Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Women never say the prayers in General Conference?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Indy Coug View Post
    That's a complete misrepresentation of my "argument".

    The point I'm making is that scottie will endeavor to frame any issue in such a way to take a shot at a shortcoming of the church. And if perchance someone was to provide evidence to the contrary about the GC Prayer Manifesto, this would simply be used in turn by scottie to spawn some new gripe because he's going to keep moving that target.
    Despite what you think, that's not my style; I think I'm very mellow in my LDS Church gripes.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by scottie View Post
      Despite what you think, that's not my style; I think I'm very mellow in my LDS Church gripes.
      I agree. Scottie's effectiveness in airing any gripes lies in an understated socratic approach (hey, I'm just askin'). His thread starters are masterful; he's the Randy Johnson of thread starters. That's what pisses Indy off. Scottie wins; Indy loses.
      When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.

      --Jonathan Swift

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post


        Indy's expletive was more offensive than scottie's, especially since it came in a thread about LDS oppression of women:



        Why were you only offended by scottie's?
        verb vs noun.

        it was a comparison. I didnt say offended, I said annoyed and I said more annoyed. Why are you in such a hurry to stir things up like this? Rather than deal with the issue you revel in trying to create drama where none need exist. Sometimes this works well, but someitmes you shoudl give it a rest.

        I take it your imaginings havent borne much fruit?
        PLesa excuse the tpyos.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Indy Coug View Post
          That's a complete misrepresentation of my "argument".

          The point I'm making is that scottie will endeavor to frame any issue in such a way to take a shot at a shortcoming of the church. And if perchance someone was to provide evidence to the contrary about the GC Prayer Manifesto, this would simply be used in turn by scottie to spawn some new gripe because he's going to keep moving that target.
          I can't believe that you're the one complaining about Scottie being predictable. Anyone who has been on this board more than a week could have scripted your response to Scottie.
          "The mind is not a boomerang. If you throw it too far it will not come back." ~ Tom McGuane

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by scottie View Post
            Despite what you think, that's not my style; I think I'm very mellow in my LDS Church gripes.
            Your approach to the LDS Church is similar to Chinese Water Torture. As mellow as a drop of water but very doggedly consistent. This is not a call for you to change so take no offense and I wish you luck in you goal to make sense of it all. I had an aunt from Carrey who was quite a tomboy, her daughter was a tomboy but her sons ended up batting for the Utes...is it the water or all that crap coming from the center of the Universe from all those Hollywood elite out of the People's Republic of Blaine County?
            Do Your Damnedest In An Ostentatious Manner All The Time!
            -General George S. Patton

            I'm choosing to mostly ignore your fatuity here and instead overwhelm you with so much data that you'll maybe, just maybe, realize that you have reams to read on this subject before you can contribute meaningfully to any conversation on this topic.
            -DOCTOR Wuap

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by creekster View Post
              verb vs noun.

              it was a comparison. I didnt say offended, I said annoyed and I said more annoyed. Why are you in such a hurry to stir things up like this? Rather than deal with the issue you revel in trying to create drama where none need exist. Sometimes this works well, but someitmes you shoudl give it a rest.

              I take it your imaginings havent borne much fruit?
              No, it's Indy who started this rather than address the merits. He attacked scottie personally rather than address the merits.
              When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.

              --Jonathan Swift

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Non Sequitur View Post
                I can't believe that you're the one complaining about Scottie being predictable. Anyone who has been on this board more than a week could have scripted your response to Scottie.
                scottie's predictability is not what I'm complaining about.
                Everything in life is an approximation.

                http://twitter.com/CougarStats

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Non Sequitur View Post
                  I can't believe that you're the one complaining about Scottie being predictable. Anyone who has been on this board more than a week could have scripted your response to Scottie.
                  I am offended by two types of people...People who are predictable and people who pooh-pooh the fine art of augmentation surgery!
                  Do Your Damnedest In An Ostentatious Manner All The Time!
                  -General George S. Patton

                  I'm choosing to mostly ignore your fatuity here and instead overwhelm you with so much data that you'll maybe, just maybe, realize that you have reams to read on this subject before you can contribute meaningfully to any conversation on this topic.
                  -DOCTOR Wuap

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
                    No, it's Indy who started this rather than address the merits. He attacked scottie personally rather than address the merits.
                    What constitutes a personal attack? I certainly have taken issue with his posting content, but I don't believe I have actually called him names.
                    Everything in life is an approximation.

                    http://twitter.com/CougarStats

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Is it just me, or has this board seen this thread in some form about a billion times.

