The Big 12 expansion groundswell

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Omaha 680
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 11159

    #12091
    Originally posted by Uncle Ted View Post
    Independence may not be an option for long when even the Pac-whatever is pushing for a playoff...



    If the playoff comes then BYU will have no choice but to conference up, IMO.
    I'm resigned to the fact a playoff will happen. I just hope it's four teams and not 8 or 16. I understand the clamor for a playoff, but Scott claiming the BCS poll doesn't account for strength of schedule is funny.

    Comment

    • Pelado
      Bald not naked
      • Sep 2010
      • 21065

      #12092
      Originally posted by Omaha 680 View Post
      I'm resigned to the fact a playoff will happen. I just hope it's four teams and not 8 or 16. I understand the clamor for a playoff, but Scott claiming the BCS poll doesn't account for strength of schedule is funny.
      It definitely accounts for strength of schedule, but he's right. Teams can get more benefit from being undefeated than by losing a game against a top schedule. Teams are generally dissuaded from scheduling top tier matchups. Recent teams that have bucked that trend:

      LSU last year
      Alabama with its Penn State contract
      USC pretty much all the time
      "I think it was King Benjamin who said 'you sorry ass shitbags who have no skills that the market values also have an obligation to have the attitude that if one day you do in fact win the PowerBall Lottery that you will then impart of your substance to those without.'"
      - Goatnapper'96

      Comment

      • ERCougar
        Junior Member
        • Nov 2008
        • 10978

        #12093
        Originally posted by Omaha 680 View Post
        I'm resigned to the fact a playoff will happen. I just hope it's four teams and not 8 or 16. I understand the clamor for a playoff, but Scott claiming the BCS poll doesn't account for strength of schedule is funny.
        Why do you hope it's not 8? I think 6 or 8 would be perfect (16's too big). Two rounds before Christmas, championship after.
        At least the Big Ten went after a big-time addition in Nebraska; the Pac-10 wanted a game so badly, it added Utah
        -Berry Trammel, 12/3/10

        Comment

        • Omaha 680
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2011
          • 11159

          #12094
          Originally posted by ERCougar View Post
          Why do you hope it's not 8? I think 6 or 8 would be perfect (16's too big). Two rounds before Christmas, championship after.
          I like the college football regular season...much more than I care about a clear national championship. I realize I am in a tiny minority though. 4 teams wouldn't diminish the value of any games. If you go to 8 and start guaranteeing spots to conference champions, September effectively becomes the NFL preseason. Also, many of the epic, season-ending rivalry clashes between highly ranked teams would mean less as more playoff spots are added.

          Comment

          • Uncle Ted
            The Big 12 money shot.
            • Apr 2010
            • 28853

            #12095
            Originally posted by ERCougar View Post
            Why do you hope it's not 8? I think 6 or 8 would be perfect (16's too big). Two rounds before Christmas, championship after.
            But I would love watching 16th seed BYU knock off top seed Oklahoma...

            "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
            "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
            "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
            GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

            Comment

            • Eddie
              Senior Member
              • Apr 2009
              • 8098

              #12096
              Originally posted by Uncle Ted View Post
              Independence may not be an option for long when even the Pac-whatever is pushing for a playoff...

              If the playoff comes then BYU will have no choice but to conference up, IMO.
              That can't possibly be real. The PACXII wants a playoff? But what about the hundreds of years of tradition? What about the Rose bowl? What is wrong with them, throwing that all away!!!

              Comment

              • Paperback Writer
                Signature won a Pulitzer
                • Nov 2010
                • 5211

                #12097
                Originally posted by Omaha 680 View Post
                I like the college football regular season...much more than I care about a clear national championship. I realize I am in a tiny minority though. 4 teams wouldn't diminish the value of any games. If you go to 8 and start guaranteeing spots to conference champions, September effectively becomes the NFL preseason. Also, many of the epic, season-ending rivalry clashes between highly ranked teams would mean less as more playoff spots are added.
                Something to consider that you should be familar with. In 1981, Nebraska's OOC schedule was: Iowa, Florida St., Penn St., and Auburn. Back then, teams were not afraid of losing one game and being eliminated from BCS title game consideration. Having a playoff where major conference winners were guaranteed spots in a post-season playoff would most likely result in more high-quality OOC games. So a team like 1981 Nebraska could still lose a couple of tough OOC games and still make the playoffs by winning their conference.

                Also factored in with the fear of losing a tough OOC game and being eliminated from BCS title game consideration, is the greed of major programs like Nebraska that insist on 7-home game schedules. That results in buying games that an opponent has little chance of winning and getting an that extra home game. If a playoff resulted in more high quality OOC games and an end to scheduling Idaho St., South Dakota St., or Chattanooga; I'm all in favor of it.

                Anyway, I'd like to see an 8 team playoff with auto bids for the PAC-12, Big 12, SEC, Big Ten, and ACC. And I think there will be a better chance of getting more high quality OOC games if a team makes the playoffs by winning their conference. Playing tough OOC games gives a program a much better idea where it stands before entering conference play.
                “Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
                "All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel

                Comment

                • Omaha 680
                  Senior Member
                  • Jul 2011
                  • 11159

                  #12098
                  Originally posted by Paperback Writer View Post
                  Something to consider that you should be familar with. In 1981, Nebraska's OOC schedule was: Iowa, Florida St., Penn St., and Auburn. Back then, teams were not afraid of losing one game and being eliminated from BCS title game consideration. Having a playoff where major conference winners were guaranteed spots in a post-season playoff would most likely result in more high-quality OOC games. So a team like 1981 Nebraska could still lose a couple of tough OOC games and still make the playoffs by winning their conference.

