NCAA Tourney Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • smokymountainrain
    Impressive Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 22593

    #16
    Originally posted by cougjunkie View Post
    It looks like his run through the SEC tournament helped him quite a bit. He shot over 40% in all 6 games and is now up to 38% on the year and 34% from three. That is still not very good considering the volume of shots he takes.
    Right. 38% is still terrible for a guy getting 20+ ppg.
    I'm like LeBron James.
    -mpfunk

    Comment

    • FN Phat
      I ♥ gateway sex
      • Feb 2009
      • 8691

      #17
      That isn't too bad considering he has to get past the defender and his ego.
      I'm your huckleberry.


      "I love pulling the bone. Really though, what guy doesn't?" - CJF

      Comment

      • Flystripper
        Degenerate Gambler
        • Nov 2008
        • 14112

        #18
        Originally posted by Surfah View Post
        This is hilarious. The SEC coaches are upset their conference only got 3 bids. Marshall Henderson was right, the SEC coaches are losers. I hope Ole Miss goes on a run just so I can watch that d-bag. I still want to punch him all the time, but the dude is hilarious. And since he's no longer in a Utah uniform I find his antics hilarious. That dude knows how to piss off a crowd and get in his opponents heads.
        I want him in as long as possible, but it will be fun to see the meltdown when he loses.. The longer he is in the worse the meltdown will be.
        Dyslexics are teople poo...

        Comment

        • PaloAltoCougar
          Semper infra dignitatem
          • Nov 2008
          • 16943

          #19
          I'm sure I've simply missed the explanation, but I don't understand why the first round games involve teams seeded higher than 16. I assume it's because they take a combination of the lowest of the conference champs and the lowest of the at large selections, but why? Wouldn't it be better to be a 12-seed and play your first game (albeit against a tougher opponent) in the second round, than be an 11-seed and face an equally low seed in round one, followed by a slightly easier opponent in round two?

          Comment

          • YOhio
            Hipster Mode
            • Nov 2008
            • 26165

            #20
            Originally posted by PaloAltoCougar View Post
            I'm sure I've simply missed the explanation, but I don't understand why the first round games involve teams seeded higher than 16. I assume it's because they take a combination of the lowest of the conference champs and the lowest of the at large selections, but why? Wouldn't it be better to be a 12-seed and play your first game (albeit against a tougher opponent) in the second round, than be an 11-seed and face an equally low seed in round one, followed by a slightly easier opponent in round two?
            Bro. No matter how good a team is they can't turn down the chance to visit Dayton. It's a reward of sorts.

            Comment

            • PaloAltoCougar
              Semper infra dignitatem
              • Nov 2008
              • 16943

              #21
              Originally posted by YOhio View Post
              Bro. No matter how good a team is they can't turn down the chance to visit Dayton. It's a reward of sorts.
              Totally missed the venue bonus. I understand now.

              Comment

              • HuskyFreeNorthwest
                Time to camp
                • Nov 2008
                • 26082

                #22
                Originally posted by PaloAltoCougar View Post
                I'm sure I've simply missed the explanation, but I don't understand why the first round games involve teams seeded higher than 16. I assume it's because they take a combination of the lowest of the conference champs and the lowest of the at large selections, but why? Wouldn't it be better to be a 12-seed and play your first game (albeit against a tougher opponent) in the second round, than be an 11-seed and face an equally low seed in round one, followed by a slightly easier opponent in round two?
                I always feel like the play in games should be the last 8 at large bids, the 16 seeds that win the small conferences shouldn't have to win again go get there IMO.
                Get confident, stupid
                -landpoke

                Comment

                • CardiacCoug
                  вот так штука
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 11013

                  #23
                  Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View Post
                  I always feel like the play in games should be the last 8 at large bids, the 16 seeds that win the small conferences shouldn't have to win again go get there IMO.
                  I agree. All the 16 seeds should get a shot at Goliath.

                  Comment

                  • PaloAltoCougar
                    Semper infra dignitatem
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 16943

                    #24
                    Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View Post
                    I always feel like the play in games should be the last 8 at large bids, the 16 seeds that win the small conferences shouldn't have to win again go get there IMO.
                    That makes more sense than the weird combo approach they take now.

                    Comment

                    • CardiacCoug
                      вот так штука
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 11013

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Surfah View Post
                      This is hilarious. The SEC coaches are upset their conference only got 3 bids. Marshall Henderson was right, the SEC coaches are losers. I hope Ole Miss goes on a run just so I can watch that d-bag. I still want to punch him all the time, but the dude is hilarious. And since he's no longer in a Utah uniform I find his antics hilarious. That dude knows how to piss off a crowd and get in his opponents heads.



                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]1940[/ATTACH]
                      Kentucky proves tonight that the SEC actually was awesome this season.

                      Comment

                      • il Padrino Ute
                        Junior Member
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 19161

                        #26
                        Originally posted by CardiacCoug View Post
                        Kentucky proves tonight that the SEC actually was awesome this season.
                        No doubt. That Calipari couldn't win a game in his high school gym says a lot about how overrated the SEC was this year.
                        "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill


                        "I only know what I hear on the news." - Dear Leader

                        Comment

                        • bluegoose
                          7th round draft pick
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 4121

                          #27
                          Here is a cool little tourney predictor, giving the likelihood of each team winning their potential games, from the play-in games through the NC game.

                          Not sure where they get the data or how well it compares to other models, but it is interesting either way.

                          Comment

                          • HuskyFreeNorthwest
                            Time to camp
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 26082

                            #28
                            Originally posted by bluegoose View Post
                            Here is a cool little tourney predictor, giving the likelihood of each team winning their potential games, from the play-in games through the NC game.

                            Not sure where they get the data or how well it compares to other models, but it is interesting either way.

                            http://thepowerrank.com/visual/NCAA_...nt_Predictions
                            I'll be checking that out this evening, nice find. My preliminary run through has Louisville winning, I didn't like the pick when I filled it out, like it even less seeing how trendy the Cards are nationally.
                            Get confident, stupid
                            -landpoke

                            Comment

                            • bluegoose
                              7th round draft pick
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 4121

                              #29
                              KenPom saying that Florida has the lowest chance of not winning. More clearly stated, I have no idea what he is trying to say with his explanation above the data of what those numbers mean.

                              http://kenpom.com/blog/index.php/web...ournament_log5

                              Comment

                              • The_Douger
                                Athletic Supporter
                                • Jun 2012
                                • 5413

                                #30
                                Boise looks like they're going down to LaSalle after allowing a blistering 63% shooting night. Impossible to win if you do that.
                                Will donate kidney for B12 membership.

                                Comment

                                Working...