Originally posted by jay santos
View Post
I take issue with the ways in which the church seeks to control information about its origins and history. I take issue with the ways in which they distort historical documents to prove a predetermined conclusion, even when the evidence doesn't support that conclusion, or at the very least it doesn't exclude all other possible conclusions, as they would have you believe.
NWU's example of Noah in the seminary manual is a prime example. I think we should look at the "Teachings of [insert prophet's name here]" series in this light as well. I'm not proposing a viable remedy, as we've gone so far down the correlation path that it literally has become the sole mean of discourse within the church. It permeates and defines the very being of the church today. You don't just move away from that quickly and easily.
Comment