Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2012 NFL Draft

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2012 NFL Draft

    The top 20 picks have been decided (sort of):

    1. Indianapolis Colts
    2. Washington Redskins
    3. Minnesota Vikings
    4. Cleveland Browns
    5. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
    6. St. Louis Rams
    7. Jacksonville Jaguars
    8. Miami Dolphins
    9. Carolina Panthers
    10. Buffalo Bills
    11. Kansas City Chiefs
    12. Seattle Seahawks
    13. Arizona Cardinals
    14. Dallas Cowboys
    15. Philadelphia Eagles
    16. New York Jets
    17. Cincinnati Bengals
    18. San Diego Chargers
    19. Chicago Bears
    20. Tennessee Titans
    21. Cincinnati Bengals
    22. Cleveland Browns
    23. Detroit Lions
    24. Pittsburgh Steelers
    25. Denver Broncos
    26. Houston Texans
    27. New England Patriots
    28. Green Bay Packers
    29. Baltimore Ravens
    30. San Francisco 49ers
    31. New England Patriots
    32. New York Giants

    *to be decided by a coin flip
    Last edited by DrumNFeather; 03-10-2012, 05:38 PM.
    "They're good. They've always been good" - David Shaw.

    Well, because he thought it was good sport. Because some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money. They can't be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.

  • #2
    Indy fired Bill Polian today. I can't help but think that it portends a complete break with the current regime and that means drafting Andrew Luck and trading Peyton Manning. I think it's the right move and not something that Polian would be willing to make. Also, I can't recall the Colts making a decent 1st round draft pick since Dwight Freeney, with the possible exception of the oft-injured Bob Sanders.
    Part of it is based on academic grounds. Among major conferences, the Pac-10 is the best academically, largely because of Stanford, Cal and UCLA. “Colorado is on a par with Oregon,” he said. “Utah isn’t even in the picture.”

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Color Me Badd Fan View Post
      Indy fired Bill Polian today. I can't help but think that it portends a complete break with the current regime and that means drafting Andrew Luck and trading Peyton Manning. I think it's the right move and not something that Polian would be willing to make. Also, I can't recall the Colts making a decent 1st round draft pick since Dwight Freeney, with the possible exception of the oft-injured Bob Sanders.
      Yeah that was an interesting move...and with Caldwell likely to get Sacked as well that entire organization is going to be turned on its head.

      It'll be interesting to see what the asking price is for Peyton if that's the direction they decide to go in.

      At the top of the draft, it's likely that 4 of the top 7 teams will have new coaches, so it'll be interesting to see how much buzz and interest RG III attracts from teams like St. Louis and Tampa, who already have young QBs in their stable.
      "They're good. They've always been good" - David Shaw.

      Well, because he thought it was good sport. Because some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money. They can't be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Color Me Badd Fan View Post
        Indy fired Bill Polian today. I can't help but think that it portends a complete break with the current regime and that means drafting Andrew Luck and trading Peyton Manning. I think it's the right move and not something that Polian would be willing to make. Also, I can't recall the Colts making a decent 1st round draft pick since Dwight Freeney, with the possible exception of the oft-injured Bob Sanders.
        Polian is one of the best executives in the NFL. He ran the Bill during their run in the early 90s, he ran Carolina during the first 3 years of existence when they made it to the NFC chamipionship and now look what he has done with Indy.

        Players Polian has drafted:

        Edgerrin James
        Reggie Wayne
        Peyton Manning
        Dwight Freeney
        Robert Mathis


        He has also discovered the following undrafted FA:

        Jeff Saturday
        Dominic Rhodes
        Terrence Wilkins
        Raheem Brock
        Gary Brackett
        Ben Utecht
        Ryan Lilja
        Melvin Bullitt


        Sorry but the guy is a witch in the front office and Indy is making a huge mistake.
        *Banned*

        Comment


        • #5
          Forgive me for being a non-follower of the NFL draft and no NFL expert. But it seems to me that the Colts would be much better off trading the pick if they can get back multiple 1st round and other picks. Luck is obviously not going to make them a good team in the next few years without a whole lotta help, right?

          So why is my thinking wrong? Is it because it is easy to acquire loads of talent via free agency, but not a good QB? Even if that is the case, if we look at the best QBs in the league right now, we see a bunch of guys (other than Peyton Manning) who were not top picks. Rogers, Brady, Brees.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Jacob View Post
            Forgive me for being a non-follower of the NFL draft and no NFL expert. But it seems to me that the Colts would be much better off trading the pick if they can get back multiple 1st round and other picks. Luck is obviously not going to make them a good team in the next few years without a whole lotta help, right?

