Mormon testifies against prop 8, refuses to stop, mic is cut.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SoonerCoug
    Joycelyn Elders Supporter
    • Nov 2008
    • 4680

    #61
    Here is a more complete version:

    [YOUTUBE]qqOlddmqpB8[/YOUTUBE]
    That which may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. -C. Hitchens

    http://twitter.com/SoonerCoug

    Comment

    • SoonerCoug
      Joycelyn Elders Supporter
      • Nov 2008
      • 4680

      #62
      Originally posted by RockyBalboa View Post
      There are many venues and places where as American citizens we are given the right and platform to protest and speak out against policy we find disagreeable. INSIDE a place of worship is not one of these places.
      If he had posted his complaints on the Church doors for all to see, would that have been acceptable?
      That which may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. -C. Hitchens

      http://twitter.com/SoonerCoug

      Comment

      • RockyBalboa
        Banned
        • Nov 2008
        • 2127

        #63
        Originally posted by SoonerCoug View Post
        If he had posted his complaints on the Church doors for all to see, would that have been acceptable?
        There are a lot of forums for an individual such as him or yourself to express opinions.

        Some of them are appropriate...some of them are not. Churchs have their own policies, rules and doctrines that are SEPARATE from State. In some countries had he done this he would've literally been shouted down. Cutting off his microphone was the appropriate response to expressing what he was in an in-appropriate venue.

        My biggest point is it's inappropriate to do what he did in a PLACE OF WORSHIP. This is not a difficult concept to grasp.


        He got his way. He got the attention he wants.

        Comment

        • SoonerCoug
          Joycelyn Elders Supporter
          • Nov 2008
          • 4680

          #64
          Originally posted by RockyBalboa View Post
          There are a lot of forums for an individual such as him or yourself to express opinions.

          Some of them are appropriate...some of them are not. Churchs have their own policies, rules and doctrines that are SEPARATE from State. In some countries had he done this he would've literally been shouted down. Cutting off his microphone was the appropriate response to expressing what he was in an appropriate venue.

          He got his way. He got the attention he wants.
          You didn't answer my question. If he had posted his complaints on the Church doors for everyone to read, would that have been acceptable?
          That which may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. -C. Hitchens

          http://twitter.com/SoonerCoug

          Comment

          • RockyBalboa
            Banned
            • Nov 2008
            • 2127

            #65
            Originally posted by SoonerCoug View Post
            You didn't answer my question. If he had posted his complaints on the Church doors for everyone to read, would that have been acceptable?
            I thought the answer was implied by my last response, but to make it more clear: Of course not.

            Comment

            • Surfah
              Where's Wallace?
              • Nov 2008
              • 33726

              #66
              Originally posted by SoonerCoug View Post
              You didn't answer my question. If he had posted his complaints on the Church doors for everyone to read, would that have been acceptable?
              I don't understand what this has to do with anything.
              "Nobody listens to Turtle."
              -Turtle
              sigpic

              Comment

              • RockyBalboa
                Banned
                • Nov 2008
                • 2127

                #67
                Originally posted by Surfah View Post
                I don't understand what this has to do with anything.
                While SU is the master of trolling on here...Sooner is the master of combining a quasi-serious question/troll into one question or comment. I give him a lot of credit for that.

                Comment

                • SoonerCoug
                  Joycelyn Elders Supporter
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 4680

                  #68
                  Originally posted by RockyBalboa View Post
                  I thought the answer was implied by my last response, but to make it more clear: Of course not.
                  So you think Martin Luther acted inappropriately, despite the fact that he is routinely celebrated by LDS Church leaders as an inspired predecessor to Joseph Smith.

                  I think the question of how, when, and where to effect change is a very important question. I would contend that at some point, the complaints must be public and come from within the institution itself. My immediate response to this fellow is that his choice of venue was tasteless. And while this guy is no Martin Luther, I'm sure that in his day many people thought Luther's public defiance of the Church was also inappropriate.

                  Last edited by SoonerCoug; 10-09-2009, 10:07 PM.
                  That which may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. -C. Hitchens

                  http://twitter.com/SoonerCoug

                  Comment

                  • Jeff Lebowski
                    Corporate lackey for Jesus
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 69809

                    #69
                    I hope no history teachers read this thread.
                    "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                    "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                    "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                    Comment

                    • SoonerCoug
                      Joycelyn Elders Supporter
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 4680

                      #70
                      Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
                      I hope no history teachers read this thread.
                      Why? Because it's controversial whether Luther really posted the complaints on the door?

                      I've read that this type of behavior really occurred in Luther's day, so I think my point is still valid.
                      That which may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. -C. Hitchens

                      http://twitter.com/SoonerCoug

                      Comment

                      • RockyBalboa
                        Banned
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 2127

                        #71
                        Originally posted by SoonerCoug View Post
                        So you think Martin Luther acted inappropriately, despite the fact that he is routinely celebrated by LDS Church leaders as an inspired predecessor to Joseph Smith.

                        I think the question of how, when, and where to effect change is a very important question. I would contend that at some point, the complaints must be public and come from within the institution itself. My immediate response to this fellow is that his choice of venue was tasteless. And while this guy is no Martin Luther, I'm sure that in his day many people thought Luther's public defiance of the Church was also inappropriate.
                        Regardless of your contentions....it's still inappropriate and while your'e right that he is no Martin Luther, your comparing this bozo with pre-determined and planned attention grabbing techniques means this thread has now officially jumped the shark with that kind of extremism.

                        Comment

                        • Jeff Lebowski
                          Corporate lackey for Jesus
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 69809

                          #72
                          Originally posted by SoonerCoug View Post
                          Why? Because it's controversial whether Luther really posted the complaints on the door?

                          I've read that this type of behavior really occurred in Luther's day, so I think my point is still valid.
                          No. Because it seemed that no one was catching your Martin Luther reference.
                          "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                          "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                          "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                          Comment

                          • Maximus
                            Senior Member
                            • Sep 2009
                            • 6040

                            #73
                            Originally posted by RobinFinderson View Post
                            But this WAS his testimony. He felt spiritually prompted to say what he did. He claims that he has never felt such a strong spiritual prompting. He felt compelled by the Holy Ghost to share his testimony.

                            This is what I don't understand about your position, Jeff. Are you saying that some testimonies don't belong in testimony meeting? Are you saying that you don't believe him when he says that he felt prompted by the spirit to share what he shared?
                            And you know this, how?

                            Comment

                            • SoonerCoug
                              Joycelyn Elders Supporter
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 4680

                              #74
                              Like I said, if I were bishop, I would have been very tempted to pull the plug, but only because I wouldn't have wanted to deal with the backlash from the congregation. I'm impressed this bishop lasted as long as he did.
                              That which may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. -C. Hitchens

                              http://twitter.com/SoonerCoug

                              Comment

                              • RobinFinderson
                                Banned
                                • Nov 2008
                                • 10548

                                #75
                                Originally posted by Maximus View Post
                                And you know this, how?
                                I know what? That this is his testimony, born of the spirit? Watch the video again. He states as much.

                                Comment

                                Working...