Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Impeaching Trump: Make America Sane Again

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • myboynoah
    replied
    The fact that the whistleblower produced a fairly comprehensive and detailed complaint to the Intelligence IG shouldn’t alarm anyone with experience in the intelligence community. In fact, it speaks to the credibility of the whistleblower and authenticity of his/her claim. Producing understandable and actionable intelligence for policymakers is his/her job (I assume since reports are that he/she is from the CIA and worked at the White House on the National Security Council). The goal of an intelligence analyst is to provide as thorough of an assessment as possible of a situation from the information available (all of it second hand). He/she must cross check reporting with that coming from other sources. U.S. policy and credibility depends on this level of thoroughness and scrutiny. It is then no surprise that he/she would use that same tradecraft and approach when drafting a whistleblower complaint. Indeed, it would be suspicious and damage his/her credibility if he/she didn’t do that.

    And WTH? In the end, the whistleblower's complaint was confirmed.

    This whole disinformation effort to attack the credibility of the whistleblower is organized and run out of Trump’s re-election campaign “Death Star” operation located in Rosslyn, Virginia. These people loyally follow the lead of their boss and lie with abandon.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bo Diddley
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
    That was well played by pelado.
    pelado is a national treasure.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Lebowski
    replied
    Originally posted by Katy Lied View Post
    I think he means Pelado throwing shade on Lebowski
    That was well played by pelado.

    Leave a comment:


  • Katy Lied
    replied
    I think he means Pelado throwing shade on Lebowski

    Leave a comment:


  • frank ryan
    replied
    Originally posted by beefytee View Post
    You mean LA Ute throwing shade on the whistleblower?
    I think he means LaUte turncoating from being a leading Romney champion to casting doubt on Emperor Trump’s accuser.

    Leave a comment:


  • beefytee
    replied
    Originally posted by myboynoah View Post
    This turn is not at all surprising.
    You mean LA Ute throwing shade on the whistleblower?

    Leave a comment:


  • myboynoah
    replied
    This turn is not at all surprising.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pelado
    replied
    Originally posted by LA Ute View Post
    You can come up with a more thoughtful response than that.
    What makes you think that?

    Leave a comment:


  • LA Ute
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
    Have you ever had a whistleblower submit a report that would potentially bring down a US president? Come on.
    You can come up with a more thoughtful response than that.

    Leave a comment:


  • YOhio
    replied
    Originally posted by LA Ute View Post
    Whistleblowers are a big part of my professional life. I’ve never seen any whistleblower submit the equivalent of a carefully-drafted and reasoned legal brief supporting his or her claims about a second-hand account of wrongdoing. Whether one likes Trump or not (and I don’t), that part of this saga is just odd.
    Lol. You working with a bunch of tattletales surprises me zero.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Lebowski
    replied
    Originally posted by LA Ute View Post
    Whistleblowers are a big part of my professional life. I’ve never seen any whistleblower submit the equivalent of a carefully-drafted and reasoned legal brief supporting his or her claims about a second-hand account of wrongdoing. Whether one likes Trump or not (and I don’t), that part of this saga is just odd.
    Have you ever had a whistleblower submit a report that would potentially bring down a US president? Come on.

    Leave a comment:


  • LA Ute
    replied
    Originally posted by creekster View Post
    In his role as whistelblower you are, of course, correct. In his role as a witness, either voluntarily or involuntarily through use of his whistleblower statement, his (or her) bias is relevant.
    Whistleblowers are a big part of my professional life. I’ve never seen any whistleblower submit the equivalent of a carefully-drafted and reasoned legal brief supporting his or her claims about a second-hand account of wrongdoing. Whether one likes Trump or not (and I don’t), that part of this saga is just odd.

    Leave a comment:


  • myboynoah
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Uncle Ted
    replied
    Originally posted by myboynoah View Post
    Given this and the senate beginning to investigate Hunter "el whore chasing crackhead" Biden it sounds like the GOP'ers are going on the offense.



    P.S. Maybe they should investigate Pelosi as well... This is an oldie but a goodie:

    Last edited by Uncle Ted; 02-08-2020, 10:28 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • LVAllen
    replied
    Originally posted by myboynoah View Post
    Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman is going back to the Pentagon.
    Lt. Col. Yevgeny Vindman, counsel to the NSC, is going to the Office of General Counsel at the Pentagon.
    Former Ambassador Gordon Sondland is getting off this crazy train.
    Acting CoS Mick Mulvaney is going to Hell, date TBA.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X