Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Random stuff worth reading on the internet thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Chutzpah? Is there a better word for this?

    For many cooks, waiters and bartenders, it is an annoying entrance fee to the food-service business: Before starting a new job, they pay around $15 to a company called ServSafe for an online class in food safety...

    But in taking the class, the workers — largely unbeknown to them — are also helping to fund a nationwide lobbying campaign to keep their own wages from increasing.

    The company they are paying, ServSafe, doubles as a fund-raising arm of the National Restaurant Association — the largest lobbying group for the food-service industry, claiming to represent more than 500,000 restaurant businesses. The association has spent decades fighting increases to the minimum wage at the federal and state levels, as well as the subminimum wage paid to tipped workers like waiters.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/17/u...-lobbying.html
    "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
    "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
    - SeattleUte

    Comment


    • Cargo ships can now deploy a kite to help with propulsion.

      https://www.goodnewsnetwork.org/watc...cut-emissions/

      Retrofitted onto the front of any container ship, this massive “parafoil” can generate 20% of the vessel’s total propulsion.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Bo Diddley View Post
        Cargo ships can now deploy a kite to help with propulsion.

        https://www.goodnewsnetwork.org/watc...cut-emissions/
        Wow, sea vessels moving through wind power. Wonder why we’ve never seen that before.
        τὸν ἥλιον ἀνατέλλοντα πλείονες ἢ δυόμενον προσκυνοῦσιν

        Comment


        • Aging Japanese mobsters looking to stay out of trouble (sort of) by joining a softball league. Interesting read:

          https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/08/w...mid=tw-nytimes
          "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
          "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
          - SeattleUte

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post
            Aging Japanese mobsters looking to stay out of trouble (sort of) by joining a softball league. Interesting read:

            https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/08/w...mid=tw-nytimes
            One of the apartments in my mission was next door to the local yakuza headquarters. They used to ask us to come play softball with them all the time. It was tempting, but no...
            "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
            "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
            "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post

              One of the apartments in my mission was next door to the local yakuza headquarters. They used to ask us to come play softball with them all the time. It was tempting, but no...
              Aw man. That would have made for a great memoir. Mormons and the mafia!
              "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
              "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
              - SeattleUte

              Comment


              • This is quite the courtroom story. Ex-Fugees star at the center of a multinational multibillion dollar scam. Leo DiCaprio, Scorsese, Obama, Trump, presidential pardons, requests to extradite Chinese nationals, it has it all!

                https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md...source=twitter
                "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
                "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
                - SeattleUte

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post
                  This is quite the courtroom story. Ex-Fugees star at the center of a multinational multibillion dollar scam. Leo DiCaprio, Scorsese, Obama, Trump, presidential pardons, requests to extradite Chinese nationals, it has it all!

                  https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md...source=twitter
                  Interesting topic, but that was a boring-ass read. 2/10, do not recommend.
                  Prepare to put mustard on those words, for you will soon be consuming them, along with this slice of humble pie that comes direct from the oven of shame set at gas mark “egg on your face”! -- Moss

                  There's three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who's got the same first name as a city; and never go near a lady's got a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, everything else is cream cheese. --Coach Finstock

                  Comment


                  • A Chicago circuit court judge barred the use of ballistics testing in a trial, which will probably reverberate nationally. This looong article explains the 'science' of ballistics firearm testing, how it is incorrectly viewed by both courtroom and lay people, and why in most cases it should be thrown out. At the very least if you read it, you will be convinced to lawyer up if there is ballistics evidence when you're a defendant in a trial:

                    https://radleybalko.substack.com/p/d...e-case-against
                    "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
                    "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
                    - SeattleUte

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post
                      A Chicago circuit court judge barred the use of ballistics testing in a trial, which will probably reverberate nationally. This looong article explains the 'science' of ballistics firearm testing, how it is incorrectly viewed by both courtroom and lay people, and why in most cases it should be thrown out. At the very least if you read it, you will be convinced to lawyer up if there is ballistics evidence when you're a defendant in a trial:

                      https://radleybalko.substack.com/p/d...e-case-against
                      Whoa. The whole field could face scrutiny.

                      Makes you wonder how many challenges are forthcoming from those already convicted.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post
                        A Chicago circuit court judge barred the use of ballistics testing in a trial, which will probably reverberate nationally. This looong article explains the 'science' of ballistics firearm testing, how it is incorrectly viewed by both courtroom and lay people, and why in most cases it should be thrown out. At the very least if you read it, you will be convinced to lawyer up if there is ballistics evidence when you're a defendant in a trial:

                        https://radleybalko.substack.com/p/d...e-case-against
                        Thanks - very interesting read. Kind of shocking, really.
                        "I think it was King Benjamin who said 'you sorry ass shitbags who have no skills that the market values also have an obligation to have the attitude that if one day you do in fact win the PowerBall Lottery that you will then impart of your substance to those without.'"
                        - Goatnapper'96

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Pelado View Post

                          Thanks - very interesting read. Kind of shocking, really.
                          I’ve probably said this before, but Radley Balko is an excellent journalist. A sensible non-crazy libertarian-lite who has made police and judicial misconduct reporting his life’s work.
                          "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
                          "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
                          - SeattleUte

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post
                            A Chicago circuit court judge barred the use of ballistics testing in a trial, which will probably reverberate nationally. This looong article explains the 'science' of ballistics firearm testing, how it is incorrectly viewed by both courtroom and lay people, and why in most cases it should be thrown out. At the very least if you read it, you will be convinced to lawyer up if there is ballistics evidence when you're a defendant in a trial:

                            https://radleybalko.substack.com/p/d...e-case-against
                            Okay, that was interesting.

                            I'm wondering if the defense could somehow test the person comparing two bullets to find out their error rate. I was thinking to gather 100 9mm pistols, maybe from the army or a large police department. Fire one bullet from each into some clay or something, then carefully retrieve it and stick it in a snack size ziplock bag. Do the same with the ejected cartridge. Put a 4-digit random number on each bag then note those in an Excel spreadsheet matching up with the gun serial number. To make it more interesting, don't save the bullets from about five of the tests and fire five other guns a second time to get the 100 bullets for testing. Then hand a box of bagged bullets, a box of bagged cartridges, and the pile of guns to the expert so see how many they can match. Include three boxes of the exact same ammuntion to simplify that part. That would produce some great percentage numbers for correct match, incorrect match, and inconclusive. I'm curious how long that would take the expert to do.

                            Since I don't own any firearms I'm guessing that I ought to be safe from having to worry about a wrongful conviction from bullet matching.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Scott R Nelson View Post
                              Since I don't own any firearms I'm guessing that I ought to be safe from having to worry about a wrongful conviction from bullet matching.
                              I took it to mean all sorts of pattern matching is suspect--not just ballistics.

                              Comment


                              • Seems like a dumb ruling.
                                "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                                "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                                "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X