Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

3-2-1 method for smoked ribs

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by kccougar View Post
    My smoker is still at the cabin, but my wife bought a couple racks of ribs at Costco. Anyone had success grilling ribs (I only have a propane grill - no charcoal)?
    Two things to dowhen you find yourself in this predicament: 1. Obviously use indirect heat if possible. 2. make tin-foil smoke packets. Wrap wood chips in tinfoil then poke holes in the tin foil. Put the packets over the direct heat, and they'll add a very mild smoky flavor. It's not the same as cooking them in the smoker, but it's better than straight propane.
    Jesus wants me for a sunbeam.

    "Cog dis is a bitch." -James Patterson

    Comment


    • What I did: The ribs were a couple racks of st. louis style ribs from Costco, pre-rubbed. I thought I had a smoker box for wood chips, but I couldn't find it so I went the lazy way. Put the two racks of ribs on the middle and right side of the grill and then turned on the left burner. Threw a few larger chunks of cherry wood on the grill grate above the left burner and tried to keep the temp at about 250 degrees. It actually smoked pretty good, I think it would have been a decent substitute smoke method, but I didn't foil or anything, just cooked straight through for about 4.5 hours.

      With the St. Louis ribs, I should have gone longer or foiled with some liquid. I did slather with sauce for about the last 45 minutes. The meat was done, but it was not particularly tender. And I wasn't really a fan of the Costco rub, but my wife liked them, and we'll have leftovers tonight.
      "It's devastating, because we lost to a team that's not even in the Pac-12. To lose to Utah State is horrible." - John White IV

      Comment


      • "It's devastating, because we lost to a team that's not even in the Pac-12. To lose to Utah State is horrible." - John White IV

        Comment


        • Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
          In my pre smoker days, I would slow cook the ribs in a covered pan with some liquid at the bottom. Same principle...break down all the tissue. After they were basically done I would sauce and finish on the grill to get a char. They tasted very good but you don't get the smoke ring flavor. Liquid smoke now tastes weird to me so I wouldn't advise that route.
          This is what I still do. I finish them on the grill using cedar planks.
          *Banned*

          Comment


          • Forgive me El Duderino, for I have sinned. I followed the Traeger's recipe book 3-2-1 instructions and, while the results were still very good, the thick Costco ribs were just a little on the dry side. I think smoking the ribs for a full three hours is unnecessary (as you apparently observed), and I also cooked the final phase for a full hour, perhaps even a little longer. Your intermediate step is higher than the book's (275 vs. 225), but I suspect since that's while the ribs are encased in foil with apple juice (and I also throw in a little dark brown sugar and honey) the higher temp doesn't result in dryness. I vow to follow your instructions faithfully henceforth.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by PaloAltoCougar View Post
              Forgive me El Duderino, for I have sinned. I followed the Traeger's recipe book 3-2-1 instructions and, while the results were still very good, the thick Costco ribs were just a little on the dry side. I think smoking the ribs for a full three hours is unnecessary (as you apparently observed), and I also cooked the final phase for a full hour, perhaps even a little longer. Your intermediate step is higher than the book's (275 vs. 225), but I suspect since that's while the ribs are encased in foil with apple juice (and I also throw in a little dark brown sugar and honey) the higher temp doesn't result in dryness. I vow to follow your instructions faithfully henceforth.
              Go thy way and sin no more.

              The method described in the OP is remarkably consistent. Give it a shot next time. Also, I prefer St. Louis style ribs over baby back, but they are both good and it works equally well on both types.
              Last edited by Jeff Lebowski; 07-20-2014, 12:35 PM.
              "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
              "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
              "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

              Comment


              • Originally posted by PaloAltoCougar View Post
                Forgive me El Duderino, for I have sinned. I followed the Traeger's recipe book 3-2-1 instructions and, while the results were still very good, the thick Costco ribs were just a little on the dry side. I think smoking the ribs for a full three hours is unnecessary (as you apparently observed), and I also cooked the final phase for a full hour, perhaps even a little longer. Your intermediate step is higher than the book's (275 vs. 225), but I suspect since that's while the ribs are encased in foil with apple juice (and I also throw in a little dark brown sugar and honey) the higher temp doesn't result in dryness. I vow to follow your instructions faithfully henceforth.


                As an aside, how is is your wheel invention coming along?
                Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

                sigpic

                Comment


                • For those of us without traegers, how hot is the "smoke" setting?
                  At least the Big Ten went after a big-time addition in Nebraska; the Pac-10 wanted a game so badly, it added Utah
                  -Berry Trammel, 12/3/10

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by ERCougar View Post
                    For those of us without traegers, how hot is the "smoke" setting?
                    180-200
                    "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                    "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                    "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post


                      As an aside, how is is your wheel invention coming along?
                      Hey, I just discovered fire three weeks ago. I need time.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
                        180-200
                        Your excellency, it has to be lower than that as the Traeger control has "Smoke" the. Also a "180" setting. Forgive me for questioning your knowledge as your method for ribs is most amazing.

                        TR100_face.jpg
                        Get confident, stupid
                        -landpoke

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View Post
                          Your excellency, it has to be lower than that as the Traeger control has "Smoke" the. Also a "180" setting. Forgive me for questioning your knowledge as your method for ribs is most amazing.

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]4577[/ATTACH]
                          Interesting. Mine does not have a 180 setting. Goes from smoke to 225.
                          "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                          "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                          "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
                            Interesting. Mine does not have a 180 setting. Goes from smoke to 225.
                            More to the point, when mine is on smoke setting the temp on the gage on the top is usually 180-200.
                            "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                            "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                            "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                            Comment


                            • One more thing, there is nothing sacred about the 1.5-2.0-0.75 sequence outlined in the OP, other than it is a system that works consistently well with pellet smokers. I have noticed that some of the comp teams use a very similar sequence, but some of them start out with a 2 hour first stage (sometimes at a higher temp) followed by a shorter foil stage. I am sure we could find other combinations that work OK. If anyone has a different sequence that works great, let me know and I can add it to the OP.
                              "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                              "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                              "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                              Comment


                              • Personally, I'd reverse your smoke and foil times, but you may have already tried that. I think the foil ruins the bark, so I only did about an hour in foil yesterday and it seemed better.

                                I'm curious how your new smokers will do the drop from 275 to 225. I think it would take me a good half hour to drop that much--insulated smokers don't dissipate heat very well. The gravity feed may help though.
                                At least the Big Ten went after a big-time addition in Nebraska; the Pac-10 wanted a game so badly, it added Utah
                                -Berry Trammel, 12/3/10

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X