            So why is my thinking wrong? Is it because it is easy to acquire loads of talent via free agency, but not a good QB? Even if that is the case, if we look at the best QBs in the league right now, we see a bunch of guys (other than Peyton Manning) who were not top picks. Rogers, Brady, Brees.
            I haven't followed them much, but it seemed like when Peyton went down they went from great to poor. Did they lose a bunch of other pieces at the same time?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by woot View Post
              I haven't followed them much, but it seemed like when Peyton went down they went from great to poor. Did they lose a bunch of other pieces at the same time?
              I guess they were 10-6 last year. But Luck isn't Manning, and if he ever is, it is several years away, at which time, Manning's team won't be around any more. I don't know what other personnel changes they had after last year. But it's hard to believe that a team goes from superbowl to 10-6 to 1-15 just because the QB got injured.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Jacob View Post
                Forgive me for being a non-follower of the NFL draft and no NFL expert. But it seems to me that the Colts would be much better off trading the pick if they can get back multiple 1st round and other picks. Luck is obviously not going to make them a good team in the next few years without a whole lotta help, right?

                So why is my thinking wrong? Is it because it is easy to acquire loads of talent via free agency, but not a good QB? Even if that is the case, if we look at the best QBs in the league right now, we see a bunch of guys (other than Peyton Manning) who were not top picks. Rogers, Brady, Brees.
                Connect the dots I've outlined for you.

                As for the QBs mentioned, Rogers and Brees were the 2nd QBs taken in their respective drafts (2005 and 2001). They're certainly top picks at their position. Brady is a huge outlier and really shouldn't be part of the discussion.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by cougjunkie View Post
                  Polian is one of the best executives in the NFL. He ran the Bill during their run in the early 90s, he ran Carolina during the first 3 years of existence when they made it to the NFC chamipionship and now look what he has done with Indy.

                  Players Polian has drafted:

                  Edgerrin James
                  Reggie Wayne
                  Peyton Manning
                  Dwight Freeney
                  Robert Mathis


                  He has also discovered the following undrafted FA:

                  Jeff Saturday
                  Dominic Rhodes
                  Terrence Wilkins
                  Raheem Brock
                  Gary Brackett
                  Ben Utecht
                  Ryan Lilja
                  Melvin Bullitt


                  Sorry but the guy is a witch in the front office and Indy is making a huge mistake.
                  His son is now involved and by all accounts he's an idiot. Also you're going back through something like 15 drafts. The Peyton Manning pick alone defines the era. Finally, the last 5-6 drafts have been terrible enough to produce a 2-14 team. Pittsburgh and New England have been drafting in the same spots and they went a combined 25-7.
                  Part of it is based on academic grounds. Among major conferences, the Pac-10 is the best academically, largely because of Stanford, Cal and UCLA. “Colorado is on a par with Oregon,” he said. “Utah isn’t even in the picture.”

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Jacob View Post
                    Forgive me for being a non-follower of the NFL draft and no NFL expert. But it seems to me that the Colts would be much better off trading the pick if they can get back multiple 1st round and other picks. Luck is obviously not going to make them a good team in the next few years without a whole lotta help, right?

                    So why is my thinking wrong? Is it because it is easy to acquire loads of talent via free agency, but not a good QB? Even if that is the case, if we look at the best QBs in the league right now, we see a bunch of guys (other than Peyton Manning) who were not top picks. Rogers, Brady, Brees.
                    The Packers selected Rogers when Favre was about the same age as Manning is right now. The Packers as a result will end up with something like 25 straight years of good to great QB play (if you ignore a couple of the shitty Favre years). Correspondingly, the Packers will be relevant for a large percentage of those years.

                    The Colts now have the same opportunity and they shouldn't screw it up.
                    Part of it is based on academic grounds. Among major conferences, the Pac-10 is the best academically, largely because of Stanford, Cal and UCLA. “Colorado is on a par with Oregon,” he said. “Utah isn’t even in the picture.”

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      St. Louis will Trade the #2 pick...the question is, to whom?

                      Cleveland and Washington are the frontrunners. Cleveland has more immediate fire power, but Washington is likely willing to give up more to get up to 2 to get RGIII.

                      Miami and Seattle could be players in this as well.

                      It behooves the rams to make a move before free agency starts and the crop of teams looking at RGIII thins out...but if they can keep two teams bidding, they could potentially score 3 number 1 picks for their pick.

