Members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in the News

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Omaha 680
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 11170

    #451
    Originally posted by Bo Diddley View Post
    Actually there are ranger battalions in the National Guard. So they could be called upon for action on US soil. I remember toting a gun on the streets of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina as a guardsman. However, in the early days after the hurricane, there were also regular army soldiers doing the same. So they've already broken the Posse Comitatus Act before.
    I believe the National Guard are allowed to operate in a state under Posse Comitatus if invited by the Governor.

    Edit: I read your post wrong. You already said that essentially.
    Last edited by Omaha 680; 04-25-2014, 12:41 PM.

    Comment

    • SeattleUte
      Faith crisis consultant
      • Nov 2008
      • 20837

      #452
      Originally posted by cowboy View Post
      Yeah, assuming Bundy's supporters are ranchers/cowboys is like assuming everyone who wears a cowboy hat can ride a horse. I'd bet that not one of the Bundy compound outside the family actually owns cows or could even trail a thirsty cow to water. These people are wannabe mercenaries. SU's characterization reinforces my fear, though, that every rancher with a grievance will henceforth be lumped together as a Bundyite .

      To your question, I believe that the best way to solve the problem is to place a lien on the cattle and work with the state to not let cattle leave the property without a transfer of ownership to the BLM. Legally, cattle cannot change counties in the West without a brand inspection, and they cannot be sold without a brand inspection transferring title. Further, anything with Bundy's brand would have a lien, no matter where it came from or was sold, that would require sale proceeds to go to the lienholder. Banks do it all the time, and it's pretty effective. This is the nice thing about western states that have strictly enforced brand laws.


      I figured someone would bust me on this. My point was that these guys are jokers when compared to any real tactical unit. They're out-manned, outgunned, and outclassed.
      cowboy, you may think I'm an effete civil rights lawyer from Seattle clueless about your way of life, but my grandpa (who I knew well) owned a ranch in Utah that is still in the family, and as a boy he herded sheep and was very poor. He taught me to ride a horse and split logs with an ax. I get Bundy for better or worse. I'd invoke Godwin's rule to any comparisons of him to Hitler. I embrace Mormons as being a part of me just as I embrace the Franks, the Batavians, the Angles, and the Saxons as being a part of me. Bundy is what he is and a lot of cowboys are like him. I agree not all of them are.

      EDIT: McCarthy's Border Trilogy is one of my favorite books. And strangely enough this Bundy standoff got me thinking of some of the themes in that great literary work.
      When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.

      --Jonathan Swift

      Comment

      • TripletDaddy
        sweet triple
        • Nov 2008
        • 58186

        #453
        Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
        He taught me to ride a horse and split logs with an ax.
        lol @ goatnapper'96. SeattleUte is a more skilled rancher.
        Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

        sigpic

        Comment

        • RC Vikings
          Known Heterosexual
          • Nov 2008
          • 8788

          #454
          The Las Vegas Review-Journal is Nevada's most trusted source for local news, Las Vegas sports, business news, gaming news, entertainment news and more.


          0.jpg

          Bundy's son is a proud BYU supporter. This just looks bad.

          Comment

          • cowboy
            Homer Weems
            • Dec 2008
            • 5740

            #455
            Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
            cowboy, you may think I'm an effete civil rights lawyer from Seattle clueless about your way of life, but my grandpa (who I knew well) owned a ranch in Utah that is still in the family, and as a boy he herded sheep and was very poor. He taught me to ride a horse and split logs with an ax. I get Bundy for better or worse. I'd invoke Godwin's rule to any comparisons of him to Hitler. I embrace Mormons as being a part of me just as I embrace the Franks, the Batavians, the Angles, and the Saxons as being a part of me. Bundy is what he is and a lot of cowboys are like him. I agree not all of them are.

            EDIT: McCarthy's Border Trilogy is one of my favorite books. And strangely enough this Bundy standoff got me thinking of some of the themes in that great literary work.
            Please expound. I'll not deny there is plenty of anti-government sentiment, racism and homophobia among cowboys, ranchers, and just rural white folks in general. But there are very few country folk who are willing to take up arms against a government agency; we're not all a bunch of Freemen. To the racism, etc., it has been my experience that rural folk say offensive and very politically incorrect things from time to time, but when push comes to shove, they are pretty accepting.
            sigpic
            "Outlined against a blue, gray
            October sky the Four Horsemen rode again"
            Grantland Rice, 1924

            Comment

            • RC Vikings
              Known Heterosexual
              • Nov 2008
              • 8788

              #456
              Originally posted by cowboy View Post
              To the racism, etc., it has been my experience that rural folk say offensive and very politically incorrect things from time to time, but when push comes to shove, they are pretty accepting.
              :thumbsup:

              Comment

              • SeattleUte
                Faith crisis consultant
                • Nov 2008
                • 20837

                #457
                Originally posted by cowboy View Post
                Please expound. I'll not deny there is plenty of anti-government sentiment, racism and homophobia among cowboys, ranchers, and just rural white folks in general. But there are very few country folk who are willing to take up arms against a government agency; we're not all a bunch of Freemen. To the racism, etc., it has been my experience that rural folk say offensive and very politically incorrect things from time to time, but when push comes to shove, they are pretty accepting.
                I agree with this.
                When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.

