Week 12

[SeattleUte]

Fight on, Trojans!

:usc: :fighton1:

Wilt the Stilt. still lol. Reminds me of when LA mixed up Phi Slamma Jamma and the Houston Rockets.

[UtahJazzFan88]

Fight on, Trojans!

:usc: :fighton1:

Ute fans are counting on the Trojans not taking the Battle for the Victory Bell lightly.

[Portland Ute]

Fight on, Trojans!

:usc: :fighton1:

For one week:

[Jarid in Cedar]

Suppose we get to the CHamp game and win. Could we be considered champs?

Yes

[TripletDaddy]

What are all the tie breakers in the new PAC? I have no clue.

Also, the PAC has to do something about scheduling. Perhaps move all cross divisional games to earlier in the season. If this were not a sanction year, then basically SC and Oregon would play again in two weeks in the same stadium. That seems weird for two teams to play each other in the same stadium within two weeks of each game. Technically, a game could be replayed two weeks in a row. That is also weird.

[UtahJazzFan88]

What are all the tie breakers in the new PAC? I have no clue.

Also, the PAC has to do something about scheduling. Perhaps move all cross divisional games to earlier in the season. If this were not a sanction year, then basically SC and Oregon would play again in two weeks in the same stadium. That seems weird for two teams to play each other in the same stadium within two weeks of each game. Technically, a game could be replayed two weeks in a row. That is also weird.

After reading that article that someone posted about rivalry games not being at the end of the year, it seems less likely. I agree though, who wouldn't want to see ASU/Utah this month instead of Oct. 1?

[SeattleUte]

What are all the tie breakers in the new PAC? I have no clue.

Also, the PAC has to do something about scheduling. Perhaps move all cross divisional games to earlier in the season. If this were not a sanction year, then basically SC and Oregon would play again in two weeks in the same stadium. That seems weird for two teams to play each other in the same stadium within two weeks of each game. Technically, a game could be replayed two weeks in a row. That is also weird.

It's not weird when it happens in the NFL. It only seem weird becaue we're not used to it.

[Jarid in Cedar]

What are all the tie breakers in the new PAC? I have no clue.

Also, the PAC has to do something about scheduling. Perhaps move all cross divisional games to earlier in the season. If this were not a sanction year, then basically SC and Oregon would play again in two weeks in the same stadium. That seems weird for two teams to play each other in the same stadium within two weeks of each game. Technically, a game could be replayed two weeks in a row. That is also weird.

1. Head to head
2. If three way tie, head to head within the tied group.
3. If still tied, then divisional record
4. If still tied, then record against best common opponent

This would be the extent of it this year, but it does go further.

[il Padrino Ute]

1. Head to head
2. If three way tie, head to head within the tied group.
3. If still tied, then divisional record
4. If still tied, then record against best common opponent

This would be the extent of it this year, but it does go further.

I think the tie breaker should be the head coaches kicking each other in the crotch until two of them give up.

[UtahJazzFan88]

I think the tie breaker should be the head coaches kicking each other in the crotch until two of them give up.

In that case, I think Whitt wins. Neuheisel looks like a pussy, Erickson will give Whitt a run, but he's too old.

[USCoug]

PAC south is a joke.

[Portland Ute]

PAC south is a joke.

Not as much as independence.

[UtahJazzFan88]

Any Neuheisel or Erickson prepared team is a joke.

Fixed.

[USCoug]

Not as much as independence.

I can agree with this.

[il Padrino Ute]

HFN - you okay man? Hope so.