’m envisioning a profile like this:
    IMG_6654.jpeg

    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Pelado
    replied
    Originally posted by Donuthole View Post

    I would find a piece of firewood at least 10" in diameter and cut it into two pieces to make the fat legs. Then, at the ends where you cut it, where the wood is exactly the same thickness, chamfer the end to a depth of about 1.25". Measure your chamfered circle and router the same size circles into the bottom of the bench seat about 1" deep. Dry fit it to make sure it's reasonably tight, then glue the crap out of it and pound it together. Maybe clamp or use weights for continuous pressure.
    I like it. the wider log will provide greater stability and using half of it as one leg and half as the other leg should make the piece look more consistent, too. I'm not sure what benefit will be derived from the chamfered edge, though. Please enlighten me, if possible.

    Leave a comment:


  • Donuthole
    replied
    Originally posted by Pelado View Post


    Im still considering what to use for legs on the other two slabs as well as what joint to use. I'm thinking to just use a single round of repurposed firewood (5-8 inches in diameter) for each side of each slab. I'm thinking to use the router to remove an inch or two of depth on the bottom surface of each slab to allow the round to seat into the area. But I'm open to suggestions.
    I would find a piece of firewood at least 10" in diameter and cut it into two pieces to make the fat legs. Then, at the ends where you cut it, where the wood is exactly the same thickness, chamfer the end to a depth of about 1.25". Measure your chamfered circle and router the same size circles into the bottom of the bench seat about 1" deep. Dry fit it to make sure it's reasonably tight, then glue the crap out of it and pound it together. Maybe clamp or use weights for continuous pressure.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pelado
    replied
    Originally posted by Pelado View Post
    I'm feeling better about the epoxy right now.

    I lightly sanded each board with 220 grit Cubitron paper using a random orbital sander and then used isopropyl alcohol to wipe off the residue. I didn't bother with the tape dams this time.

    I mixed up a smaller batch of epoxy and poured a small quantity of epoxy on the first board, then rolled the epoxy out over the board. I continued that process with each subsequent board and then continued rolling the epoxy around the various boards for at least an hour or two.

    The epoxy is still drying, so maybe this is premature, but it's looking a lot closer to what I wanted now.

    20240611_083312.jpg
    The second round of epoxy was much better than the first, but not perfect. There are still a few small spots on the top surface that absorbed all the epoxy, making thise spots rough to the touch. Additionally, I didn't get a consistent coating of epoxy on the sides, so it's blotchy there.

    I'm considering another round of epoxy, but am leaning more towards just doing a few layers of sprayed polyurethane.

    I got the legs on the two flat-ish slabs. I drilled a hole using a 1-inch forster bit near each of the four corners on the bottom surface of the two slabs.

    I perused the firewood pile and found a few pieces of the appropriate width and length for legs. I was planning to remove all the bark and whittle down to bare wood so I removed as much bark as I could by hand. I haven't removed the rest of the bark, though, so the surface of each leg looks somewhat inconsistent. I'm leaning toward just spraying it as is.

    After squaring off the ends of each prospective leg on the miter saw, I chisled away material from the top 1-2 inches, leaving a cylinder of approximately 1-inch diameter to act as a tenon. In retrospect, it probably would have been quicker, easier, and maybe even stronger to use dowels instead.

    On the first slab I did (the wider one) I was a bit too anxious to start gluing, so I didn't do any planing on the bottom surface of the slab. Once the legs were glued in, I started worrying a bit about the gaps. I considered waiting until the glue dried and then filling them with epoxy but opted instead for packing the gaps with a homemade filler - the wood shavings from planing the narrower slab mixed with Titebond 3 wood glue. The joints feel very solid now.

    Im still considering what to use for legs on the other two slabs as well as what joint to use. I'm thinking to just use a single round of repurposed firewood (5-8 inches in diameter) for each side of each slab. I'm thinking to use the router to remove an inch or two of depth on the bottom surface of each slab to allow the round to seat into the area. But I'm open to suggestions.
    20240617_150023.jpg 20240617_150015.jpg 20240617_150153.jpg

    Leave a comment:


  • Moliere
    replied
    Looks pretty good!

