Lust

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Indy Coug
    Heartless Bastard
    • Dec 2008
    • 18747

    #31
    Originally posted by Donuthole View Post
    Was that really SWK's last quote? What a way to go out.
    Can someone please fill in the ellipsis part of SWK's quote?
    Everything in life is an approximation.

    http://twitter.com/CougarStats

    Comment

    • smokymountainrain
      Impressive Member
      • Nov 2008
      • 22593

      #32
      Originally posted by Donuthole View Post
      Was that really SWK's last quote? What a way to go out.
      <flips DH the bird>

      For some reason I was thinking they were all SWK quotes. That said, for all I know that really was his last quote.
      I'm like LeBron James.
      -mpfunk

      Comment

      • Northwestcoug
        Cocked and Loaded
        • May 2011
        • 18047

        #33
        Originally posted by smokymountainrain View Post
        I should have been more clear. SWK's last quote.
        Sorry. My apologies. Now I've gone and admitted to much
        "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
        "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
        - SeattleUte

        Comment

        • Pheidippides
          Liberal Feminazi
          • Nov 2008
          • 14759

          #34
          Originally posted by Indy Coug View Post
          There's far more sexual dysfunction in the church due to the pervasive influences of pornography and uber-permissive cultural influences than there is due to a handful of hyperbolic teachings about the importance of being chaste before marriage.
          I couldn't disagree with you in this more strongly if I tried.
          Awesomeness now has a name. Let me introduce myself.

          Comment

          • UtahDan
            *
            • Nov 2008
            • 14496

            #35
            Originally posted by Katy Lied View Post
            Rambam on his favorite strategy: take something common to a wider audience (in this case, Christendom), narrowly redefine it as a mormon phenomenon, and then bewail the fact that we are so odd, so different than others, such misfits.

            3 Nephi 12:28 is word-for-word in the New Testament, in the Sermon on the Mount.

            Born Again Jimmy Carter referred to this very scripture when he made his infamous confession in Playboy Magazine that he had lusted after many women in his heart. So your correlation between young LDS boys can be broadened to any young christian boy, including catholics about which this issue is widely written.

            If you want to talk about sexual dysfunction, you don't have to do it in the context of mormonism in order to discuss it on CUF.
            You know that every time a Mormon argues that her church is just like every other Christian church that one of Satan's angels gets its wings, or a kitten dies, or something, right?

            Comment

            • UtahDan
              *
              • Nov 2008
              • 14496

              #36
              Originally posted by Mormon Red Death View Post
              Honestly I don't think men have a problem with this. I would say what you are talking about is more of a problem with women. the old "good girl" situation.
              This is exactly my sense. Certainly there are some men who are afflicted by scrupulousity because of inability to control sexual or carnal thoughts. But there is a least a great deal more talk about female sexual dysfunction.

              I think we have had this conversation (not you and me MRD, all of us) in lots of other threads. I think it boils down to this: putting a high premium on chastity (sin next to murder) is going to create some unintended consequences re: sexual health and attitudes for some indeterminate slice of the population and will push people to be married young which has its own challenges. HOWEVER, many think that these consequences (which admittedly are not easily quantified) are either not significant or, even if they are significant, are worth paying because one believes that sexual sin causes severe spiritual, emotion, etc., harm.

              What that cost benefit analysis computes for any individual will be almost completely a function of whether they think the church is right about how serious and damaging the sin is. We can argue some of the evidence that surrounds this, but at the end of the day I think it winds up being a matter of personal belief and faith.

              Comment

              • Scorcho
                Junior Member
                • Aug 2011
                • 835

                #37
                I do believe the LDS Church is a little more open about sexual intimacy than it used to be. There has always been too much emphasis on the evils of pre-marital sex, adultery and self pleasure and virtually nothing about the positives of sexual activity. I think the outcome of that has been that there are still too many couples marrying simply to satisfy their sexual desires and then 2-3 years into the marriage divorcing because they really don’t have much other compatibility. That is tragic, and in my opinion it would have been better if they had just had a sexual relationship before marriage and been spared the heartache of dealing with divorce, children, etc.

                It’s also my understanding that the church has been much more lenient in regards to couples that are dating preparing for marriage and then slip. I think that’s a positive. I think LDS Leaders have learned that too severe a punishment on a couple for pre-marital sexual transgressions results in forcing them away from the gospel, rather than drawing them closer.

                Lust is certainly a paradox for all LDS Members.

