Originally posted by Surfah
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
I don't really know how to introduce this
Collapse
X
-
I am sure this little dust-up with the bookstore resulted in a bunch of new sales for him."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
-
I'm serious that it's so bad, Colbert would put it up over his mantle on setOriginally posted by Moliere View PostI'll admit I'm having a little bit of fun with it, but it is a horrible painting. Could I paint it? No, but that doesn't make it decent.
My vitrol is at the black/white nature of the people in the painting. It stinks of correlated hogwash. Plus, he put all the non-whites in the back, which speaks volumes.
Comment
-
Vonnegut once wrote a book trying to draw the distinction between art and illustration. This guy is an illustrator, not an artist, IMO. They are not the same thing.Originally posted by woot View PostThe well-deserved vitriol this guy is receiving is only partially because his views are right-fringe. I imagine that if he had painted a completely neutral scene of a bunch of people you've never heard of doing nothing of interest but mostly just lining up for the camera and then providing ham-fisted explanations of who among them is good or evil and why, it would be equally worthless as a piece of art. None of us would know about it, of course.
The fact that his art is shit isn't based on his wrong-headed beliefs; it merely makes it more funny.
And yeah, Tooblue has a point that the guy seems to be really good at painting historical figures doing nothing of interest. I just don't think that's the mark of a good artist. I bet he'd make a decent living doing portraiture.PLesa excuse the tpyos.
Comment
-
Originally posted by creekster View PostVonnegut once wrote a book trying to draw the distinction between art and illustration. This guy is an illustrator, not an artist, IMO. They are not the same thing.
Absolutely correct."The first thing I learned upon becoming a head coach after fifteen years as an assistant was the enormous difference between making a suggestion and making a decision."
"They talk about the economy this year. Hey, my hairline is in recession, my waistline is in inflation. Altogether, I'm in a depression."
"I like to bike. I could beat Lance Armstrong, only because he couldn't pass me if he was behind me."
-Rick Majerus
Comment
-
The way that i would differentate the two is that an illustrator draws the artwork for the Campbell's soup ad in the newspaper. An artist does "Starry Night" or "Mona Lisa". Having good sketching skills does not make one an artist.Originally posted by creekster View PostVonnegut once wrote a book trying to draw the distinction between art and illustration. This guy is an illustrator, not an artist, IMO. They are not the same thing."The first thing I learned upon becoming a head coach after fifteen years as an assistant was the enormous difference between making a suggestion and making a decision."
"They talk about the economy this year. Hey, my hairline is in recession, my waistline is in inflation. Altogether, I'm in a depression."
"I like to bike. I could beat Lance Armstrong, only because he couldn't pass me if he was behind me."
-Rick Majerus
Comment
-
I say, I say, Foghorn Leghorn rules!Originally posted by il Padrino Ute View PostNot really. I don't really like the painting, but is all the vitriol really deserved just because folks here don't like what the artist is expressing?
Of course, I'm not a sophisticated art patron, unless wanting a painting of Foghorn Leghorn hanging on the wall in my den meets that criteria.
Comment
-
They are both art to varying degrees. But, if we are to adhere to your premise as borrowed from a wayward Vonnegut, Robert Batemen is an illustrator and McNaughton is an artist principally because the first strives to recreate the beautiful through the application of remarkable painting techniques while the other strives to make a statement in a medium that happens to be painting, relying upon time honored painting techniques.Originally posted by creekster View PostVonnegut once wrote a book trying to draw the distinction between art and illustration. This guy is an illustrator, not an artist, IMO. They are not the same thing.
As far as his craftsmanship is concerned McNaughton's style, layout and design is reminiscent or modeled after the Italian renaissance painting tradition. I guess if you are ignorant, all those painters of the Italian renaissance could be accused of "painting historical figures doing nothing of interest." But only if you are ignorant and not well read or cultured.
Comment
-
i can't believe people get college degrees in this shitOriginally posted by tooblue View PostThey are both art to varying degrees. But, if we are to adhere to your premise as borrowed from a wayward Vonnegut, Robert Batemen is an illustrator and McNaughton is an artist principally because the first strives to recreate the beautiful through the application of remarkable painting techniques while the other strives to make a statement in a medium that happens to be painting, relying upon time honored painting techniques.
As far as his craftsmanship is concerned McNaughton's style, layout and design is reminiscent or modeled after the Italian renaissance painting tradition. I guess if you are ignorant, all those painters of the Italian renaissance could be accused of "painting historical figures doing nothing of interest." But only if you are ignorant and not well read or cultured.Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est.
Comment
-
Ha! Y'all's ignorant!Originally posted by tooblue View PostThey are both art to varying degrees. But, if we are to adhere to your premise as borrowed from a wayward Vonnegut, Robert Batemen is an illustrator and McNaughton is an artist principally because the first strives to recreate the beautiful through the application of remarkable painting techniques while the other strives to make a statement in a medium that happens to be painting, relying upon time honored painting techniques.
As far as his craftsmanship is concerned McNaughton's style, layout and design is reminiscent or modeled after the Italian renaissance painting tradition. I guess if you are ignorant, all those painters of the Italian renaissance could be accused of "painting historical figures doing nothing of interest." But only if you are ignorant and not well read or cultured."In conclusion, let me give a shout-out to dirty sex. What a great thing it is" - Northwestcoug
"And you people wonder why you've had extermination orders issued against you." - landpoke
"Can't . . . let . . . foolish statements . . . by . . . BYU fans . . . go . . . unanswered . . . ." - LA Ute
Comment
-
What are you wearing today? What packaging, if any, did the food you have eaten come in? Describe the decor in your home. Do you live in a neighborhood? That thing you drive, is it aesthetically pleasing and not merely a fine piece of engineering? Do you own a toothbrush? What are you reading this post on—is it aesthetically pleasing? Does your OS running on said device rely upon icons to ensure your user experience is intuitive?Originally posted by camleish View Posti can't believe people get college degrees in this shit
Answering the questions above will give you the answer to your question.Last edited by tooblue; 04-30-2011, 04:45 PM.
Comment
-
Great avatar Viking ... now, is that art or illustration?Originally posted by Viking View PostYes, he is analogous to the painters of the Italian Renaissance (do you say it:aye-talian? Just askin')
This is the point, TB, where you tell us you're just pegando nossos pés and later we all laugh about how well you suckered us
Comment
Comment