Watching this series the second time through is gonna be great, so will the third.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Breaking Bad
Collapse
X
-
No, that kid would have died regardless. Walt does not like loose ends.Originally posted by Commando View PostI'm calling BS on this one. That kid was out collecting spiders. All they had to do was wave and send the kid on his way. The kid would have had no concept of what was happening. There is literally nobody in that character's life who would bat an eye even if he related the whole story of four men hooking up hoses to a stationary train, collecting a fluid, and un-hooking as the train resumed its course-- let alone if he related what he actually probably saw, which was four men with a water pump and a hose high-fiving.
Say the kid asks a question-'what are you doing?' "We're testing for water contamination/collecting a deposit from this train. What's that you got there? A tarantula? Great! Have a nice day!" The kid's murder has been the biggest tragedy of the series, in my opinion, and one Walter was a reluctant party to, unfortunately. Much like the upcoming deaths of more innocents, he is not directly responsible for it, but is technically an accomplice."The mind is not a boomerang. If you throw it too far it will not come back." ~ Tom McGuane
Comment
-
Mike was running the show anyway, and, again, that kid was hardly a loose end.*Originally posted by Non Sequitur View PostNo, that kid would have died regardless. Walt does not like loose ends.
*and by hardly, I mean not at all. He had no incriminating knowledge, and even had he been aware of what the train contents were, those contents weren't on anybody's radar except higher-ups at DHS and the actual chemical company.Last edited by Commando; 08-20-2013, 06:10 PM."I'm anti, can't no government handle a commando / Your man don't want it, Trump's a bitch! I'll make his whole brand go under,"
Comment
-
I think the writers have done a brilliant job with character development. It's one of the best-written shows I've ever seen.If we disagree on something, it's because you're wrong.
"Somebody needs to kill my trial attorney." — Last words of George Harris, executed in Missouri on Sept. 13, 2000.
"Nothing is too good to be true, nothing is too good to last, nothing is too wonderful to happen." - Florence Scoville Shinn
Comment
-
And the fly was never going to really contaminate the lab. It's all part of Walt's pathology.Originally posted by Commando View PostMike was running the show anyway, and, again, that kid was hardly a loose end.*
*and by hardly, I mean not at all. He had no incriminating knowledge, and even had he been aware of what the train contents were, those contents weren't on anybody's radar except higher-ups at DHS and the actual chemical company."The mind is not a boomerang. If you throw it too far it will not come back." ~ Tom McGuane
Comment
-
That's the best argument you could have possibly made right there. Good job.Originally posted by Non Sequitur View PostAnd the fly was never going to really contaminate the lab. It's all part of Walt's pathology."I'm anti, can't no government handle a commando / Your man don't want it, Trump's a bitch! I'll make his whole brand go under,"
Comment
-
Amen. Had that same thought...and realized I don't know that I've ever thought that about any other TV show. There are shows I'm willing to watch again, or enjoy catching repeat episodes of, but I can't remember one that I've thought 'I can't wait for this to end so I can go back and start it all over.'Originally posted by scottie View PostWatching this series the second time through is gonna be great, so will the third.
Of course, I haven't watched The Wire yet, so....
Comment
-
I've watched The Wire twice now. It's still awesome.Originally posted by OhioBlue View PostAmen. Had that same thought...and realized I don't know that I've ever thought that about any other TV show. There are shows I'm willing to watch again, or enjoy catching repeat episodes of, but I can't remember one that I've thought 'I can't wait for this to end so I can go back and start it all over.'
Of course, I haven't watched The Wire yet, so...."Wuap's "problem" is that he is smart & principled & committed to a moral course of action. His actions are supposed to reflect his ethical code.
The rest of us rarely bother to think about our actions." --Solon
Comment
-
I got the first season of Fresh Prince of Bel Air via Netflix and while the early 90s styles are super dated, it is still a damn funny, family friendly show. I was impressed with how well it's held up.Originally posted by OhioBlue View PostAmen. Had that same thought...and realized I don't know that I've ever thought that about any other TV show."I'm anti, can't no government handle a commando / Your man don't want it, Trump's a bitch! I'll make his whole brand go under,"
Comment
-
Comment
-
I think this is when I fell in love with this show for reals. What an ingenious thematic plot device. These writers knocked this show out of the park inning after inning.Originally posted by wuapinmon View Post"I'm anti, can't no government handle a commando / Your man don't want it, Trump's a bitch! I'll make his whole brand go under,"
Comment
-
Exactly. And note what what Walt said when talking to Jesse afterwards. He never said "He made a mistake. He shouldn't have pulled the trigger." Rather he said, "It was unfortunate, but it had to be done. There was no other way."Originally posted by Non Sequitur View PostNo, that kid would have died regardless. Walt does not like loose ends.
