JuWan Pierre might be the only person that cares about the Dodgers happy about this.
Manny gone for 50?
Collapse
X
-
-
-
I am pretty sure it is 50 games without pay.Originally posted by Color Me Badd Fan View PostI'm thinking the Dodgers DO have to still paying him. I really, really doubt there''s any clause in any Manny's contract that gives the team an out if the player is caught using roids."Take it to the Bank"
Comment
-
It is. No player will have a clause that says that they still get paid if they are suspended for using PEDs. That is ridiculous. What team would agree to that? Why do you think the players union is so vigilant about obstructing testing and test results?Originally posted by Hot Lunch View PostI am pretty sure it is 50 games without pay.Fitter. Happier. More Productive.
sigpic
Comment
-
I don't think he used PEDs, but I'm pretty sure he made a deal with the Prince of Darkness in order to have the skills he had, especially in 1979.Originally posted by TripletDaddy View PostWhat about Kent Tekulve? Dude looks all natural to me.
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill
"I only know what I hear on the news." - Dear Leader
Comment
-
An article about ManRam's suspension
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-...,6324894.story
Also, look at what The Oracle said about ManRam......love him or hate him, but you can't deny that he is pretty much ALWAYS right. This means that I love Ken Griffey, Jr and his annually inflamed colon.The suspension will cost Ramirez $7.7 million, or roughly 31% of his $25-million salary. Players in violation of baseball's drug policy are not paid during suspensions.
In an appearance at USC last month, Jose Canseco said Ramirez's name "is most likely, 90%" on a list of 104 players that failed a drug test in 2003. The players were promised anonymity for taking tests in 2003; Rodriguez is the only player that has been identified among that group.
Ramirez laughed when Times columnist Kurt Streeter relayed Canseco's allegation to him.
"I got no comment, nothing to say about that," Ramirez told Streeter. "What can I say? I don't even know the guy."Fitter. Happier. More Productive.
sigpic
Comment
-
That shirt is rad.Originally posted by MarkGrace View PostMy dad has this t-shirt: http://i3.tinypic.com/23lm8nn.jpg
Here is another shot of the Man Least Likely to have Used Steroids:
Fitter. Happier. More Productive.
sigpic
Comment
-
How about Tony Gwynn? The tail end of his career occurred during the steroid era.Originally posted by mpfunk View PostThe only player that I would ever be surprised if it came out that he was using is Greg Maddux.
I'm becoming more cynical all the time, I thought Manny was just a natural. Shame on me.
I think if someone looks at the homerun numbers during the last few years before the steroid era and then looks at players numbers now, I think you can still find a few of the great players that may not be using. In the late 80s, hitting 30 homeruns was a big deal. With the large volume of guys hitting over 30, these guys need to be looked at.
Derek Jeter has never hit over 24 homeruns in a season. He's been remarkably consistent over the years and has only missed more than 30 games in a season once. The introduction of testing has not decreased his performance or time out on the field. I haven't yet reached a point where I think someone with Jeter's numbers is taking roids.Part of it is based on academic grounds. Among major conferences, the Pac-10 is the best academically, largely because of Stanford, Cal and UCLA. “Colorado is on a par with Oregon,” he said. “Utah isn’t even in the picture.”
Comment
-
I don't think that a player like Jeter is using roids, it just wouldn't surprise me if he was using.Originally posted by Color Me Badd Fan View PostHow about Tony Gwynn? The tail end of his career occurred during the steroid era.
I'm becoming more cynical all the time, I thought Manny was just a natural. Shame on me.
I think if someone looks at the homerun numbers during the last few years before the steroid era and then looks at players numbers now, I think you can still find a few of the great players that may not be using. In the late 80s, hitting 30 homeruns was a big deal. With the large volume of guys hitting over 30, these guys need to be looked at.
Derek Jeter has never hit over 24 homeruns in a season. He's been remarkably consistent over the years and has only missed more than 30 games in a season once. The introduction of testing has not decreased his performance or time out on the field. I haven't yet reached a point where I think someone with Jeter's numbers is taking roids.As I lead this army, make room for mistakes and depression
--Kendrick Lamar
Comment
-
-
-
It's good he's not getting paid. Giambi didn't have a steroids clause in his contract, in fact I think the mention of steroids was explicitly taken out. Of course, that contract was signed back in 2001 and not 2009.Originally posted by TripletDaddy View PostIt is. No player will have a clause that says that they still get paid if they are suspended for using PEDs. That is ridiculous. What team would agree to that? Why do you think the players union is so vigilant about obstructing testing and test results?Part of it is based on academic grounds. Among major conferences, the Pac-10 is the best academically, largely because of Stanford, Cal and UCLA. “Colorado is on a par with Oregon,” he said. “Utah isn’t even in the picture.”
Comment
-
BTW, has Canseco ever been wrong on the steroid accusations? He really is an oracle.Part of it is based on academic grounds. Among major conferences, the Pac-10 is the best academically, largely because of Stanford, Cal and UCLA. “Colorado is on a par with Oregon,” he said. “Utah isn’t even in the picture.”
Comment
Comment