BKP on the Priesthood Ban

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • woot
    replied
    Originally posted by creekster View Post
    We're all almost Monkeys, which is demeaning!
    Monkeys kick ass. I'm proud to be a monkey (cladistically).

    Leave a comment:


  • creekster
    replied
    Originally posted by Harry Tic View Post
    When I was a ten-year old kid I really got into the Erich von Daniken stuff. I recently watched Chariots of the Gods on Netflix for old times' sake and let me tell you, his research has held up beautifully.
    .
    I LOVED Von Daniken! I read all of his books. I don't know if it was because I was getting older and so thinking more clearly or if he was just getting worse, but with each book I became less and less impressed.

    Leave a comment:


  • creekster
    replied
    Originally posted by SoCalCoug View Post
    Ha! According to that chart, you really are almost a monkey!


    We're all almost Monkeys, which is demeaning!

    Leave a comment:


  • SoCalCoug
    replied
    Originally posted by Uncle Ted View Post
    It's the missing link: Alien DNA. Here is his video where he is talking about it:






    His book:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]3551[/ATTACH]

    http://www.amazon.com/forever-change...6977806&sr=1-1
    Yeah, I read it in a little more detail. He's a little out there.

    Believe me, I've been on lots of crackpot sites, though, and that pdf is much better done than most crackpot websites.

    Leave a comment:


  • woot
    replied
    Yikes. Never mind. I forgot that you don't even accept the basics of reality. You wouldn't care about the evolution of black skin.

    Leave a comment:


  • woot
    replied
    Originally posted by byu71 View Post
    On the descendents of Cain thing, what is offensive? Aren't we all in agreement that the sins of the parents do not fall upon the children. I would think those of the PC, enlightened group would be the first to say you would not hold it against the children for what a parent did?

    If it is indeed offensive to the enlightened folks to believe in the Cain theory, I guess I should be outraged at the enlightened crowd for claiming I am the descendent of a monkey. Personally I would rather be a descendent of Cain than monkeys.

    I am not saying the Cain theory isn't hogwash, I am just wondering if there is more to it being offensive than political correctness.
    If you're interested in the actual origin of black people I'm happy to explain the science. Meanwhile, if you appreciate silly children's stories that explain natural phenomena, there's this guy named Rudyard Kipling that you'd love! Way better than scripture, imho.

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry Tic
    replied
    Originally posted by Uncle Ted View Post
    It's the missing link: Alien DNA. Here is his video where he is talking about it:







    His book:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]3551[/ATTACH]

    http://www.amazon.com/forever-change...6977806&sr=1-1
    When I was a ten-year old kid I really got into the Erich von Daniken stuff. I recently watched Chariots of the Gods on Netflix for old times' sake and let me tell you, his research has held up beautifully.

    Of course now when I watch it, I can't help but be struck by the how similar the vibe is to Ancient America Speaks, or whatever the filmstrip was that we'd show the investigators.

    Leave a comment:


  • SCcoug
    replied
    So the cylons and colonists mixed their DNA with a common ancestor to make homo sapiens?

    Leave a comment:


  • old_gregg
    replied
    Originally posted by clackamascoug View Post
    This talk belongs in the Bigfoot thread. Which begs the question. Where was Sasquatch on that chart?
    the left wing scientific propaganda establishment doesn't want you to know about cain or his exploits.

    Leave a comment:


  • Uncle Ted
    replied
    Originally posted by USUC View Post
    Lol, WTF is this? I'm going to have to read that when I get home.
    It's the missing link: Alien DNA. Here is his video where he is talking about it:




    Originally posted by SoCalCoug View Post
    I read through a little of it. He doesn't come across as a crackpot.
    His book:

    51jD3z45mYL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA278_PIkin4,BottomRight.jpg

    http://www.amazon.com/forever-change...6977806&sr=1-1

    Leave a comment:


  • clackamascoug
    replied
    This talk belongs in the Bigfoot thread. Which begs the question. Where was Sasquatch on that chart?

    Leave a comment:


  • SoCalCoug
    replied
    Originally posted by creekster View Post
    Don't be an apeist. You're just jealous that I have my own category. At least I don't have to share it with those disgusting chimpanzees
    Ha! According to that chart, you really are almost a monkey!

    Originally posted by USUC View Post
    Lol, WTF is this? I'm going to have to read that when I get home.
    I read through a little of it. He doesn't come across as a crackpot.

    Leave a comment:


  • HuskyFreeNorthwest
    replied
    Originally posted by SoCalCoug View Post
    To be accurate, you are not descended from a monkey. You share a common ancestor with a monkey.

    Of course, if you go back far enough, you also share a common ancestor with an amoeba. So there's that.
    How can that be? Someone here said they went back to Adam.

    Leave a comment:


  • USUC
    replied
    Originally posted by Uncle Ted View Post
    Yes, that evidence comes from the correct translation of the Bible... Some "Elohim" aliens mixed their DNA with the monkeys' DNA:




    The Vatican has been holding out on us.
    Lol, WTF is this? I'm going to have to read that when I get home.

    Leave a comment:


  • Topper
    replied
    Originally posted by byu71 View Post
    Would you say that to any protected class? Nope, just some white christian guy you have no fear of offending.
    IT was probably directed at a poster on another board.

    Leave a comment:

Working...