    Leave a comment:


  • Pelado
    replied
    Originally posted by Pelado View Post
    The boards should definitely be dry. I was actually more concerned about rot and/or bug damage.

    Looking at the current state of the epoxy, I'm not particularly pleased. When I first poured out the epoxy, I made sure to break the surface tension everywhere with my gloved hand. In spots, it seems to have soaked up the epoxy so much that it feels and looks although no epoxy was applied at all. In other places, the epoxy is pooled as if there were surface tension preventing it from free flowing and self-leveling. I noticed the potential for that while it was setting, but didn't want to introduce more air bubbles trying to manipulate it more than I already had.

    I might need to do another round or two of epoxy before I move onto the polyurethane since the boards aren't nearly as smooth as I was expecting them to be.

    Thank goodness I'm going for rustic.
    I'm feeling better about the epoxy right now.

    I lightly sanded each board with 220 grit Cubitron paper using a random orbital sander and then used isopropyl alcohol to wipe off the residue. I didn't bother with the tape dams this time.

    I mixed up a smaller batch of epoxy and poured a small quantity of epoxy on the first board, then rolled the epoxy out over the board. I continued that process with each subsequent board and then continued rolling the epoxy around the various boards for at least an hour or two.

    The epoxy is still drying, so maybe this is premature, but it's looking a lot closer to what I wanted now.

    20240611_083312.jpg

    Leave a comment:


  • Pelado
    replied
    Originally posted by Moliere View Post
    FYI, your call on using a power planer is the right call. I have one and use it mostly for outside projects. I spent the better part of an hour yesterday planing down a raised root. It worked well. The epoxy is a good call on the boards. I just hope they are dry or you might have issues with them in the future, but if rustic is the look you are going for you’ll probably be fine with it.
    The boards should definitely be dry. I was actually more concerned about rot and/or bug damage.

    Looking at the current state of the epoxy, I'm not particularly pleased. When I first poured out the epoxy, I made sure to break the surface tension everywhere with my gloved hand. In spots, it seems to have soaked up the epoxy so much that it feels and looks although no epoxy was applied at all. In other places, the epoxy is pooled as if there were surface tension preventing it from free flowing and self-leveling. I noticed the potential for that while it was setting, but didn't want to introduce more air bubbles trying to manipulate it more than I already had.

    I might need to do another round or two of epoxy before I move onto the polyurethane since the boards aren't nearly as smooth as I was expecting them to be.

    Thank goodness I'm going for rustic.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moliere
    replied
    FYI, your call on using a power planer is the right call. I have one and use it mostly for outside projects. I spent the better part of an hour yesterday planing down a raised root. It worked well. The epoxy is a good call on the boards. I just hope they are dry or you might have issues with them in the future, but if rustic is the look you are going for you’ll probably be fine with it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Copelius
    replied
    Originally posted by Pelado View Post

    I had a brilliant idea about cutting a grid pattern in the stump with the circular saw that was much less effective in practice than it was in my mind.
    I have done similar with much smaller stumps. Didn't work out for me either, even trying to use a sledge once the crosscutting was done.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pelado
    replied
    Originally posted by BigFatMeanie View Post

    What did you try that wasn't effective? Your bare hands?
    I had a brilliant idea about cutting a grid pattern in the stump with the circular saw that was much less effective in practice than it was in my mind.

    Leave a comment:


  • BigFatMeanie
    replied
    Originally posted by Pelado View Post
    This spring, I started working on it. In lieu of a stump grinder, I used several other tools. What seemed to be most effective were the shovel, chainsaw, reciprocating saw with pruning blade, maul, and the breaker bar. The breaker bar was also instrumental in providing leverage for me to more the huge rocks so I could get easier access to the stump and so I could dig down a bit to lower the huge rocks and make the new hydrangeas and flowers more visible from the front of the house.
    What did you try that wasn't effective? Your bare hands?

    Leave a comment:


  • USUC
    replied
    The placement of the trees makes it problematic for sure. There are a lot of trees around my parents property. Whenever a tree needed to go, we just drilled holes in the stump and used potassium nitrate or something similar. After a year or two they'd just fall apart. We also had a tractor that could just pull smaller stumps out.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X