During the course of the standard lecture on pornography, masturbation (he even recommended that crazy pamphlet on the "factory), and sex Sunday, our Bishop sidetracked into a surpisingly interesting arena. He pointed out that there are many who use manipulation to encourage sex out of women, especially young women. He then counseled the ward members to help their daughters to be resistant to manipulation.
One brave soul raised his hand and pointed out that susceptibility to manipulation is a learned response. He then pointed out that, especially in a religious context, manipulation is common currency. His point was finally made that if we wanted to do what the Bishop recommended, we needed to stop manipulating our kids toward things that we thought were good because doing so made them susceptible to manipulation toward things that we thought were bad.
Bishop (a known manipulator) was stunned. Audience was stunned. K-dog was reading cougarboard and actually put it down to hear the exciting response but no excitement was forthcoming topic was ignored and Bishop returned to advice regarding computers in the family room etc.
My question, is this gentleman's point valid? Is there a concern that manipulation makes one susceptible to manipulation and does this have value in a discussion of raising children, especially in a religious tradition (let's assume for argument that all religion uses manipulation to control their adherents.)
One brave soul raised his hand and pointed out that susceptibility to manipulation is a learned response. He then pointed out that, especially in a religious context, manipulation is common currency. His point was finally made that if we wanted to do what the Bishop recommended, we needed to stop manipulating our kids toward things that we thought were good because doing so made them susceptible to manipulation toward things that we thought were bad.
Bishop (a known manipulator) was stunned. Audience was stunned. K-dog was reading cougarboard and actually put it down to hear the exciting response but no excitement was forthcoming topic was ignored and Bishop returned to advice regarding computers in the family room etc.
My question, is this gentleman's point valid? Is there a concern that manipulation makes one susceptible to manipulation and does this have value in a discussion of raising children, especially in a religious tradition (let's assume for argument that all religion uses manipulation to control their adherents.)
But I know it's a good thing, even though as a parent it makes life harder.
Comment