Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If a female tried to get into the priesthood session of GC...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Solon View Post
    I go back and forth on the idea ordaining LDS females.

    In general, I think it's a good step for women in the faith.
    On the other hand, Mormonism seems to have some fundamental beliefs about the nature of men & women that ordained women might not feel comfortable supporting.

    LDS women asking for priesthood is a little like African Americans asking to join the Confederate army.
    Very little.
    PLesa excuse the tpyos.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Solon View Post
      I go back and forth on the idea ordaining LDS females.

      In general, I think it's a good step for women in the faith.
      On the other hand, Mormonism seems to have some fundamental beliefs about the nature of men & women that ordained women might not feel comfortable supporting.

      LDS women asking for priesthood is a little like African Americans asking to join the Confederate army.
      LDS women asking for priesthood is like you even pretending you're fully authorized to make comments on the African American mindset.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by clackamascoug View Post
        LDS women asking for priesthood is like you even pretending you're fully authorized to make comments on the African American mindset.
        I'm a lot of things, clack, some good; some bad. I never claimed to speak for African Americans.
        The notion that we can only speak about things that we have experienced firsthand is trivial and stupid. Can you draw opinions based on historical circumstances? Should it matter that you're not a Macedonian, a Mongol, or a Moor?

        Why don't you try addressing the analogy on its own merits, rather than suggest that someone doesn't have the right to think about stuff?
        Or should I assume that you are not fully authorized to make comments on the mindset of someone engaging in a constructive dialogue?

        PS - remember I wrote "a little like" before the hyperbole criticisms come pouring in.
        "More crazy people to Provo go than to any other town in the state."
        -- Iron County Record. 23 August, 1912. (http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lc...23/ed-1/seq-4/)

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Solon View Post
          I'm a lot of things, clack, some good; some bad. I never claimed to speak for African Americans.
          The notion that we can only speak about things that we have experienced firsthand is trivial and stupid. Can you draw opinions based on historical circumstances? Should it matter that you're not a Macedonian, a Mongol, or a Moor?

          Why don't you try addressing the analogy on its own merits, rather than suggest that someone doesn't have the right to think about stuff?
          Or should I assume that you are not fully authorized to make comments on the mindset of someone engaging in a constructive dialogue?

          PS - remember I wrote "a little like" before the hyperbole criticisms come pouring in.
          I should have toned it down, but my clever pride got before me. I can see how it could come across mean. Sorry, didn't mean to step on any toes.

          BTW... I might be a Mongrel so easy on the Moob finger pointing.

          Whenever I contemplate the women and the priesthood issue, I hearken back to Jesus Christ and what we know of His works and intentions whilst about His Fathers business here on Earth. Being omnipotent as he was, and the "smartest guy in the room" if it would have been integral to the Gospel Plan for women to participate more fully in the New and Improved Gospel, that would have been a good time to invite women to participate with men on the same Priesthood level. Two horses pulling the same plow comes to mind, but He didn't set it up that way.

          Maybe the hierarchical order that we have currently have is actually the Lords wish, for reasons that are beyond our pay grade to know currently, and that we will have a full understanding of The Gospel when all of our dimensional experiences collapse into one super cool (smart) eternal being.
          Last edited by clackamascoug; 04-26-2015, 02:56 PM.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Solon View Post
            I'm a lot of things, clack, some good; some bad. I never claimed to speak for African Americans.
            The notion that we can only speak about things that we have experienced firsthand is trivial and stupid. Can you draw opinions based on historical circumstances? Should it matter that you're not a Macedonian, a Mongol, or a Moor?

            Why don't you try addressing the analogy on its own merits, rather than suggest that someone doesn't have the right to think about stuff?
            Or should I assume that you are not fully authorized to make comments on the mindset of someone engaging in a constructive dialogue?

            PS - remember I wrote "a little like" before the hyperbole criticisms come pouring in.
            My problem is with the analogy. It's a little correct like women can be a little pregnant. Just MO.
            PLesa excuse the tpyos.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Solon View Post
              The notion that we can only speak about things that we have experienced firsthand is trivial and stupid.
              I agree completely.
              "What are you prepared to do?" - Jimmy Malone

              "What choice?" - Abe Petrovsky

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Joe Public View Post
                I agree completely.
                How would you know that?
                τὸν ἥλιον ἀνατέλλοντα πλείονες ἢ δυόμενον προσκυνοῦσιν

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Solon View Post
                  I go back and forth on the idea ordaining LDS females.

