The 2016 Presidential Election Trainwreck
Collapse
X
-
"There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
-
You give the Clinton's way too much credit. During her entire tenure as SoS other intel agencies from other countries read her private unsecured email while our own government was in the dark. She "reset" the relationship with Russia and in short order they expanded the map, returning after a two decade hiatus to become our primary geopolitical foe. It's difficult to identify a nation with whom we had a better relationship in 2012 than in 2008. China? No. India? No. Russia? No. Her family foundation reeks of 'pay to play' schemes during her tenure as SoS. Her team gives Nixon a run for his money in paranoia by deleting public records and stealing classified docs from the National Archives. She refuses to engage the press and I predict she won't do more than one debate with Trump, if any at all.Originally posted by Northwestcoug View PostYou do have a knack for impressive hyperbole, I'll give you that.
But I'll play along. If I had two murderous dictators for choices, I suppose I'd pick the one who at least governs with a pretense for rule of law, and tries to maintain a respectable reputation for other countries.
However, let's get serious with our analogies. I do not think it's a stretch to say that given how Trump has campaigned this last year, he would have a lot of Putin-like tendencies if given the chance. Hillary? I'd say she'd govern more like Bill Clinton. I'll take a presidency that has ethical failings but governs respectfully over a reactionary populist one, thank you very much.
I'd accept that you like Hillary because of her crazy hawtt!! sex appeal but that's about it.
Comment
-
I thought I had been discreet with my pantsuit fetish around hereOriginally posted by YOhio View PostI'd accept that you like Hillary because of her crazy hawtt!! sex appeal but that's about it.
"...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
Comment
-
"...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
Comment
-
Haha.....you act like your one vote is anything more than a throw-away vote to begin with.Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View PostWriting in Mitt sounds like a super cool and satisfying thing to do, but it is a throw-away vote. I would rather do what little I can to help prevent a Trump presidency.
Comment
-
I am really unsure which party you speak of here. It applies equally to both.Originally posted by Northwestcoug View PostA bajillion times? Nah. I'll feel depressed pulling the lever for Hillary, and it may last for a time. But part of that depression is also caused by the absolute joke of a party that could do nothing to stop a despicable person from becoming an even more despicable presidential candidate. My hope will be that by supporting Hillary temporarily, the GOP will transform itself into a legitimate party. It has a very long way to go. And considering the sorry state of the democratic party, that really is saying something.
Comment
-
Let me be clear then. It applies more to the republican party.Originally posted by imanihonjin View PostI am really unsure which party you speak of here. It applies equally to both."...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
Comment
-
LOL, I love when you post comments claiming you are not a progressive liberal. Own it. It isn't that bad.Originally posted by Northwestcoug View PostLet me be clear then. It applies more to the republican party.
Yes JL, you have my permission to add, progessive liberals aren't that bad to the out of context quote that socialism isn't bad, IMHO.
Comment
-
I just checked myself, and no, I don't believe I'm wrong.Originally posted by YOhio View PostOMG you're so wrong!
LOL, is that all it takes? A progressive liberal is someone who can look at the state of each party and realize the GOP is in worse shape than the democrats? OK then, I guess I better proudly let my progressive flag fly.Originally posted by byu71 View PostLOL, I love when you post comments claiming you are not a progressive liberal. Own it. It isn't that bad.
Yes JL, you have my permission to add, progessive liberals aren't that bad to the out of context quote that socialism isn't bad, IMHO."...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
Comment
-
UH, I would never claim someone "appears" to be liberal, conservative, dumb, smart, etc. of off one quote. It is your body of work.Originally posted by Northwestcoug View PostI just checked myself, and no, I don't believe I'm wrong.
LOL, is that all it takes? A progressive liberal is someone who can look at the state of each party and realize the GOP is in worse shape than the democrats? OK then, I guess I better proudly let my progressive flag fly.
Lest anyone get the wrong idea since I lean conservative, my comment in no way should be taken that I don't love to hear your opinions. You have always been kind and considerate to me and I appreciate it.
I can honestly say you and Frank are two progressives I like a lot.
Comment
-
Group hug!Originally posted by byu71 View PostUH, I would never claim someone "appears" to be liberal, conservative, dumb, smart, etc. of off one quote. It is your body of work.
Lest anyone get the wrong idea since I lean conservative, my comment in no way should be taken that I don't love to hear your opinions. You have always been kind and considerate to me and I appreciate it.
I can honestly say you and Frank are two progressives I like a lot.
We all trust our own unorthodoxies.
Comment
-
Spare me your outreach. Us progressive liberals loathe conservatives like youOriginally posted by byu71 View PostUH, I would never claim someone "appears" to be liberal, conservative, dumb, smart, etc. of off one quote. It is your body of work.
Lest anyone get the wrong idea since I lean conservative, my comment in no way should be taken that I don't love to hear your opinions. You have always been kind and considerate to me and I appreciate it.
I can honestly say you and Frank are two progressives I like a lot.
"...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
Comment
-
Comment
-
Thank you. I appreciate your vote.Originally posted by Bo Diddley View PostI've decided that I'm going to vote for the candidate most likely to unify our country."Guitar groups are on their way out, Mr Epstein."
Upon rejecting the Beatles, Dick Rowe told Brian Epstein of the January 1, 1962 audition for Decca, which signed Brian Poole and the Tremeloes instead.
Comment
Comment