                  Also factored in with the fear of losing a tough OOC game and being eliminated from BCS title game consideration, is the greed of major programs like Nebraska that insist on 7-home game schedules. That results in buying games that an opponent has little chance of winning and getting an that extra home game. If a playoff resulted in more high quality OOC games and an end to scheduling Idaho St., South Dakota St., or Chattanooga; I'm all in favor of it.
                  It could go that way in theory. But in reality I fear we'll lose the 1-2 good OOC matchups the BCS teams schedule per year. All September games will become tuneup games because there would literally be zero reason to schedule up. Of course, for the majority of the SEC this would not be a change.

                  Comment

                  • Paperback Writer
                    Signature won a Pulitzer
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 5211

                    #12099
                    Originally posted by Uncle Ted View Post
                    While the 16-team playoff idea has much merit, the details are somewhat flawed. Your 16-team playoff has 5 teams from the Big 12. BYU better stay independent because under your bracket, half the Big 12 makes the playoffs with BYU in the Big 12. However, such a bracket could be defended if Nebraska were in the playoff picture I also like the fact that Georgia and Florida play each other in the first round - World's largest Outdoor Cocktail Party II. Will the game be played in Jacksonville?
                    “Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
                    "All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel

                    Comment

                    • Portland Ute
                      Junior Member
                      • Dec 2008
                      • 5647

                      #12100
                      Originally posted by Omaha 680 View Post
                      I like the college football regular season...much more than I care about a clear national championship. I realize I am in a tiny minority though. 4 teams wouldn't diminish the value of any games. If you go to 8 and start guaranteeing spots to conference champions, September effectively becomes the NFL preseason. Also, many of the epic, season-ending rivalry clashes between highly ranked teams would mean less as more playoff spots are added.
                      I agree with this.

                      Anymore than 6 or 8 and you'd be better served by eliminating all but one OOC game early in the year and then moving into a playoff and bowls for teams that are good but don't make the cut.
                      Also, many of the epic, season-ending rivalry clashes between highly ranked teams would mean less as more playoff spots are added.
                      Disagree. Most of those games are already played between in-conference foes. The conference championship and pride and a trip to the playoff will still be on the line. Outside of in-conference games between rivals, it's rare that your scenario happens. It's not as if the USC/ND game is determining which one will be a NC or, say, the Clemson/SC game. There just aren't that many rivalries that are out of conference that involve two highly ranked teams for this to matter.

                      Comment

                      • Paperback Writer
                        Signature won a Pulitzer
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 5211

                        #12101
                        Originally posted by Omaha 680 View Post
                        It could go that way in theory. But in reality I fear we'll lose the 1-2 good OOC matchups the BCS teams schedule per year. All September games will become tuneup games because there would literally be zero reason to schedule up. Of course, for the majority of the SEC this would not be a change.
                        I guess I see it differently. I think major programs would schedule more high-quality OOC games. It depends how one looks at it. If Alabama has LSU early in the SEC schedule, would they not have an advantage from already playing Penn St. and Oklahoma? I also think the networks would encourage better OOC games for the sake of ratings. College football fans of all programs want to see Alabama-Oklahoma. And if the Crimson Tide loses to both Penn St. and Oklahoma, they can still make the playoffs and win another national title by winning the SEC.
                        “Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
                        "All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel

                        Comment

                        • LiveCoug
                          LA Ute loves me
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 18477

                          #12102
                          Guys. Back on track, please.

                          Comment

                          • SeattleUte
                            Faith crisis consultant
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 20837

                            #12103
                            Originally posted by The Moose's Whistle 73
                            I don't know why we're talking about a playoff when the topic clearly states: "Big 12 Expansion Groundswell".

                            This topic is so old, I suggest we dig up Anne Richards grave. Let's exhume that whole story, it's just as relevant as the current discussion.
                            You have no right to post here.
                            When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.

                            --Jonathan Swift

                            Comment

                            • Uncle Ted
                              The Big 12 money shot.
                              • Apr 2010
                              • 28853

                              #12104
                              Originally posted by Paperback Writer View Post
                              While the 16-team playoff idea has much merit, the details are somewhat flawed. Your 16-team playoff has 5 teams from the Big 12. BYU better stay independent because under your bracket, half the Big 12 makes the playoffs with BYU in the Big 12. However, such a bracket could be defended if Nebraska were in the playoff picture I also like the fact that Georgia and Florida play each other in the first round - World's largest Outdoor Cocktail Party II. Will the game be played in Jacksonville?
                              I don't see the problem.

                              BTW, ESPN picked these teams but, of course, they are heavily invested in the B12.
                              "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
                              "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
                              "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
                              GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

                              Comment

                              • Art Vandelay
                                Striving for mediocrity
                                • Jul 2009
                                • 10516

                                #12105
                                Originally posted by The Moose's Whistle 75
                                LOL!!!

                                I'm not sure that I don't have a right to post here. But regardless, I do anyway. And I always will. LOL! You're funny SeattleUte. Nice try.
                                I wish I had this man's single-mindedness towards any one thing in my life. I barely have the effort to think of a new work password every 90 days, yet he somehow can go through the effort to create a new moniker, in order to make one (usually stupid) post. Impressive, in its own demented way.

                                Comment

                                Working...