Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Big Ten and Pac 12 Collaboration vs. Expansion..

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
    Agreed.

    At one per season, I have no heartburn with it, but as I stated before, this is something to excite Ute fans or Indiana fans. SC is already playing at least one good OOC every year so this isn't overly exciting in the slightest. In fact, SC has basically already been doing this....home and home with Minnesota, home and home with the Luckeyes, nebraska, etc. in the past decade, SC has beaten Michigan, Penn State, and Illinois in the Rose Bowl, Iowa in the Orange Bowl. In other words, this is a big snooze. Oregon started this season against LSU and could get more of those types of games if it wanted. Stanford could do so pretty easily, I would imagine.

    It will be nice for the Utes in the years they get to host the bigger name programs in the B1G. Nebraska at RES....pretty cool.
    It will also be nice for fans like me who every other year will get to go to a different big10 stadium. I think the only one I would have difficulty attending is nebraska.

    Sent from my SGH-T839 using Tapatalk
    "Be a philosopher. A man can compromise to gain a point. It has become apparent that a man can, within limits, follow his inclinations within the arms of the Church if he does so discreetly." - The Walking Drum

    "And here’s what life comes down to—not how many years you live, but how many of those years are filled with bullshit that doesn’t amount to anything to satisfy the requirements of some dickhead you’ll never get the pleasure of punching in the face." – Adam Carolla

    Comment


    • #47
      It's not a huge deal, but it's interesting. The Utes have such an enormous advantage over BYU due to the Pac12 membership.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
        Agreed.

        At one per season, I have no heartburn with it, but as I stated before, this is something to excite Ute fans or Indiana fans. SC is already playing at least one good OOC every year so this isn't overly exciting in the slightest. In fact, SC has basically already been doing this....home and home with Minnesota, home and home with the Luckeyes, nebraska, etc. in the past decade, SC has beaten Michigan, Penn State, and Illinois in the Rose Bowl, Iowa in the Orange Bowl. In other words, this is a big snooze. Oregon started this season against LSU and could get more of those types of games if it wanted. Stanford could do so pretty easily, I would imagine.

        It will be nice for the Utes in the years they get to host the bigger name programs in the B1G. Nebraska at RES....pretty cool.
        again.
        "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill


        "I only know what I hear on the news." - Dear Leader

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Mormon Red Death View Post
          It will also be nice for fans like me who every other year will get to go to a different big10 stadium. I think the only one I would have difficulty attending is nebraska.

          Sent from my SGH-T839 using Tapatalk
          this is true. You have an odd geography in all of this...fan of the Utes but living in B1G territory. I imagine it will be an every other year thing so at least you get one reasonable roadie every 2 seasons.
          Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

          sigpic

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by il Padrino Ute View Post
            again.
            Apparently you are not excited? I could have overstated because I personally don't think it is exciting at all.
            Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

            sigpic

            Comment


            • #51
              This is about 2 things(well one thing really)

              The first is money. Sponsorships: The Fed-Ex Pac-12/B1G Challenge eg. It is a vehicle to have a larger sponsorships, more things to brand, etc. The double header concept at neutral sites also is a big opportunity to exploit for $$$.

              The second is about TV content for the Big-10 and Pac-12 networks. To have a viable product for the third tier rights, you have to have games that people care about. This collaboration gives a means to improve the non conference schedules for a majority of the teams in the conference. If you look at the 2012OOC games for some random teams, there is a dire need for an upgrade from a quality standpoint:

              Oregon

              •09/01 - Arkansas State
              •09/08 - Fresno State
              •09/15 - Tennessee Tech


              Purdue

              •09/01 - Eastern Kentucky
              •09/08 - at Notre Dame
              •09/15 - Eastern Michigan
              •09/29 - Marshall


              Stanford

              •09/01 - San Jose State
              •09/08 - Duke
              •10/13 - at Notre Dame

              Iowa

              •09/01 - Northern Illinois (at Chicago, IL)
              •09/08 - Iowa State
              •09/15 - Northern Iowa
              •09/22 - Central Michigan


              The marquee games(USC-Michigan, etc) are going to be scooped up by the tier 1 & 2 television partners. But the third tier networks are going to see a big upgrade. A Utah-Iowa matchup does not have the interest of some of the bigger names, but it is more compelling from a TV standpoint than Iowa-Central Michigan or Utah-Utah State. These are the type of games that the two conferences need to improve the quality of the product of the Pac-12/Big Ten networks.

              As much as we want it to be about significant games, cool places to visit, etc. It is about the money, and that money is driven by TV ratings.
              "The first thing I learned upon becoming a head coach after fifteen years as an assistant was the enormous difference between making a suggestion and making a decision."

              "They talk about the economy this year. Hey, my hairline is in recession, my waistline is in inflation. Altogether, I'm in a depression."

              "I like to bike. I could beat Lance Armstrong, only because he couldn't pass me if he was behind me."

              -Rick Majerus

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by The Notorious J.I.C. View Post
                This is about 2 things(well one thing)....
                As much as we want it to be about significant games, cool places to visit, etc. It is about the money, and that money is driven by TV ratings.
                There you go again, bursting our bubbles....
                “There is a great deal of difference in believing something still, and believing it again.”
                ― W.H. Auden


                "God made the angels to show His splendour - as He made animals for innocence and plants for their simplicity. But men and women He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of their minds."
                -- Robert Bolt, A Man for All Seasons


                "It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
                --Antoine de Saint-Exupery

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
                  Apparently you are not excited? I could have overstated because I personally don't think it is exciting at all.
                  I am excited about it. I was rolling my eyes as you seem to think that Utah hasn't played Big 10 teams before.
                  "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill


                  "I only know what I hear on the news." - Dear Leader

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by The Notorious J.I.C. View Post
                    This is about 2 things(well one thing really)

                    The first is money. Sponsorships: The Fed-Ex Pac-12/B1G Challenge eg. It is a vehicle to have a larger sponsorships, more things to brand, etc. The double header concept at neutral sites also is a big opportunity to exploit for $$$.