                  In general, I think it's a good step for women in the faith.
                  On the other hand, Mormonism seems to have some fundamental beliefs about the nature of men & women that ordained women might not feel comfortable supporting.

                  LDS women asking for priesthood is a little like African Americans asking to join the Confederate army.
                  http://www.deseretnews.com/article/8...residents.html

                  I agree. To me an article like this list of "Mission Presidents and Wives" is a good litmus test. I'm sure most LDS people think it's good and normal to include the professions of all of the Presidents but NONE of the Presidents' Wives. I think it's ridiculous. They should have similar bios for the men and women. Also I don't get why both the husband and the wife can't be called together as Presidents of the Mission or whatever else they want to call it so the couple has equal billing.

                  Women shouldn't want to sign up for the Priesthood until or unless a lot of this stupid sexist stuff in the Church gets fixed also.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by clackamascoug View Post
                    I should have toned it down, but my clever pride got before me. I can see how it could come across mean. Sorry, didn't mean to step on any toes.

                    BTW... I might be a Mongrel so easy on the Moob finger pointing.

                    Whenever I contemplate the women and the priesthood issue, I hearken back to Jesus Christ and what we know of His works and intentions whilst about His Fathers business here on Earth. Being omnipotent as he was, and the "smartest guy in the room" if it would have been integral to the Gospel Plan for women to participate more fully in the New and Improved Gospel, that would have been a good time to invite women to participate with men on the same Priesthood level. Two horses pulling the same plow comes to mind, but He didn't set it up that way.

                    Maybe the hierarchical order that we have currently have is actually the Lords wish, for reasons that are beyond our pay grade to know currently, and that we will have a full understanding of The Gospel when all of our dimensional experiences collapse into one super cool (smart) eternal being.
                    i for one am really glad that jesus didn't decide blacks weren't an important component of his church until 1978.
                    Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by clackamascoug View Post
                      I should have toned it down, but my clever pride got before me. I can see how it could come across mean. Sorry, didn't mean to step on any toes.

                      BTW... I might be a Mongrel so easy on the Moob finger pointing.

                      Whenever I contemplate the women and the priesthood issue, I hearken back to Jesus Christ and what we know of His works and intentions whilst about His Fathers business here on Earth. Being omnipotent as he was, and the "smartest guy in the room" if it would have been integral to the Gospel Plan for women to participate more fully in the New and Improved Gospel, that would have been a good time to invite women to participate with men on the same Priesthood level. Two horses pulling the same plow comes to mind, but He didn't set it up that way.

                      Maybe the hierarchical order that we have currently have is actually the Lords wish, for reasons that are beyond our pay grade to know currently, and that we will have a full understanding of The Gospel when all of our dimensional experiences collapse into one super cool (smart) eternal being.
                      It seems to me that God works within the context of the culture we have here on Earth. It wasn't until the civil rights movement broke down artificial barriers that the revelation came for all worthy men to be able to have the priesthood. Similarly, I would not be shocked one day to find that women can receive the priesthood.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Bo Diddley View Post
                        It seems to me that God works within the context of the culture we have here on Earth. It wasn't until the civil rights movement broke down artificial barriers that the revelation came for all worthy men to be able to have the priesthood. Similarly, I would not be shocked one day to find that women can receive the priesthood.
                        yeah turns out that god dude actually is a respecter of persons when it's politically expedient
                        Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est.

                        Comment


                        • All of the above points are good, which makes the situation all the more baffling.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by old_gregg View Post
                            yeah turns out that god dude actually is a respecter of persons when it's politically expedient
                            Right. He should have given people (including us) the Gospel in it's purest form through all generations, because he's no respecter of persons. I wonder why political expediency seems to play such a prominent role? Regardless of the reasons, it certainly does.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Bo Diddley View Post
                              Right. He should have given people (including us) the Gospel in it's purest form through all generations, because he's no respecter of persons. I wonder why political expediency seems to play such a prominent role? Regardless of the reasons, it certainly does.
                              there is a very simple explanation
                              Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by old_gregg View Post
                                there is a very simple explanation
                                Well as long as it's simple...it must be right.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X