                --Jonathan Swift

                Comment

                • Northwestcoug
                  Cocked and Loaded
                  • May 2011
                  • 17920

                  #458
                  Originally posted by cowboy View Post
                  To your question, I believe that the best way to solve the problem is to place a lien on the cattle and work with the state to not let cattle leave the property without a transfer of ownership to the BLM. Legally, cattle cannot change counties in the West without a brand inspection, and they cannot be sold without a brand inspection transferring title. Further, anything with Bundy's brand would have a lien, no matter where it came from or was sold, that would require sale proceeds to go to the lienholder. Banks do it all the time, and it's pretty effective. This is the nice thing about western states that have strictly enforced brand laws.
                  Really not knowing anything about the cattle business, this sounds like a very reasonable solution.
                  "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
                  "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
                  - SeattleUte

                  Comment

                  • Jeff Lebowski
                    Corporate lackey for Jesus
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 69466

                    #459
                    Originally posted by cowboy View Post
                    Yeah, assuming Bundy's supporters are ranchers/cowboys is like assuming everyone who wears a cowboy hat can ride a horse. I'd bet that not one of the Bundy compound outside the family actually owns cows or could even trail a thirsty cow to water. These people are wannabe mercenaries. SU's characterization reinforces my fear, though, that every rancher with a grievance will henceforth be lumped together as a Bundyite .
                    Exactly.

                    Originally posted by cowboy View Post
                    To your question, I believe that the best way to solve the problem is to place a lien on the cattle and work with the state to not let cattle leave the property without a transfer of ownership to the BLM. Legally, cattle cannot change counties in the West without a brand inspection, and they cannot be sold without a brand inspection transferring title. Further, anything with Bundy's brand would have a lien, no matter where it came from or was sold, that would require sale proceeds to go to the lienholder. Banks do it all the time, and it's pretty effective. This is the nice thing about western states that have strictly enforced brand laws.
                    That sounds like a very sensible plan. I hope they do something like this.
                    "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                    "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                    "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                    Comment

                    • Jeff Lebowski
                      Corporate lackey for Jesus
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 69466

                      #460
                      Originally posted by cowboy View Post
                      Please expound. I'll not deny there is plenty of anti-government sentiment, racism and homophobia among cowboys, ranchers, and just rural white folks in general. But there are very few country folk who are willing to take up arms against a government agency; we're not all a bunch of Freemen. To the racism, etc., it has been my experience that rural folk say offensive and very politically incorrect things from time to time, but when push comes to shove, they are pretty accepting.
                      This is true. I have relatives that have said (and sometimes still say) some really dumb and offensive things. But most of it comes from culture and ignorance and they are good people.

                      That being said, Bundy's comments about picking cotton and blacks maybe being better off under slavery are among the most vile and offensive things one could say. That takes the concept of a brain fart/stupid comment to a whole new level.
                      "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                      "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                      "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                      Comment

                      • old_gregg
                        scaly man fish
                        • Nov 2009
                        • 16915

                        #461
                        Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
                        lol @ goatnapper'96. SeattleUte is a more skilled rancher.
                        "split logs with an axe" is a euphemism in this context, hope that helps.
                        Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est.

                        Comment

                        • Solon
                          Lost in the flood
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 5747

                          #462
                          Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
                          Bundy's comments about picking cotton and blacks maybe being better off under slavery are among the most vile and offensive things one could say.
                          This was a surprisingly common point-of-view 50 years ago. Historians now suggest that the movie Gone With The Wind has contributed as much to this misconception as anything because of how its slaves relate to their owners in that film. Gone With the Wind might be the most viewed movie ever made, making this misconception all the more pervasive.

                          (it's called the paternalism doctrine - that owners looked after their slaves as a kindly father looks after his children. This is indeed how slave-owners often claimed moral authority for engaging in slavery, claiming that wayward slaves needed a firm but loving hand, but it's patently ridiculous. Historian Eugene Genovese dismantled this ideology in the 1960s with his book Roll, Jordan Roll, but the damage had been done).
                          "More crazy people to Provo go than to any other town in the state."
                          -- Iron County Record. 23 August, 1912. (http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lc...23/ed-1/seq-4/)

                          Comment

                          • cowboy
                            Homer Weems
                            • Dec 2008
                            • 5740

                            #463
                            Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
                            That being said, Bundy's comments about picking cotton and blacks maybe being better off under slavery are among the most vile and offensive things one could say. That takes the concept of a brain fart/stupid comment to a whole new level.
                            I agree. My hell, I haven't heard anything that reprehensible for years. I was in town today and stopped to talk to a group of retired folks I know, and they all said they sympathized with him until he opined on the merits of slavery. Now they unanimously think he's a nut, and they are his same generation with the same culturally biased upbringing.
                            sigpic
                            "Outlined against a blue, gray
                            October sky the Four Horsemen rode again"
                            Grantland Rice, 1924

                            Comment

                            • YOhio
                              Hipster Mode
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 26165

                              #464
                              One positive takeaway from all of this is that it's tons of fun to say,"let me tell you one thing I know about the [whatever]." Then you go on and same some batshit crazy nonsense about whatever and everyone laughs. I mean, at least at some point I think they'll laugh. They should.

                              Comment

                              • SeattleUte
                                Faith crisis consultant
                                • Nov 2008
                                • 20837

                                #465
                                Originally posted by cowboy View Post
                                To your question, I believe that the best way to solve the problem is to place a lien on the cattle and work with the state to not let cattle leave the property without a transfer of ownership to the BLM. Legally, cattle cannot change counties in the West without a brand inspection, and they cannot be sold without a brand inspection transferring title. Further, anything with Bundy's brand would have a lien, no matter where it came from or was sold, that would require sale proceeds to go to the lienholder. Banks do it all the time, and it's pretty effective. This is the nice thing about western states that have strictly enforced brand laws.
                                This must be the way it's done already. The lien is what gives the government the right to arrest the cattle. They will then auction them in a sherriff's sale to satisfy the lien to the extent funds are availalbe. The Bundys will get what's left over if anything.

                                cowboy, you may be able to pick up some of Bundy's livestock at distressed prices.
                                When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.

                                --Jonathan Swift

                                Comment

                                Working...