                Comment

                • Jeff Lebowski
                  Corporate lackey for Jesus
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 69773

                  #38
                  I remember many years ago not long after we were married I was sitting in an EQ meeting and the instructor went on and on about how lust is evil and that we should not even lust after our own wives. Remarkably, nobody challenged him on it (to my regret). I thought it was the dumbest thing I had ever heard.
                  "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                  "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                  "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                  Comment

                  • Indy Coug
                    Heartless Bastard
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 18747

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
                    I remember many years ago not long after we were married I was sitting in an EQ meeting and the instructor went on and on about how lust is evil and that we should not even lust after our own wives. Remarkably, nobody challenged him on it (to my regret). I thought it was the dumbest thing I had ever heard.
                    Probably because people typically don't like to bear their testimony about how much they lust after their wives. A silent majority of eyerolls are assumed to prevail and TMI is avoided.
                    Everything in life is an approximation.

                    http://twitter.com/CougarStats

                    Comment

                    • Jeff Lebowski
                      Corporate lackey for Jesus
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 69773

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Indy Coug View Post
                      Probably because people typically don't like to bear their testimony about how much they lust after their wives. A silent majority of eyerolls are assumed to prevail and TMI is avoided.
                      I really have no problem admitting that I am sexually attracted to my wife. I hope that doesn't embarrass you.
                      "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                      "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                      "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                      Comment

                      • Omaha 680
                        Senior Member
                        • Jul 2011
                        • 11189

                        #41
                        I just don't relate to a lot of this thread, although I see how these problems could arise. I was blesses with a father (who also was my bishop for a stretch) who stressed that while sexual sin was serious, sexual intimacy was something wonderful to look forward to experiencing at the proper time. I never was taught that impulses were bad, only that they should be bridled appropriately.

                        Comment

                        • Indy Coug
                          Heartless Bastard
                          • Dec 2008
                          • 18747

                          #42
                          Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
                          I really have no problem admitting that I am sexually attracted to my wife. I hope that doesn't embarrass you.
                          I figured it was either that or the cooking.
                          Everything in life is an approximation.

                          http://twitter.com/CougarStats

                          Comment

                          • Scorcho
                            Junior Member
                            • Aug 2011
                            • 835

                            #43
                            Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
                            I remember many years ago not long after we were married I was sitting in an EQ meeting and the instructor went on and on about how lust is evil and that we should not even lust after our own wives. Remarkably, nobody challenged him on it (to my regret). I thought it was the dumbest thing I had ever heard.
                            And then there is the other end of the spectrum, where someone testifies and publically reveals in church some of the details of their colorful sexual past. I don’t know which is more uncomfortable. “The holier than thou instruction” or the “wow, I didn’t need to ever know that about you approach.”

                            Either way, teaching moment fail.

                            Comment

                            • The Rambam
                              Wandering Rambam
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 394

                              #44
                              Originally posted by Katy Lied View Post
                              Rambam on his favorite strategy: take something common to a wider audience (in this case, Christendom), narrowly redefine it as a mormon phenomenon, and then bewail the fact that we are so odd, so different than others, such misfits.

                              3 Nephi 12:28 is word-for-word in the New Testament, in the Sermon on the Mount.

                              Born Again Jimmy Carter referred to this very scripture when he made his infamous confession in Playboy Magazine that he had lusted after many women in his heart. So your correlation between young LDS boys can be broadened to any young christian boy, including catholics about which this issue is widely written.

                              If you want to talk about sexual dysfunction, you don't have to do it in the context of mormonism in order to discuss it on CUF.
                              This just seems like an odd response to me. I include three cites, all to LDS sources (one of them also in the NT), on a BYU related discussion board, and you jump down my throat for not including context outside the Mormon tradition in the broader Christian world?

                              And I do think that we are very odd sexually. We actually take the law of chastity very seriously, more seriously than most other faiths I think.

                              But it just seems crazy to have to defend talking about an issue in a Mormon context on a Mormon board.
                              A Mormon president could make a perfectly patriotic, competent, inspiring leader. But not Mitt Romney. He is a husked void. --David Javerbaum

                              Comment

                              • The Rambam
                                Wandering Rambam
                                • Nov 2008
                                • 394

                                #45
                                Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
                                I remember many years ago not long after we were married I was sitting in an EQ meeting and the instructor went on and on about how lust is evil and that we should not even lust after our own wives. Remarkably, nobody challenged him on it (to my regret). I thought it was the dumbest thing I had ever heard.
                                This mentality is not that uncommon in the Church.
                                A Mormon president could make a perfectly patriotic, competent, inspiring leader. But not Mitt Romney. He is a husked void. --David Javerbaum

                                Comment

                                Working...