Originally posted by Marvelous
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Big 12 expansion groundswell
Collapse
X
-
OTOH, if we stink it up for a few years as an independent, then all the good schools will want to schedule us because we will be an easy victory but all of our indy loving fans will still show up. Except for a few of us here on CUF, that is.PLesa excuse the tpyos.
-
Originally posted by creekster View PostWe know how accurate some of the inside sources have been and how higly you regard themI think I said we should wait for more credible evidence.Originally posted by Jacob View PostA source "close to BYU" who admits in the same quote that he doesn't know. Nice.
I was simply pointing out that I don't think the author is claiming the same source for both portions of the blurb. As you read it, do you agree? or do you think the B12 "source" is also the "source" speaking about BYU?Fitter. Happier. More Productive.
sigpic
Comment
-
I read it as you did. But the quote itself belies that the source was very close to BYU's decision makers. So it might as well have been a source not close to BYU.Originally posted by TripletDaddy View PostI think I said we should wait for more credible evidence.
I was simply pointing out that I don't think the author is claiming the same source for both portions of the blurb. As you read it, do you agree? or do you think the B12 "source" is also the "source" speaking about BYU?
Comment
-
Yup, and damn proud of it!Originally posted by dabrockster View Postatheistcougar =
I could show you all my vim plugins and open source projects, if you'd like...
Don't worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are any good, you'll have to ram them down people's throats.
- Howard Aiken
Any sufficiently complicated platform contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of a functional programming language.
- Variation on Greenspun's Tenth Rule
Comment
-
If we have continual seasons like Arizona and Colorado do, we won't fill up half of LES. The unfortunate truth is our fanbase (just like Utah's) won't come to games if we're not winning. However, the stadium will always be full if we're winning. Even if it is against Weber, SJSU and USU.Originally posted by dabrockster View PostI think most BYU fans would disagree with this. I'd rather see BYU play with the Big Boys more than anything... Having a OU vs BYU or a BYU vs Baylor of BU vs KSU etc sound much more fun then SJSU,. Weber St. USU etc...
Even if we lose more I'd still be pumped about those games vs the lames ass schedule we got going on right now... Hell, they are still trying to fill schedules for next year etc..."To the man who only has a hammer, everything he encounters begins to look like a nail."
—Abraham Maslow
Comment
-
This is what the argument for independence over the B12 is. Winning fills the seats and provides donors it doesn't matter about the competition. When BYU was winning in the late 70s-early 90s they were playing garbage home schedules but winning almost every home game. They averaged 100%+ capacity. From 1992 when they started playing tougher home games and not winning all of them they stopped selling 100% of tickets.Originally posted by WashingtonCoug View PostI would most definitely go independent rather than having losing season after losing season. I would rather be BYU and independent and winning games than Arizona, Colorado or Utah.
I had this discussion once with BYU71 on CG.
http://cougarguard.com/forum/showpos...2&postcount=60Get confident, stupid
-landpoke
Comment
-
The failed logic in this is that you can't compare a home schedule draw against WAC/MWC foes and the likes of OU, UT, TT, OSU and other Big 12 teams.Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View PostThis is what the argument for independence over the B12 is. Winning fills the seats and provides donors it doesn't matter about the competition. When BYU was winning in the late 70s-early 90s they were playing garbage home schedules but winning almost every home game. They averaged 100%+ capacity. From 1992 when they started playing tougher home games and not winning all of them they stopped selling 100% of tickets.
I had this discussion once with BYU71 on CG.
http://cougarguard.com/forum/showpos...2&postcount=60Don't worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are any good, you'll have to ram them down people's throats.
- Howard Aiken
Any sufficiently complicated platform contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of a functional programming language.
- Variation on Greenspun's Tenth Rule
Comment
-
We were in the 70's through the early 90's. Then we left ESPN and what was working for us. We spent the better part of the 2000's not on ESPN and trying to be a program that we aren't.Originally posted by Coach McGuirk View Postwe haven't been boise either. S, JBH!
I have no idea what S, JBH means."To the man who only has a hammer, everything he encounters begins to look like a nail."
—Abraham Maslow
Comment
-
It is true that BYU fans are stupid. However, I think that losing to the Big 12 teams would have less of an impact on attendance than losing to WAC teams.Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View PostThis is what the argument for independence over the B12 is. Winning fills the seats and provides donors it doesn't matter about the competition. When BYU was winning in the late 70s-early 90s they were playing garbage home schedules but winning almost every home game. They averaged 100%+ capacity. From 1992 when they started playing tougher home games and not winning all of them they stopped selling 100% of tickets.
I had this discussion once with BYU71 on CG.
http://cougarguard.com/forum/showpos...2&postcount=60Dyslexics are teople poo...
Comment
-
If we're so bad that we're going to be losing to WAC teams, we might as well quite right now. If we're losing to WAC teams, then we're getting blown out and shut out by Big 12 teams. Either of those scenarios means a half filled stadium or worse.Originally posted by Flystripper View PostIt is true that BYU fans are stupid. However, I think that losing to the Big 12 teams would have less of an impact on attendance than losing to WAC teams."To the man who only has a hammer, everything he encounters begins to look like a nail."
—Abraham Maslow
Comment
-
BYU had so much demand for tickets playing WAC or sub-WAC foes like Bowling Green and Long Beach State that it required 20,000 seats (50% of capacity) expansion to the stadium. Since BYU started scheduling harder opponents 1-3 times a year in 1992 they only have 3-4 years of averaging a sell out.Originally posted by atheistcougar View PostThe failed logic in this is that you can't compare a home schedule draw against WAC/MWC foes and the likes of OU, UT, TT, OSU and other Big 12 teams.
So if BYU were to continue to win these harder games at the current % they are winning them you would see a need for the stadium to expand by 30,000 seats (50% of current capacity) when?Get confident, stupid
-landpoke
Comment
-
There is a lot of truth to this regarding the fair weather fans. However, I see that as a plus, as I won't have to deal with the idiots who only showed up after Meyer's first season. I had fun at the games before this decade and will continue to have fun now. Even if Utah returns to sucktitude, it's better to be in a conference that allows me to see teams like USC and ASU come to town every other year and teams like Oregon and Stanford in RES every 4 years.Originally posted by WashingtonCoug View PostIf we have continual seasons like Arizona and Colorado do, we won't fill up half of LES. The unfortunate truth is our fanbase (just like Utah's) won't come to games if we're not winning. However, the stadium will always be full if we're winning. Even if it is against Weber, SJSU and USU."Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill
"I only know what I hear on the news." - Dear Leader
Comment

Comment