                      When the Giants traded for Eli, they traded two firsts a 3rd and a 5th. Whatever the price the Rams end up demanding, this trade will be unprecidented.

                      Personally, I think the Skins need to do whatever it takes to get him, because if they don't and then can't move down, I think they'll end up taking Tannehill at 6.
                      "They're good. They've always been good" - David Shaw.

                      Well, because he thought it was good sport. Because some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money. They can't be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by DrumNFeather View Post
                        St. Louis will Trade the #2 pick...the question is, to whom?

                        Cleveland and Washington are the frontrunners. Cleveland has more immediate fire power, but Washington is likely willing to give up more to get up to 2 to get RGIII.

                        Miami and Seattle could be players in this as well.

                        It behooves the rams to make a move before free agency starts and the crop of teams looking at RGIII thins out...but if they can keep two teams bidding, they could potentially score 3 number 1 picks for their pick.

                        When the Giants traded for Eli, they traded two firsts a 3rd and a 5th. Whatever the price the Rams end up demanding, this trade will be unprecidented.

                        Personally, I think the Skins need to do whatever it takes to get him, because if they don't and then can't move down, I think they'll end up taking Tannehill at 6.
                        FYI, I read about rumors of a trade involving Denver, Jacksonville and Cleveland which would land Tebow in Jacksonville along with, Cleveland some extra draft picks and a move down to 7, and Denver with Cleveland's No 4 pick, which they would then package with some picks and players to Move up to No. 2.

                        As a Denver fan, I'd love to get Griffin, but they need all the picks they can get to help their defense (which was significantly overrated, despite all the claims that the D carried them down the stretch).
                        Prepare to put mustard on those words, for you will soon be consuming them, along with this slice of humble pie that comes direct from the oven of shame set at gas mark “egg on your face”! -- Moss

                        There's three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who's got the same first name as a city; and never go near a lady's got a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, everything else is cream cheese. --Coach Finstock

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by DrumNFeather View Post
                          St. Louis will Trade the #2 pick...the question is, to whom?

                          Cleveland and Washington are the frontrunners. Cleveland has more immediate fire power, but Washington is likely willing to give up more to get up to 2 to get RGIII.

                          Miami and Seattle could be players in this as well.

                          It behooves the rams to make a move before free agency starts and the crop of teams looking at RGIII thins out...but if they can keep two teams bidding, they could potentially score 3 number 1 picks for their pick.

                          When the Giants traded for Eli, they traded two firsts a 3rd and a 5th. Whatever the price the Rams end up demanding, this trade will be unprecidented.

                          Personally, I think the Skins need to do whatever it takes to get him, because if they don't and then can't move down, I think they'll end up taking Tannehill at 6.
                          I watched a brief interview Mooch did with RGIII on NFL network yesterday. He comes across as very bright with a good grasp of the QB position. I thought he was really impressive. With his athleticism and intelligence, he's going to make some team really happy.
                          If we disagree on something, it's because you're wrong.

                          "Somebody needs to kill my trial attorney." — Last words of George Harris, executed in Missouri on Sept. 13, 2000.

                          "Nothing is too good to be true, nothing is too good to last, nothing is too wonderful to happen." - Florence Scoville Shinn

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by DrumNFeather View Post
                            St. Louis will Trade the #2 pick...the question is, to whom?

                            Cleveland and Washington are the frontrunners. Cleveland has more immediate fire power, but Washington is likely willing to give up more to get up to 2 to get RGIII.

                            Miami and Seattle could be players in this as well.

                            It behooves the rams to make a move before free agency starts and the crop of teams looking at RGIII thins out...but if they can keep two teams bidding, they could potentially score 3 number 1 picks for their pick.

                            When the Giants traded for Eli, they traded two firsts a 3rd and a 5th. Whatever the price the Rams end up demanding, this trade will be unprecidented.

                            Personally, I think the Skins need to do whatever it takes to get him, because if they don't and then can't move down, I think they'll end up taking Tannehill at 6.
                            You know I have been a big fan of how conservative the Skins have been in recent years but I do think there is a time for pushing all your chips to the middle of the table. This seems like one of those moments to me.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by UtahDan View Post
                              You know I have been a big fan of how conservative the Skins have been in recent years but I do think there is a time for pushing all your chips to the middle of the table. This seems like one of those moments to me.
                              still sad that Beck didn't work out.
                              Dio perdona tante cose per un’opera di misericordia
                              God forgives many things for an act of mercy
                              Alessandro Manzoni

                              Knock it off. This board has enough problems without a dose of middle-age lechery.

                              pelagius

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X