Originally posted by Viking
View Post
The Next Mormon Schism
Collapse
X
-
This GC may have been the roll out, although there are reasons to think otherwise:
Last edited by Sleeping in EQ; 10-05-2010, 09:06 AM.We all trust our own unorthodoxies.
-
General Conference was a disaster? A disaster?Originally posted by Sleeping in EQ View PostI'm not blaming BYU football and I always take responsibility for my faith. I'm just lamenting the lack of joy on Friday night, followed by the disaster that was GC.

Is the object going into General Conference to have your rabbit ears up searching for as much as possible to get bent out of shape about?
Don't bother answering that question. This forum is answer enough.
Comment
-
Maybe it's the morsel of poop in the brownies metaphor. You hear one talk that rubs you wrong and it spoils all 5 sessions.Originally posted by Indy Coug View PostGeneral Conference was a disaster? A disaster?
"Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf
Comment
-
I didn't watch much of conference, we took the opportunity to get out of town and see a football game with some friends. I did catch a good portion of Sunday morning session, but I missed Packer's talk. After having seen snippets online, I don't think I'll read it, not worth the effort.Originally posted by Indy Coug View PostGeneral Conference was a disaster? A disaster?

Is the object going into General Conference to have your rabbit ears up searching for as much as possible to get bent out of shape about?
Don't bother answering that question. This forum is answer enough.
Indy, I think you're completely misunderstanding people here. Here's the best analogy I can think of at the moment. Let's say that membership in the church is like climbing a tree. Sometimes you're able to find a good path on a strong branch where you're able to get your feet under you and balance well enough to move on and explore other areas of the tree. Other times, you're just hanging on, hoping that you can find a more secure hand hold and then someone comes along and instead of offering you a hand they take a club and beat your hands with it, which, because of the pain, causes you to either let go completely, hoping that you'll find that solid branch beneath you, or that the fall doesn't hurt badly enough to prevent you from climbing the tree again.
I'll ask you a question that begins with a couple of postulations. If, on a broad scale, the purpose of the church is to bring people to Christ, and if the purpose of GC is the same, then how, if at all, does a talk condemning homosexuality (and in turn those who vote to legalize same sex marriage) further that purpose? Why beat the hands of those who are just trying to hang on?Dio perdona tante cose per un’opera di misericordia
God forgives many things for an act of mercyAlessandro Manzoni
Knock it off. This board has enough problems without a dose of middle-age lechery.
pelagius
Comment
-
The answer to your question is "no."Originally posted by Indy Coug View PostGeneral Conference was a disaster? A disaster?

Is the object going into General Conference to have your rabbit ears up searching for as much as possible to get bent out of shape about?
Don't bother answering that question. This forum is answer enough.
Thank you for your kind consideration.We all trust our own unorthodoxies.
Comment
-
Part of bringing people to Christ entails clearly delineating what is and isn't acceptable behavior.Originally posted by pellegrino View PostIf, on a broad scale, the purpose of the church is to bring people to Christ, and if the purpose of GC is the same, then how, if at all, does a talk condemning homosexuality (and in turn those who vote to legalize same sex marriage) further that purpose?
Comment
-
I agree with this. There are ways of doing this that seem Christlike and there are ways of doing this that remind me of the Witchhunts (a little over the top but I couldn't think of another comparison without taking too much time).Originally posted by Indy Coug View PostPart of bringing people to Christ entails clearly delineating what is and isn't acceptable behavior.
I have made it quite clear on this board I am not for gay marriage. That being said, I found Elder Pakards talk taking me back into another time. A time when we had reasons why blacks couldn't hold the priesthood (fence sitters), a time when we loved the Lamanites (so much so we told them if they were good enough some day they could be white), a time when we told the Catholics they belonged to the great and abomnible (sp) church and a time when we told those who used birth control they would reap the wrath of God.
While most of the brethern have moved on, I don't think Elder Packard has.
Comment
-
Agreed, so what did Christ have to say about homosexuality? Feel free to cite your scriptural references in the standard form (i.e. chapter and verse).Originally posted by Indy Coug View PostPart of bringing people to Christ entails clearly delineating what is and isn't acceptable behavior.Dio perdona tante cose per un’opera di misericordia
God forgives many things for an act of mercyAlessandro Manzoni
Knock it off. This board has enough problems without a dose of middle-age lechery.
pelagius
Comment
-
So you intend to completely dismiss modern revelation? Shocker.Originally posted by pellegrino View PostAgreed, so what did Christ have to say about homosexuality? Feel free to cite your scriptural references in the standard form (i.e. chapter and verse).
Comment
-
-
Hardly. Undoubtedly, it was the end result of intensive market research and focus groups.Originally posted by Flystripper View PostThe Proclamation was modern revelation?
Comment
-
Ha!Originally posted by Indy Coug View PostHardly. Undoubtedly, it was the end result of intensive market research and focus groups.
But seriously, when The Proclamation came out I never thought of it as something new or something revealed. It didn't seem like revelation to me. Sure it came from the First Presidency and they "solemnly declared" but was it modern revelation? It didn't seem that way to me at the time (this was a time when I was active) but what do I know? I am a hopeless apostate.Dyslexics are teople poo...
Comment
-
My wife the pharmacist was very glad to hear Elder Ballard's addiction talk (recorded - since she was working on Saturday and Sunday!). She sees all kinds of addiction problems here in Utah to a degree that's not even been approximated in other places she's worked. WAY MORE people taking WAY MORE painkillers in northern Utah County.Originally posted by UtahDan View PostI thought the addiction talk was very positive. It also doesn't hurt to remind yourself that it is your church too.
Comment
-
-
The common thread is that they didn't pray over any of these decisions and wait for that pesky spiritual confirmation.Originally posted by Sleeping in EQ View PostSo the process was the same as for the mall? Got it.
Comment
Comment