What is more damaging?

[byu71]

to people inside the church and even those outside of the church.

Men who sneak looks at Playboy, SI swimsuit and other comparable stuff or men in the church who pull off massive financial scams.

Anyone have a theory why we don't hear more about the sacred duty of being honest in dealing with our fellow men. Seems porn gets more attention.

Maybe it is because we need to protect our youth and our youth aren't in a position to rip people off.

[Donuthole]

No, is is more damaging!

[mUUser]

I once noticed an Amish man sneaking a peek at SI Swimsuit edition in Costco. He didn't seem bothered by it. Neither was I. The Amish are more misunderstood than LDS.

[TripletDaddy]

Was, not was.

[byu71]

No, is is more damaging!

I don't know how to fix it. I thought it would be a good subject and now all that will happen is I will be mocked and ridiculed.

I honestly know the difference between the words "what" and "was". I could have also used "which"

[Indy Coug]

to people inside the church and even those outside of the church.

Men who sneak looks at Playboy, SI swimsuit and other comparable stuff or men in the church who pull off massive financial scams.

Anyone have a theory why we don't hear more about the sacred duty of being honest in dealing with our fellow men. Seems porn gets more attention.

Maybe it is because we need to protect our youth and our youth aren't in a position to rip people off.

Why is this an either/or proposition?

[creekster]

I don't know how to fix it. I thought it would be a good subject and now all that will happen is I will be mocked and ridiculed.

I honestly know the difference between the words "what" and "was". I could have also used "which"

FIxed.

[byu71]

Why is this an either/or proposition?

Good question. If they are both problems, why would one of the problems get more air time.

[Donuthole]

FIxed.

That's some sweet irony, there.

[RobinFinderson]

to people inside the church and even those outside of the church.

Men who sneak looks at Playboy, SI swimsuit and other comparable stuff or men in the church who pull off massive financial scams.

Anyone have a theory why we don't hear more about the sacred duty of being honest in dealing with our fellow men. Seems porn gets more attention.

Maybe it is because we need to protect our youth and our youth aren't in a position to rip people off.

I vote for financial scams, since looking at porn isn't damaging to people whose religion doesn't forbid it.

[creekster]

That's some sweet irony, there.

Thank you.

[Donuthole]

I vote for financial scams, since looking at porn isn't damaging to people whose religion doesn't forbid it.

Well financial scams aren't damaging to the people who get away with them.

[byu71]

FIxed.

Thanks and to the "mockers".:moon:

[smokymountainrain]

to people inside the church and even those outside of the church.

Men who sneak looks at Playboy, SI swimsuit and other comparable stuff or men in the church who pull off massive financial scams.

Anyone have a theory why we don't hear more about the sacred duty of being honest in dealing with our fellow men. Seems porn gets more attention.

Maybe it is because we need to protect our youth and our youth aren't in a position to rip people off.

Perhaps porn is more common than guys pulling off massive financial scams.

[creekster]

Perhaps porn is more common than guys pulling off massive financial scams.

ANd is more likely to affect the family realtionship dynamic across a broader spectrum than the showy but less common scam.

Neither shoudl eb encouraged or ignored, however.