Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Official Photography Thread
Collapse
X
-
Most cameras will underexpose wildlife in automatic mode. The background is often lighter than the subject and which leaves the subject too dark. Learning the exposure system of you camera is essential to getting an exposure with the most detail without blowing out the highlights (or sometimes choosing to do just that when needed). Human eyes can adapt for dark subject/light background (because the have more dynamic range and a huge computer to interpret the imagery). But yes, detail pulled from the shadows is often what makes wildlife images more interesting, usually pulling up the shadows at the same time increasing the contrast a bit. It's also helpful is the light is even (it was an overcast morning).Originally posted by mtnbiker View PostIt always amazes me how much you can pull out of the shadows without pushing it so far that it looks fake.
Here's the original:

And the edit (with a slight crop):

These are both clickable to see the full original sizes if desired.
Comment
-
haven’t done any processing yet... Focus is a bit off. It was really hard to get the focus right in the dark.
Taken last night.
C9ABBB3E-92AF-4FC5-B0A5-93FBF37BDC65.jpgI intend to live forever.
So far, so good.
--Steven Wright
Comment
-
Where were you when you took the picture?Originally posted by Brian View Posthaven’t done any processing yet... Focus is a bit off. It was really hard to get the focus right in the dark.
Taken last night.
[ATTACH]10004[/ATTACH]"I think it was King Benjamin who said 'you sorry ass shitbags who have no skills that the market values also have an obligation to have the attitude that if one day you do in fact win the PowerBall Lottery that you will then impart of your substance to those without.'"
- Goatnapper'96
Comment
-
In preparation for our Kenya trip (
that it still happens) I decided to finally get serious about shooting in RAW. I bought a used Canon body with a full-frame sensor, put on a wide angle lens, and went to the Muir Woods Forest. I'm using Canon's DPP 4 software to edit them.
_MG_7219a.jpg
_MG_7121.jpg"...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
Comment
-
Hell, I spent time editing them. Might as well share the rest!
_MG_7112.jpg
_MG_7175.jpg
_MG_7199a.jpg
_MG_7114.jpg"...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
Comment



























Comment