That was one of the best episodes in the series. We watch these guys pull off this bold and ingenious heist with lots of close calls and just when we are all mentally high-fiving about it .... Boom! The kid steps out and gets shot. Back to reality. Brilliant.
The underlying theme of just about every mob/gangster movie or series is the escalating series of events where ethics, morality, and basic humanity have to be tossed aside in order to survive (or succeed) and the inevitable consequences of those choices."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
Originally posted by fusnik View PostI don't see Walt killing his wife, no way. The dude has a level of humanity that would disappear if he killed her.
Even Michael Corleone didn't kill his wife after her abortion.Originally posted by ERCougar View PostI guess I'm misunderstanding what you mean when someone could kill his own wife and not be any worse of a human being. That sounds pretty black.Originally posted by ERCougar View PostI'm not saying that you predicted you'd kill his wife. When I asked if he would be any worse morally if he did, you said no. I think he does, because I still see a shred of goodness in him. The question of whether I'm rooting for some redemption is a different one.Argh...Originally posted by CardiacCoug View PostHuge difference between killing other people who are "in the game" like Mike and Gus and even Jesse's druggy girlfriend and killing the mother of your children.
Do you folks never watch Dateline NBC or 48 Hours? People murder their spouses ALL THE TIME.
Here are some stats for you:
http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/mf.pdf
That adds up to about 16%.Among murder victims 6.5% were killed by their spouses, 3.5% by their parents, 1.9% by their own children, 1.5% by their siblings, and 2.6% by some other family member.
Again, I am not saying it is likely. I am just saying that at this point, you have to concede that Walt is the kind of person that could do it under the right circumstances. Furthermore, the fact that Walt has fallen so far means that he is capable of anything. He may not do it, but you have to admit that he would be capable.
Well said.Originally posted by mpfunk View PostI don't think Walt is 100%, but killing Skyler wouldn't be any worse than what he has already done. Let's see, killing a woman who has enabled Walt in his drug trade and benefited from all that Walt has done vs. poisoning a child. Also, make no mistake Todd did exactly what Walt wanted when he killed the kid. If Todd hadn't acted so fast, Walt would have found a way to take care of the kid another way.
Let's look at this a little differently. Look at what Walt has already done to Skylar through his actions. Her life is essentially over. Him asking her to spend the money on the kids is laughable. There is no way should she would ever be able to spend that money after he goes down. Furthermore, I still maintain that Skylar is dead by the end of the series. If any of you disagree, I would be willing to make a cash wager. Whether it happens by his hand or the hand of someone else, what difference will it make? He will have caused her death. So let's not pretend that this would be such a huge moral stretch for good old Mr. White."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
No bet. She's dead. I think the opening of Live Free or Die indicated that. I don't think Walt causes it directly, though, but I agree he's responsible.Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View PostArgh...
Do you folks never watch Dateline NBC or 48 Hours? People murder their spouses ALL THE TIME.
Here are some stats for you:
http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/mf.pdf
That adds up to about 16%.
Again, I am not saying it is likely. I am just saying that at this point, you have to concede that Walt is the kind of person that could do it under the right circumstances. Furthermore, the fact that Walt has fallen so far means that he is capable of anything. He may not do it, but you have to admit that he would be capable.
Well said.
Let's look at this a little differently. Look at what Walt has already done to Skylar through his actions. Her life is essentially over. Him asking her to spend the money on the kids is laughable. There is no way should she would ever be able to spend that money after he goes down. Furthermore, I still maintain that Skylar is dead by the end of the series. If any of you disagree, I would be willing to make a cash wager. Whether it happens by his hand or the hand of someone else, what difference will it make? He will have caused her death. So let's not pretend that this would be such a huge moral stretch for good old Mr. White.Awesomeness now has a name. Let me introduce myself.
Comment
-
I don't know that that is necessarily true. If Hank was the one to bring Walt in, that would resolve a lot of the concerns the DEA might have with the situation. I think the problem with Hank's boss was that he wasn't following the evidence and investigating Gus because of their social relationship. That isn't really true of Hank, and won't be true if he is the one to crack the case (like he did with Gus ... which he should get credit for).Originally posted by fusnik View PostHanks boss lost his job because of his relationship with Gus. That's how Hank gets his promotion.
Hank absolutely would lose his job if and when it comes to light that his BIL is possibly the biggest drug dealer to come out of ABQ.
What is true is that Hank has good reason to think his job is in seriously jeopardy because of his situation. I find the way he is acting to be completely consistent with his character. Hank, while a decent law enforcement agent and detective, has always been somewhat of a doofus and has shown a tendency to put his own ego ahead of his family. I don't think we should be surprised that he is making the decisions he is making.
Comment
Comment