How about a series. Not just a county series, state series, but a World Series

[HBCoug]

I'm taking the Pirates in 6 games over whoever from the league that doesn't play real baseball.

I'd be shocked to see this next series go 6 games. Actually, I'll guarantee it won't.

[MarkGrace]

I'm taking the Pirates in 6 games over whoever from the league that doesn't play real baseball.

The weird thing about liking the M's is that I'm still so much more of an NL baseball fan. It's the real man's game.

[Donuthole]

I'd be shocked to see this next series go 6 games. Actually, I'll guarantee it won't.

I think that was a WS prediction.

[Moliere]

I'd be shocked to see this next series go 6 games. Actually, I'll guarantee it won't.

I was talking about the World Series as evidenced by the fact I'm was including two different leagues in the prediction.

[MartyFunkhouser]

You become unbearable during hockey season.

http://video.blackhawks.nhl.com/vide...449681&lang=en

1380727_10151967603629258_1278579200_n.jpg1374240_10151967627149258_1375806342_n.jpg1157449_10151967603904258_655474541_n.jpg

[HBCoug]

I was talking about the World Series as evidenced by the fact I'm was including two different leagues in the prediction.

My bad. I assumed you were referring to the only other series the Bucs will play in this post-season.

[Moliere]

My bad. I assumed you were referring to the only other series the Bucs will play in this post-season.

HBCoug

[TripletDaddy]

Im confused. The premise of this thread appears to be to project which team will win the WS. Ranking were provided. Shortly thereafter, those rankings were proven incorrect when a lower seeded team eliminated a higher seeded team. Today, the purpose of the rankings seems to have shifted from a prediction of WS winner to a list of which teams were better over 162 games.

[TripletDaddy]

The weird thing about liking the M's is that I'm still so much more of an NL baseball fan. It's the real man's game.

can anyone name a time when MarkGrace said anything other than the absolute truth? sorry, but I can't.

[Flystripper]

I have not read the thread but the Dodgers are going to win it all based on their starting pitching.

[TripletDaddy]

I have not read the thread but the Dodgers are going to win it all based on their starting pitching.

can anyone name a time when Flystripper said anything other than the absolute truth? sorry, but I can't.

[MartyFunkhouser]

Im confused. The premise of this thread appears to be to project which team will win the WS. Ranking were provided. Shortly thereafter, those rankings were proven incorrect when a lower seeded team eliminated a higher seeded team. Today, the purpose of the rankings seems to have shifted from a prediction of WS winner to a list of which teams were better over 162 games.

The rankings were never who is most likely to win the World Series. The list was always which teams were best over 162 games. I'm not going to pretend to ever predict the World Series with the amount of luck that goes into it.

[Flystripper]

http://video.blackhawks.nhl.com/vide...449681&lang=en

[ATTACH]3077[/ATTACH][ATTACH]3078[/ATTACH][ATTACH]3079[/ATTACH]

I only replied with a quote in this instance because more of that picture is a good thing.

[TripletDaddy]

The rankings were never who is most likely to win the World Series. The list was always which teams were best over 162 games. I'm not going to pretend to ever predict the World Series with the amount of luck that goes into it.

So what the hell, A's in 6 over the Dodgers.

[MartyFunkhouser]

Good news is that with the way everything is set up with the playoffs, it doesn't really matter who is best because it is just going to be won by the luckiest.

So what the hell, A's in 6 over the Dodgers.

The A's-Dodgers prediction is nothing more than what I want to happen. I have no way to guess which teams are going to be most lucky.