                      Someone complaining about some really small detail of the LDS church (in this case Scottie).

                      Indycoug responding in a 'you have got to be kidding' manner.

                      Seattleute piling on like a ravenous wolf.

                      BYU71 somehow tying it in to being a 'true' fan and scheduling weak opponents.

                      Tripletdaddy defending free speech on the board and being yet again dissapointed in this new revelation. Yet, still his great testimony will get him through.

                      Goatnappers obligatory response concerning boobs.

                      Is this what hell will be like, a neverending argument which has to be carried out even though we know everyones stance already?

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        I thought that I remembered women praying in GC, but rather that participating in the pointless back and forth that you all are engaged in, I went out and got some cold, hard facts.

                        The Ensign (preferred pronunciation: N’sign, not N’sun), looks like it started listing the prayers in 2002. They skipped the September 2007 sessions, but aside from that, I looked at every session and did not see any women in the general sessions. While this obviously doesn't prove anything, it does represent over 100 prayers, so I think it is good evidence.

                        I was initially excited because in the April 2009 Priesthood session, Shirley Christensen said the benediction. Unfortunately, it turns out Shirley is a man. He also prayed in the Sunday Morning session in April, 2005, so evidently someone likes his prayers.

                        Also of interest, in the 2 or so years before being called to the Q of the 12, Elders Cook, Christofferson, and Andersen ALL said a prayer in a session of conference. Liberal Mormons will be happy to note that Marlin Jensen said the invocation Sunday Morning in October. So I think that there is a good chance that we will have another Democrat Apostle in the near future. Or possibly an Apostle named Shirley.

                        Hope this helps.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Tone Loc View Post
                          Someone complaining about some really small detail of the LDS church (in this case Scottie).

                          Indycoug responding in a 'you have got to be kidding' manner.

                          Seattleute piling on like a ravenous wolf.

                          BYU71 somehow tying it in to being a 'true' fan and scheduling weak opponents.

                          Tripletdaddy defending free speech on the board and being yet again dissapointed in this new revelation. Yet, still his great testimony will get him through.

                          Goatnappers obligatory response concerning boobs.

                          Is this what hell will be like, a neverending argument which has to be carried out even though we know everyones stance already?
                          You seem to be an expert on this board for a four post child. I don't trust you.
                          When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.

                          --Jonathan Swift

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
                            No, it's Indy who started this rather than address the merits. He attacked scottie personally rather than address the merits.
                            Look, you know exactly what I am talking abotu and your reposne here is just you doing more of the same.
                            PLesa excuse the tpyos.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Clark Addison View Post
                              I thought that I remembered women praying in GC, but rather that participating in the pointless back and forth that you all are engaged in, I went out and got some cold, hard facts.

                              The Ensign (preferred pronunciation: N’sign, not N’sun), looks like it started listing the prayers in 2002. They skipped the September 2007 sessions, but aside from that, I looked at every session and did not see any women in the general sessions. While this obviously doesn't prove anything, it does represent over 100 prayers, so I think it is good evidence.

                              I was initially excited because in the April 2009 Priesthood session, Shirley Christensen said the benediction. Unfortunately, it turns out Shirley is a man. He also prayed in the Sunday Morning session in April, 2005, so evidently someone likes his prayers.

                              Also of interest, in the 2 or so years before being called to the Q of the 12, Elders Cook, Christofferson, and Andersen ALL said a prayer in a session of conference. Liberal Mormons will be happy to note that Marlin Jensen said the invocation Sunday Morning in October. So I think that there is a good chance that we will have another Democrat Apostle in the near future. Or possibly an Apostle named Shirley.

                              Hope this helps.
                              Facts? You think we want facts?
                              PLesa excuse the tpyos.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Scottie definitely has some sort of powerful thread starting juju. In the time I crafted my response to this, over 20 people responded. Who knew that praying women would strike such a nerve.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X