I am going to say this as gently and kindly as I can:
Funk stop using drugs.
Scalley would be a very good Defensive Coordinator anywhere that he would have taken a job. He is meticulous. He pays attention to small details. And he is a fantastic recruiter. He has been an assistant coach for 8 years and was a player for 4 years in a successful system. Continuing his mentor-ship with Whittingham gives him a chance to be a great coordinator.
As far as the DC simply being Whitt's puppet, this season is slam dunk case evidence that the DC has autonomy to run and call the defense as they see fit. Utah's defense will always have Fred Whittingham's signature on it: A base four man front that primarily plays man to man coverage. But that is where the similarities between the defenses of Sitake and Pease end.
Sitake was a blitz heavy scheme that depended on chaos to be successful. He did not play much zone, and when he did, it wasn't very successful. His defense led to more sacks, but sacrificed that by giving up more long pass plays, and giving up big run plays when the blitz didn't get home. It also led to fewer interceptions as well.
Pease focused on gap control with the D-line staying in their lanes. Using the blitz about 70% less than Sitake. On the back end, he focused more on mixing and disguising coverage, and Utah played much less man and more and more complicated zone coverages. This philosophy led to fewer sacks, more interceptions, and a dramatically improved run defense (6th Nationally vs 61st nationally in 2014).
Scalley will be given the leeway to direct and call the defense as he sees fit. Just as Anderson, Sitake, and Pease were given the leeway to lead it based on their personal philosophies.
Funk stop using drugs.
Scalley would be a very good Defensive Coordinator anywhere that he would have taken a job. He is meticulous. He pays attention to small details. And he is a fantastic recruiter. He has been an assistant coach for 8 years and was a player for 4 years in a successful system. Continuing his mentor-ship with Whittingham gives him a chance to be a great coordinator.
As far as the DC simply being Whitt's puppet, this season is slam dunk case evidence that the DC has autonomy to run and call the defense as they see fit. Utah's defense will always have Fred Whittingham's signature on it: A base four man front that primarily plays man to man coverage. But that is where the similarities between the defenses of Sitake and Pease end.
Sitake was a blitz heavy scheme that depended on chaos to be successful. He did not play much zone, and when he did, it wasn't very successful. His defense led to more sacks, but sacrificed that by giving up more long pass plays, and giving up big run plays when the blitz didn't get home. It also led to fewer interceptions as well.
Pease focused on gap control with the D-line staying in their lanes. Using the blitz about 70% less than Sitake. On the back end, he focused more on mixing and disguising coverage, and Utah played much less man and more and more complicated zone coverages. This philosophy led to fewer sacks, more interceptions, and a dramatically improved run defense (6th Nationally vs 61st nationally in 2014).
Scalley will be given the leeway to direct and call the defense as he sees fit. Just as Anderson, Sitake, and Pease were given the leeway to lead it based on their personal philosophies.
Comment