The 2016 Presidential Election Trainwreck

[I.J. Reilly]

I hear Trump go off on the govenor from New Mexico and I think, ok that's it I am voting for Hillary. However, the Supreme Court and Hillary being supported by one of the biggest bitches in the world, Lizzy Warren brings me back to Trump. No, I am not voting for a libertarian. I could sit on my butt at home and watch TV and have the same effect.

Wow, she must have really left a mess after she murdered all of your family. I get why you would talk about her with such rage.

[byu71]

Wow, she must have really left a mess after she murdered all of your family. I get why you would talk about her with such rage.

I get the humor. Of course if I had the personality of some on here I would have to mock you and indicate you meant Lizzy Borden.

[Applejack]

I get the humor. Of course if I had the personality of some on here I would have to mock you and indicate you meant Lizzy Borden.

I doubt it. Most on here are too young to remember Lizzy Borden.

[Topper]

Der Donald isn't a big freedom guy. He is authoritarian.

He makes me puke but the NRA is backing my him. I do not wish to kiss the 2d Amendment goodbye without a battle. Hillary is making war on liberties en masse.

Can you imagine how much more spying on private citizens will increase give her Nixonian on steroids paranoia?

[byu71]

I doubt it. Most on here are too young to remember Lizzy Borden.

She wasn't bad looking. We dated a few times. I just didn't like her personality.

[Topper]

She wasn't bad looking. We dated a few times. I just didn't like her personality.

She just used you for your body.

[byu71]

She just used you for your body.

She wasn't the only one. That is why my body is used up now.

[Topper]

For those GOP voters who defy description and vote for Hillary?

How do you justify what she will do to the Supreme Court?
Have you noticed that she has declared war on the Second Amendment and determined in her infinite wisdom that Heller was decided incorrectly? She is determined by Court stacking to overturn Heller. Is the Second Amendment of no import to you?

[Northwestcoug]

LOL, once again, to those voters who will vote for Trump solely on the fear that Hillary will nominate worse Supreme Court justices. As if you couldn't do a one minute google search and find Trump statements for gun control that basically align with mainstream democratic opinion. Or find a handful of statements from this year on how he feels about the press. Where is the evidence that you can confidently vote for him to nominate sane justices that will reliably have conservative opinions? LOL.

I understand those who can't vote for Hillary. A vote for third party is an honorable thing. A vote for Trump based solely on a hope that he will be less worse than her, just because he will have a (R) next to his name come election day, is wishful thinking at best.

But a strategic vote for Hillary, in the hopes that it will send the GOP a clear message to get it's act together, is the smart vote. Hillary 2016!!!

[frank ryan]

He makes me puke but the NRA is backing my him. I do not wish to kiss the 2d Amendment goodbye without a battle. Hillary is making war on liberties en masse.

Can you imagine how much more spying on private citizens will increase give her Nixonian on steroids paranoia?

The second amendment didn't go anywhere with Obama and it isn't going anywhere with Hillary, so relax.

[Maximus]

For those GOP voters who defy description and vote for Hillary?

How do you justify what she will do to the Supreme Court?
Have you noticed that she has declared war on the Second Amendment and determined in her infinite wisdom that Heller was decided incorrectly? She is determined by Court stacking to overturn Heller. Is the Second Amendment of no import to you?

NeverTrump
NeverHillary

[Applejack]

For those GOP voters who defy description and vote for Hillary?

How do you justify what she will do to the Supreme Court?
Have you noticed that she has declared war on the Second Amendment and determined in her infinite wisdom that Heller was decided incorrectly? She is determined by Court stacking to overturn Heller. Is the Second Amendment of no import to you?

LOL. Never change, topper.

[creekster]

LOL, once again, to those voters who will vote for Trump solely on the fear that Hillary will nominate worse Supreme Court justices. As if you couldn't do a one minute google search and find Trump statements for gun control that basically align with mainstream democratic opinion. Or find a handful of statements from this year on how he feels about the press. Where is the evidence that you can confidently vote for him to nominate sane justices that will reliably have conservative opinions? LOL.

I understand those who can't vote for Hillary. A vote for third party is an honorable thing. A vote for Trump based solely on a hope that he will be less worse than her, just because he will have a (R) next to his name come election day, is wishful thinking at best.

But a strategic vote for Hillary, in the hopes that it will send the GOP a clear message to get it's act together, is the smart vote. Hillary 2016!!!

Look, I can not stand Trump, but at least he has produced a list of potential court nominees. They do not share his idiocy. Hilary has not produced a similar list, although she has talked about a couple of names. Her potential candidates do not share her brand of corruption, afaik.

[I.J. Reilly]

Look, I can not stand Trump, but at least he has produced a list of potential court nominees. They do not share his idiocy. Hilary has not produced a similar list, although she has talked about a couple of names. Her potential candidates do not share her brand of corruption, afaik.

After which he promptly stated that there are probably a few more names he would add to the list. That anyone would place faith in such a list from Trump is beyond me.

[creekster]

After which he promptly stated that there are probably a few more names he would add to the list. That anyone would place faith in such a list from Trump is beyond me.

Faith? Do you have faith in Hilary's list? Oh, wait, it doesn't exist. Trump just said he wasn't limited to that list. That doesn't offend me (although most of what he says does offend me). but it is far from a mater of faith. It's a data point. I do think it is more likely that I would like Trump's nominees more than Hilary's nominees and the list affects the probabilities.