I bet if the Church HQ were in Houston they'd quickly change the rule about yard work. Words cannot do justice to the hellish feeling of gutting houses in NOLA wearing garments AND clothes on top of them.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
LDS Garments: Why I Want Out of This Club
Collapse
X
-
this is nothing we didn't already know.Originally posted by Northwestcoug View PostI hate to lower the boom on everyone else in this thread, but here's the rest of the CHOI section on garments:
"Endowed members should wear the temple garment both day and night. They should not remove it, either entirely or partially, to work in the yard or for other activities that can reasonably be done with the garment worn properly beneath the clothing. Nor should they remove it to lounge around the home in swimwear or immodest clothing. When they must remove the garment, such as for swimming, they should put it back on as soon as possible.
Members should not adjust the garment or wear it contrary to instructions in order to accommodate different styles of clothing. Nor should they alter the garment from its authorized design. When two-piece garments are used, both pieces should always be worn.
The garment is sacred and should be treated with respect at all times. Garments should be kept off the floor. They should also be kept clean and mended. After garments are washed, they should not be hung in public areas to dry. Nor should they be displayed or exposed to the view of people who do not understand their significance."
No cultish behavior to see here. Move along...Dio perdona tante cose per un’opera di misericordia
God forgives many things for an act of mercyAlessandro Manzoni
Knock it off. This board has enough problems without a dose of middle-age lechery.
pelagius
Comment
-
Nothing new there. But isn't it just a bit creepy when the stake presidency quizzes your wife on when and where and how she is wearing her underwear? This seems to be the new most important part of the TR interview. A very strange focus. In fact, last time we renewed, it was the only question my wife was asked by the councilor in the SP, whom she didn't even know. And it seems that bishops are now required to read a statement every time, similar to the language you posted.Originally posted by Northwestcoug View PostI hate to lower the boom on everyone else in this thread, but here's the rest of the CHOI section on garments:
Comment
-
There's nothing in there about making you own garmentsOriginally posted by Northwestcoug View PostI hate to lower the boom on everyone else in this thread, but here's the rest of the CHOI section on garments:
"Endowed members should wear the temple garment both day and night. They should not remove it, either entirely or partially, to work in the yard or for other activities that can reasonably be done with the garment worn properly beneath the clothing. Nor should they remove it to lounge around the home in swimwear or immodest clothing. When they must remove the garment, such as for swimming, they should put it back on as soon as possible.
Members should not adjust the garment or wear it contrary to instructions in order to accommodate different styles of clothing. Nor should they alter the garment from its authorized design. When two-piece garments are used, both pieces should always be worn.
The garment is sacred and should be treated with respect at all times. Garments should be kept off the floor. They should also be kept clean and mended. After garments are washed, they should not be hung in public areas to dry. Nor should they be displayed or exposed to the view of people who do not understand their significance."
No cultish behavior to see here. Move along...
"Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf
Comment
-
Was she really questioned regarding particulars? Or was she just asked the standard "Do you wear the garment as instructed"? That doesn't seem like anything to get upset, or even mildly annoyed, about.Originally posted by Jacob View PostNothing new there. But isn't it just a bit creepy when the stake presidency quizzes your wife on when and where and how she is wearing her underwear? This seems to be the new most important part of the TR interview. A very strange focus. In fact, last time we renewed, it was the only question my wife was asked by the councilor in the SP, whom she didn't even know. And it seems that bishops are now required to read a statement every time, similar to the language you posted.Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.
Dig your own grave, and save!
"The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American
"I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Moliere View PostThere's nothing in there about making you own garments

Sadly, I found that the garments I made myself were not much better than the ones the Church sells, and they were more expensive.Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.
Dig your own grave, and save!
"The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American
"I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
My boom-lowering was tongue-in-cheek, as I assumed everyone knew the church-policy on garments.
I was just struck by how reasonable-sounding the discussion of this thread was, and how much it differed from the handbook statement. I've always defended the church from people who called it a cult. But to be honest, after reading the garment section, I concede their point somewhat."...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
Comment
-
I've encouraged my wife to get explicit in an effort to dissaude anyone from asking such intrusive and ridiculous quesitons.Originally posted by Jacob View PostNothing new there. But isn't it just a bit creepy when the stake presidency quizzes your wife on when and where and how she is wearing her underwear? This seems to be the new most important part of the TR interview. A very strange focus. In fact, last time we renewed, it was the only question my wife was asked by the councilor in the SP, whom she didn't even know. And it seems that bishops are now required to read a statement every time, similar to the language you posted.
"So, yeah...sometimes when we go out, I wear cheekies from Victorias Secret. My husband removes them as he... Once we are both satisfied, I replace the garment."
If the SP member says, "Hey, that's more than I need to know...", she can reply, "Well, you were the one that asked about when, where, how and why I removed my underwear..."
Today is one of those days when I'm feeling rather suffocated by the culture.
The disadvantage of the two year temple recommend is that it only affords you the opportunity to give awkward yet acceptable answers to intrusive questions every other year.
Comment
-
This boom-lowering, however, is VERY serious.Originally posted by Moliere View PostThere's nothing in there about making you own garments
Members may make their own temple aprons only if they use the approved apron embroidery and sewing kit that is available through Church Distribution Services. Other temple ceremonial clothing may not be made. Nor may temple garments be made."...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
Comment
-
Bah. What's changed so much in the last 50 years that suddenly we cannot be trusted to sew little symbols into a white t-shirt?Originally posted by Northwestcoug View PostThis boom-lowering, however, is VERY serious.
Members may make their own temple aprons only if they use the approved apron embroidery and sewing kit that is available through Church Distribution Services. Other temple ceremonial clothing may not be made. Nor may temple garments be made.
(this isn't directed at you, per se, NWC)Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.
Dig your own grave, and save!
"The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American
"I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
You assume that some of us care what the CHOI says. Well, not necessarily you, but you get my point. I've already stated I think we have it wrong.Originally posted by Northwestcoug View PostThis boom-lowering, however, is VERY serious.
Members may make their own temple aprons only if they use the approved apron embroidery and sewing kit that is available through Church Distribution Services. Other temple ceremonial clothing may not be made. Nor may temple garments be made.
What happens in my next interview when I say what I just said here? What will they do to me? The same thing they did when I said I didn't keep the WoW because I eat too much meat?Awesomeness now has a name. Let me introduce myself.
Comment
-
Originally posted by falafel View PostBah. What's changed so much in the last 50 years that suddenly we cannot be trusted to sew little symbols into a white t-shirt?
(this isn't directed at you, per se, NWC)Originally posted by nikuman View PostYou assume that some of us care what the CHOI says. Well, not necessarily you, but you get my point. I've already stated I think we have it wrong.
What happens in my next interview when I say what I just said here? What will they do to me? The same thing they did when I said I didn't keep the WoW because I eat too much meat?
"...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
Comment
-
"Now Brother niku, you know what I meant..."Originally posted by nikuman View Post
What happens in my next interview when I say what I just said here? What will they do to me? The same thing they did when I said I didn't keep the WoW because I eat too much meat?
How long until you get to 'Ve vill nacht tolerate zis inzubordination!'?
Comment
-
As soon as they call me Brother my insubordination level will jump up a notch.Originally posted by NorthwestUteFan View Post"Now Brother niku, you know what I meant..."
How long until you get to 'Ve vill nacht tolerate zis inzubordination!'?Awesomeness now has a name. Let me introduce myself.
Comment
Comment