The Big 12 expansion groundswell

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ERCougar
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 10978

    #13021
    Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
    Berry Tramel ranks the B12 candidates. Don't click this link if you are hoping to see BYU ranked highly.

    http://blog.newsok.com/berrytramel/2...medium=twitter
    I'll save SU the effort...
    At least the Big Ten went after a big-time addition in Nebraska; the Pac-10 wanted a game so badly, it added Utah
    -Berry Trammel, 12/3/10

    Comment

    • TripletDaddy
      sweet triple
      • Nov 2008
      • 58186

      #13022
      Unknown bald guy with slight facial hair puts the brakes on B12 expansion

      Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

      sigpic

      Comment

      • Shaka
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2008
        • 10437

        #13023
        Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
        Unknown bald guy with slight facial hair puts the brakes on B12 expansion
        I did no such thing!

        Comment

        • TripletDaddy
          sweet triple
          • Nov 2008
          • 58186

          #13024
          The Most Exciting 7,200 seconds in college football: Clemson BOT meets this Thursday to discuss conference realignment and expansion
          Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

          sigpic

          Comment

          • Jeff Lebowski
            Corporate lackey for Jesus
            • Nov 2008
            • 69493

            #13025
            It seems that BYU's only hope for football salvation is 16 team super conferences. Yuck.
            "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
            "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
            "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

            Comment

            • USUC
              Chronic Poseur
              • Apr 2010
              • 8775

              #13026
              Hamilton from the Chicago Tribune says ND keeps the status quo:

              With every major or minor shift, breathless speculation about Notre Dame's fortunes will follow. But after June 20, and probably for a while, the most likely scenario for Notre Dame is also the one least likely to excite anyone but the rabid followers of the school:

              The Irish will be independent in football, still. They will be members of the Big East in most other endeavors, still.

              And, still, everyone will wonder when they won't be either anymore.
              http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports...620,full.story

              This coupled with Maryland, Miami, and VaTech saying they are committed to the ACC, I get the feeling there won't be any major conference realignment this year. I have my doubts about FSU and Clemson joining.

              Comment

              • TripletDaddy
                sweet triple
                • Nov 2008
                • 58186

                #13027
                If you are a conference commish, do you actively pursue Miami right now? they are radioactive and looking down the barrel at major sanctions. By the same token, do sanctions matter much these days if they are not SMU-caliber punishments?

                Also, part of me wonders whether Miami and Notre Dame still hate each other (I know they just played a bowl game). Would the addition of Miami to the B12 at all dissuade the Irish from joining up? Could it be a factor in their minds that they do not want to be conference mates with the Convicts?
                Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

                sigpic

                Comment

                • Viking
                  Banned
                  • Jun 2009
                  • 6470

                  #13028
                  The worst part about being a BYU fan is that there is no sense of accountability to the donors and alumni base that the administration conveys. Your avg grad can't criticize the decisions (or lack of decisions) made by the prez, because he's an "anointed" person.

                  Cecil is never going to apologize for completely getting the B12 opportunity dead wrong last year. The BOT will never do so. Instead, if the program dies a slow death (looks more likely) then Tom Holmoe will get the blame.

                  In other universities, there's donor accountability. Not at BYU. It really stinks.

                  I advised a kid for the first time in my life who is a prized recruit not to go to play foozball at BYU yesterday because I don't know what the administration is committed to but it's not greatness. I told him to go to Stanford.

                  I go back to the September moment we had...the B12 was unstable. It needed us. Beebe needed us. We were asking for the world and overplayed our hand.

                  It's classic short-term thinking: we have a nice contract, supposedly, with ESPN. However, what happens if the program suffers during the term of the contract and it's not renewed? Who will care about the interim $$ if we've put the entire value of the program at risk? It just doesn't seem like long-term thinking. Who cares about $6mm a year if we drop off the face of the planet once the contract ends? It is a HIGH risk, LOW return strategy and I just don't get it...

                  But it all comes back to accountability...there is NO accountability at BYU...

                  Comment

                  • Jeff Lebowski
                    Corporate lackey for Jesus
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 69493

                    #13029
                    Originally posted by Viking View Post
                    The worst part about being a BYU fan is that there is no sense of accountability to the donors and alumni base that the administration conveys. Your avg grad can't criticize the decisions (or lack of decisions) made by the prez, because he's an "anointed" person.

                    Cecil is never going to apologize for completely getting the B12 opportunity dead wrong last year. The BOT will never do so. Instead, if the program dies a slow death (looks more likely) then Tom Holmoe will get the blame.

                    In other universities, there's donor accountability. Not at BYU. It really stinks.

                    I advised a kid for the first time in my life who is a prized recruit not to go to play foozball at BYU yesterday because I don't know what the administration is committed to but it's not greatness. I told him to go to Stanford.

                    I go back to the September moment we had...the B12 was unstable. It needed us. Beebe needed us. We were asking for the world and overplayed our hand.

                    It's classic short-term thinking: we have a nice contract, supposedly, with ESPN. However, what happens if the program suffers during the term of the contract and it's not renewed? Who will care about the interim $$ if we've put the entire value of the program at risk? It just doesn't seem like long-term thinking. Who cares about $6mm a year if we drop off the face of the planet once the contract ends? It is a HIGH risk, LOW return strategy and I just don't get it...

                    But it all comes back to accountability...there is NO accountability at BYU...
                    How is all that BYU stock you were buying up over the winter? (snicker)
                    "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                    "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                    "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                    Comment

                    • Viking
                      Banned
                      • Jun 2009
                      • 6470

                      #13030
                      Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
                      How is all that BYU stock you were buying up over the winter? (snicker)
                      Value trap. It happens.

                      Comment

                      • ERCougar
                        Junior Member
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 10978

                        #13031
                        I would advise any kid to go to stanford, big 12 or not. Good move.
                        At least the Big Ten went after a big-time addition in Nebraska; the Pac-10 wanted a game so badly, it added Utah
                        -Berry Trammel, 12/3/10

                        Comment

                        • Viking
                          Banned
                          • Jun 2009
                          • 6470

                          #13032
                          What is the upside of the independence move? I don't get it. Why take the risks?? It seems like very low risk/reward. Who can enlighten me?

                          Comment

                          • Maximus
                            Senior Member
                            • Sep 2009
                            • 6010

                            #13033
                            Originally posted by Viking View Post
                            What is the upside of the independence move? I don't get it. Why take the risks?? It seems like very low risk/reward. Who can enlighten me?
                            Being in the MWC would be a lot better

                            Comment

                            • Viking
                              Banned
                              • Jun 2009
                              • 6470

                              #13034
                              Originally posted by Maximus View Post
                              Being in the MWC would be a lot better
                              I don't mean that decision. I mean turning down the B12 last year.

                              Comment

                              • ERCougar
                                Junior Member
                                • Nov 2008
                                • 10978

                                #13035
                                Originally posted by Viking View Post
                                I don't mean that decision. I mean turning down the B12 last year.
                                I think youre the only one who really believes that happened.
                                At least the Big Ten went after a big-time addition in Nebraska; the Pac-10 wanted a game so badly, it added Utah
                                -Berry Trammel, 12/3/10

                                Comment

                                Working...