                    The second is about TV content for the Big-10 and Pac-12 networks. To have a viable product for the third tier rights, you have to have games that people care about. This collaboration gives a means to improve the non conference schedules for a majority of the teams in the conference. If you look at the 2012OOC games for some random teams, there is a dire need for an upgrade from a quality standpoint:

                    Oregon

                    •09/01 - Arkansas State
                    •09/08 - Fresno State
                    •09/15 - Tennessee Tech


                    Purdue

                    •09/01 - Eastern Kentucky
                    •09/08 - at Notre Dame
                    •09/15 - Eastern Michigan
                    •09/29 - Marshall


                    Stanford

                    •09/01 - San Jose State
                    •09/08 - Duke
                    •10/13 - at Notre Dame

                    Iowa

                    •09/01 - Northern Illinois (at Chicago, IL)
                    •09/08 - Iowa State
                    •09/15 - Northern Iowa
                    •09/22 - Central Michigan


                    The marquee games(USC-Michigan, etc) are going to be scooped up by the tier 1 & 2 television partners. But the third tier networks are going to see a big upgrade. A Utah-Iowa matchup does not have the interest of some of the bigger names, but it is more compelling from a TV standpoint than Iowa-Central Michigan or Utah-Utah State. These are the type of games that the two conferences need to improve the quality of the product of the Pac-12/Big Ten networks.

                    As much as we want it to be about significant games, cool places to visit, etc. It is about the money, and that money is driven by TV ratings.
                    Great analysis. The only thing I have to add is that it puts the two conferences in position if big fish expansion (Texas & Notre Dame) happens.

                    Lets say the conferences like the agreement so well they both decide to play 8 conference games and have two collaboration games. Could that be the carrot that finally gets ND to go to the B1G? They already play 5 B1G and 2 PAC12 teams every year. Maybe the new BCS agreement is favorable to 14 team conferences (like a stipulation that you can have 3 teams in bcs games if your conference is 14 teams or higher).

                    Is it out of the realm of possibility that ND and Rutgers would join the B1G while Texas and maybe Air Force (fits the pac12 academic profile) join the Pac12? Its not likely but if there is one thing we have learned from expansion is that anything is possible.
                    "Be a philosopher. A man can compromise to gain a point. It has become apparent that a man can, within limits, follow his inclinations within the arms of the Church if he does so discreetly." - The Walking Drum

                    "And here’s what life comes down to—not how many years you live, but how many of those years are filled with bullshit that doesn’t amount to anything to satisfy the requirements of some dickhead you’ll never get the pleasure of punching in the face." – Adam Carolla

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by il Padrino Ute View Post
                      I am excited about it. I was rolling my eyes as you seem to think that Utah hasn't played Big 10 teams before.
                      im aware that Utah has played a B10 team before. What Utah cannot do, much like Indiana, is get home and homes with the marquee teams when it wants. Your excitement basically supports my theory.
                      Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

                      sigpic

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
                        im aware that Utah has played a B10 team before. What Utah cannot do, much like Indiana, is get home and homes with the marquee teams when it wants. Your excitement basically supports my theory.
                        No but apparently our conference can do something just as good if not better. Sort of a trivial point you are making, no?

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Some events I will like to see.

                          Football
                          Mich St./Michigan/Ohio St v PAC12 (preferrably Utah) @ Ford Field
                          Purdue/Iowa/Northwestern/Illinois vs PAC12 (preferrably Utah) @ Soldier Field
                          Utah @ Penn St (My father in law is a big Penn st fan so I would go to the game with him and his brother).

                          Utah vs B1G @ Dodger Stadium/New LA Stadium/Qualcomm/Vegas
                          Utah vs Michigan/Ohio St/Penn St/Nebraska @ Rice Eccles

                          Basketball
                          Saturday after conference championship football games.
                          4 game matchup @ the palace of Auburn Hills/United Center
                          Utah playing in Ann Arbor/East Lansing/Columbus or Bloomington
                          "Be a philosopher. A man can compromise to gain a point. It has become apparent that a man can, within limits, follow his inclinations within the arms of the Church if he does so discreetly." - The Walking Drum

                          "And here’s what life comes down to—not how many years you live, but how many of those years are filled with bullshit that doesn’t amount to anything to satisfy the requirements of some dickhead you’ll never get the pleasure of punching in the face." – Adam Carolla

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            I think anyone who cares about the BYU-Utah Rivalry game has to realize that this announcement reduces any chance that the rivalry will continue with any regularity beyond 2013.
                            Dio perdona tante cose per un’opera di misericordia
                            God forgives many things for an act of mercy
                            Alessandro Manzoni

                            Knock it off. This board has enough problems without a dose of middle-age lechery.

                            pelagius

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by pellegrino View Post
                              I think anyone who cares about the BYU-Utah Rivalry game has to realize that this announcement reduces any chance that the rivalry will continue with any regularity beyond 2013.
                              Yeah. I hate it, too. It was about the only real organic tradition either school had. Sadly it's not the only great rivalry that's dying in the next few years.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by UtahDan View Post
                                No but apparently our conference can do something just as good if not better. Sort of a trivial point you are making, no?
                                I forgot. You have been a fan of the PAC for a whole 12 months now. Get excited, I guess.
                                Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

                                sigpic

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X