2023 College Football thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Moliere
    replied
    It’s funny that people outside of Utah are just finding out how racist Utah is as a school. They have a racist mascot and employee a coach that has said racist things. It’s no surprise there are racial undertones in how their fans are talking about a successful black coach.

    Leave a comment:


  • Professor Cougar
    replied
    MIchigan is so overrated its ridiculous and Harbaugh is quite overrated himself; never liked that dude.

    Leave a comment:


  • Northwestcoug
    replied
    Strong 'three-peat' vibes. Harbaugh should move to trademark it:

    Leave a comment:


  • MartyFunkhouser
    replied
    Tennessee to wear alternative uniforms to honor the first black starting QB in the SEC. Pretty cool.

    Leave a comment:


  • myboynoah
    replied
    Originally posted by USUC View Post

    This was in my timeline this morning


    I saw that. So lol.

    Leave a comment:


  • MartyFunkhouser
    replied
    Originally posted by myboynoah View Post
    JazzyUte has always been a fucking idiot. By the way he is getting trashed by Ute fans for that tweet, and rightfully so.

    Leave a comment:


  • USUC
    replied
    Originally posted by Omaha 680 View Post

    Good grief...and Utah fans continue to forge new connections in their new conference.
    This was in my timeline this morning



    Leave a comment:


  • Omaha 680
    replied
    Originally posted by myboynoah View Post
    Good grief...and Utah fans continue to forge new connections in their new conference.

    Leave a comment:


  • Omaha 680
    replied
    Originally posted by Moliere View Post
    Let’s go Duke!
    I find Dabo to be in the running for most annoying coach in America any given year so it's always a good day when Clemson loses.

    Leave a comment:


  • myboynoah
    replied


    Leave a comment:


  • Moliere
    replied
    Let’s go Duke!

    Leave a comment:


  • Omaha 680
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post

    Tell me now Larry Scott was responsible for the P12 presidents turning down the $30M offer one year ago - and countering for $50M? Because that was the true nail in the coffin.
    For real. If the Pac 12 presidents couldn't recognize independently that the record deal larry Scott got the first time around was more a function of general contract explosion/inflation than the inherent value of Pac 12 athletics, it's more evidence of the general mutual fart-sniffing attitude that permeated that conference until its dying breath.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Lebowski
    replied
    Originally posted by Applejack View Post

    yes, they enabled him. But once the guy got the richest tv deal ever for a conference he (rightly) had a lot of breathing room from he presidents. And he took it and cashed in.
    Tell me now Larry Scott was responsible for the P12 presidents turning down the $30M offer one year ago - and countering for $50M? Because that was the true nail in the coffin.

    Leave a comment:


  • Applejack
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post

    The blame should begin and end with the university presidents.
    yes, they enabled him. But once the guy got the richest tv deal ever for a conference he (rightly) had a lot of breathing room from he presidents. And he took it and cashed in.

    Leave a comment:


  • Omaha 680
    replied
    Originally posted by BigFatMeanie View Post
    I read somewhere that the new clock rules were supposed to result in 7 fewer plays for each team, on average, and the ostensible reason was for "safety" - to reduce wear and tear and concussion risk and all that kind of stuff.
    Correct. They have rebranded the game reduction efforts to mean fewer plays because all of their efforts since the play clock changes many years ago have never reduced the overall duration of broadcasts; the rule changes have only replaced broadcast time with commercial time. Last year college games had on average 25 more plays than NFL games. So at least this new rebranding makes sense where the old effort to "reduce game length" was always fake.

    By the way, one sure fire way to reduce broadcast lengths substantially (if they cared about that) would be to ditch the cumbersome and disruptive NCAA replay review model in favor of something closer to what the NFL does. But excessive college reviews are prime commercial time so they will never do that.

    Leave a comment:

Working...