Originally posted by TripletDaddy
View Post
Word I have never heard used in GD before yesterday.
Collapse
X
-
That is a signature quote.Originally posted by TripletDaddy View PostI'm in the Intercourse camp."Be a philosopher. A man can compromise to gain a point. It has become apparent that a man can, within limits, follow his inclinations within the arms of the Church if he does so discreetly." - The Walking Drum
"And here’s what life comes down to—not how many years you live, but how many of those years are filled with bullshit that doesn’t amount to anything to satisfy the requirements of some dickhead you’ll never get the pleasure of punching in the face." – Adam Carolla
Comment
-
I attended Sunday School for the first time in two years yesterday. I wish I was back in the primary now.
Here was a little nugget I heard for the first time:
"It's been prophesied in the scriptures that the time would come that Latter Day Saints would be the only people left that want to have have children." This was said right after our teacher told everyone that the United States was one of the last countries in the world that is adequately replacing its population with its birth rate -- not industrializes country, just any country period.Part of it is based on academic grounds. Among major conferences, the Pac-10 is the best academically, largely because of Stanford, Cal and UCLA. “Colorado is on a par with Oregon,” he said. “Utah isn’t even in the picture.”
Comment
-
Nothing to base it on, but IMHO Mary's virgin state was overrated, and probably sprang from the cult of Virgin Mary worship which placed great emphasis upon virginity in middle aged societies with primogeniture.
Sort of like how in today's LDS society, we place a premium on men being cleanly shaven, but in Brigham's day, sober men wore beards. So we depict Jesus as clean shaven now, but he's bearded in pictures 100 years ago.
I think reverence for Mary's purity would still be achieved if she were a virgin at conception. Not a virgin at birth. Then the birth of Jesus is a miracle because it was the issuing forth of the Savior of man, not some biological freakshow.
Comment
-
-
This is how I understand it.Originally posted by Katy Lied View PostI think reverence for Mary's purity would still be achieved if she were a virgin at conception. Not a virgin at birth. Then the birth of Jesus is a miracle because it was the issuing forth of the Savior of man, not some biological freakshow."You interns are like swallows. You shit all over my patients for six weeks and then fly off."
"Don't be sorry, it's not your fault. It's my fault for overestimating your competence."
Comment
-
-
who isn't really?Originally posted by TripletDaddy View PostI'm in the Intercourse camp.
[ame="http://www.hulu.com/watch/202001/saturday-night-live-snl-digital-short-i-just-had-sex"]Hulu - Saturday Night Live: SNL Digital Short: I Just Had Sex@@AMEPARAM@@http://www.hulu.com/embed/qWUKU65mXRHzBZVrWi5vQg@@AMEPARAM@@qWUKU65mXRHzBZVr Wi5vQg[/ame]Dyslexics are teople poo...
Comment
-
Isn't it more likely that the virgin claims, if not accurate, were more ancient than springing forth in the middle ages? After all, most ancient middle eastern religions had gods' born miraculously or of virgin births. At least based upon what I've read.Originally posted by Katy Lied View PostNothing to base it on, but IMHO Mary's virgin state was overrated, and probably sprang from the cult of Virgin Mary worship which placed great emphasis upon virginity in middle aged societies with primogeniture.
Comment
-
Yeah, I am aware of that, but doesn't it still leave open some wiggle room in terms of actual circumstances? Like I said, I was under the impression that the actual mechanics of the event were not settled.Originally posted by Jacob View PostOfficial doctrinal statement:
This is from:
THE FATHER AND THE SON
A Doctrinal Exposition by The First Presidency and The Twelve (1926)
There are much more explicit statements of the claim, including in recent church manuals published by the church. But nothing with doctrinal weight. Though when you combine all the statements by prophets and church publications, you get about as close as you can to doctrine.
But this is where I start to have a CardiacCoug moment and think to myself "How could anyone know that?""There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
I wish Salon or SEIC were here to answer this.Originally posted by Jacob View PostIsn't it more likely that the virgin claims, if not accurate, were more ancient than springing forth in the middle ages? After all, most ancient middle eastern religions had gods' born miraculously or of virgin births. At least based upon what I've read.
I didnt think these gods sprang forth from virgins, only that they sprang forth in a non-normal biological way; ie from a crack in the earth, from a spring in the ground, from the head of his father. Not sure.
Comment
-
Certainly its not at the level that members are required to believe it. I doubt anyone would be disciplined for teaching that it didn't happen that way, until they were told not to. I'd guess that if we ever came out with an official determination on the matter, it'd be like the resolution the 12 reached after hearing debates by HB Roberts and JF Smith regarding the existence of pre-Adamites. IOW, neither position is a doctrine of the church and both people teaching the divergent theories should refrain from speaking about it in public and stop insulting each other.Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View PostYeah, I am aware of that, but doesn't it still leave open some wiggle room in terms of actual circumstances? Like I said, I was under the impression that the actual mechanics of the event were not settled.
But this is where I start to have a CardiacCoug moment and think to myself "How could anyone know that?"
Then again, just as JF Smith became apostle and president and BH Roberts did not, I'd expect someone holding the "literal" conception theory to advance faster in the leadership.
OTOH, every statement from a church publication or high up leader leans toward the "literal" conception and still calls it a virgin birth because the mate/father/sire was not a mortal man. And the statements are not 100 years old. Also, a very large portion of the lay members believe this because they have been taught it in church. You'd think such a broadly held belief that is so strange to other Christians would have been clarified if anyone at the top thought the teaching were incorrect.
Back to what I said...neither position is doctrine, but I'd guess that most leaders and lay members believe the "literal" conception is the correct teaching.
Comment
-
[ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miraculous_births"]Miraculous births - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia@@AMEPARAM@@/wiki/File:Abraham_renvoyant_Agar.jpg" class="image"><img alt="" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b4/Abraham_renvoyant_Agar.jpg/200px-Abraham_renvoyant_Agar.jpg"@@AMEPARAM@@commons/thumb/b/b4/Abraham_renvoyant_Agar.jpg/200px-Abraham_renvoyant_Agar.jpg[/ame]Originally posted by Katy Lied View PostI wish Salon or SEIC were here to answer this.
I didnt think these gods sprang forth from virgins, only that they sprang forth in a non-normal biological way; ie from a crack in the earth, from a spring in the ground, from the head of his father. Not sure.
It seems that some were virgin births and some were other types of miraculous births. But, perhaps the virgin birth myths were not as common as I implied earlier, though not at all exclusive to Christianity.
Comment
-
"We should remember that one man is much the same as another, and that he is best who is trained in the severest school."
-Thucydides
"Study strategy over the years and achieve the spirit of the warrior. Today is victory over yourself of yesterday; tomorrow is your victory over lesser men."-Miyamoto Musashi
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Comment
-
Comment