I find all of the posts (not necessarily here) on Boylen's anger "issues" to be kind of funny. I really have not seen a whole lot from Boylen in terms of antics that really bothers me. It looks to me like he is just an intense guy who wants his team to be better than they really are.
I can't help but get the sense that those that really complain about his antics have never really played competitive sports, and don't understand that you can get angry playing or coaching any sport.
Several years ago, when Matt Daugherty was losing at UNC, the comment was made that if he was winning, all his yelling and hooting and hollaring at the players would mean that he was a good motivator. When you are losing your just a loon who is yelling and screaming on the sidelines.
This may be fan spin, but personally, I'd rather have a coach that gets pissed at losing rather than one that is just perfectly okay with losing.
I can't help but get the sense that those that really complain about his antics have never really played competitive sports, and don't understand that you can get angry playing or coaching any sport.
Several years ago, when Matt Daugherty was losing at UNC, the comment was made that if he was winning, all his yelling and hooting and hollaring at the players would mean that he was a good motivator. When you are losing your just a loon who is yelling and screaming on the sidelines.
This may be fan spin, but personally, I'd rather have a coach that gets pissed at losing rather than one that is just perfectly okay with losing.
Comment