Originally posted by ERCougar
View Post
The Obama v. Romney Debate Thread, Part II
Collapse
X
-
As usual, The Onion grasps the true nature of the situation...
Nation Tunes In To See Which Sociopath More Likable This Time
Comment
-
It's an inside joke with some of us.Originally posted by LA Ute View PostAre you following MMA a lot these days? Your repeated references to cage matches are starting to worry meWhen a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
--Jonathan Swift
Comment
-
-
I wondered who started the applause during the debate last night and saw that is was a woman in a purple dress but didn't think much of it until now..
Looks like that person was in fact Michelle Obama herself..
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...at_debate.html
Comment
-
Rules, shmools.Originally posted by dabrockster View PostI wondered who started the applause during the debate last night and saw that is was a woman in a purple dress but didn't think much of it until now..
Looks like that person was in fact Michelle Obama herself..
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...at_debate.html
Comment
-
Yep.Originally posted by U-Ute View PostAs usual, The Onion grasps the true nature of the situation...
Nation Tunes In To See Which Sociopath More Likable This Time"If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
I like how in the CBS poll where Obama wins over all and only really won "Likeability" with any margin. I wonder how the "Likeability" question was phrased. Maybe something like:Originally posted by Tex View PostI've said this a couple of times over the years, it doesn't matter who "wins," it matters what they do for their ticket. Hard for me to see how last night makes much change to what Romney did in Denver.
Also note: the evening was spent on Romney's messaging. Obama said precious little about a 2nd term, and the debate was all about Romney's positions and Obama's record. How does that help Obama persuade anyone?
Lastly, even polls showing Obama "winning" the debate have disastrous numbers for him on specific issues:
These are not numbers an incumbent wins with.CNN poll
Who won: 46 O / 39 R
Best on economy: 58 R / 40 O
Best on health care: 49 R / 46 O
Best on taxes: 51 R / 44 O
Best on deficit: 59 R / 36 O
Best on foreign policy: 49 O / 47 R
Partisan split: 33 R / 33 D
CBS poll
Who won: 37 O / 30 R / 33 Tie
Best on economy: 65 R / 34 R
Stronger leader: 46 R / 46 O
Likeability: 47 O / 41 R
Does Romney have a clear plan? 49 Yes / 50 No
Does Obama have a clear plan? 38 Yes / 61 No
Partisan split: 21 R / 23 D / 56 unaffiliated
"Who would you rather sit down and have a beer with? Obama or Rmoney? Keep in mind that Rmoney is mormon and, therefore, wouldn't drink a beer but would instead sit there and watch you drink yours like some creepy missionary in white shirt and tie that wants to give yet another Book of Mormon.""If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
The debate is being replayed on CNN and while I was doing stuff around the house (ok...on CUF), I caught the President's closing statement. I noticed that as soon as he started talking about the 47%, the "approval line" flatlined. I'm not sure if that means much, but I didn't think the comment was a big deal then and I still don't think it is, and I think that shows it. The reason: a lot of the 47% don't think they're the 47%. Check out CB as exhibit 1. I'm guessing very few of these people realize that they don't pay taxes and that they're huge beneficiaries of government handouts and credits, yet they'll get perfectly indignant about those who are getting these. They don't think Romney is talking about them.At least the Big Ten went after a big-time addition in Nebraska; the Pac-10 wanted a game so badly, it added Utah
-Berry Trammel, 12/3/10
Comment
-
Truthfully, he isn't.Originally posted by ERCougar View PostThe debate is being replayed on CNN and while I was doing stuff around the house (ok...on CUF), I caught the President's closing statement. I noticed that as soon as he started talking about the 47%, the "approval line" flatlined. I'm not sure if that means much, but I didn't think the comment was a big deal then and I still don't think it is, and I think that shows it. The reason: a lot of the 47% don't think they're the 47%. Check out CB as exhibit 1. I'm guessing very few of these people realize that they don't pay taxes and that they're huge beneficiaries of government handouts and credits, yet they'll get perfectly indignant about those who are getting these. They don't think Romney is talking about them.Dio perdona tante cose per un’opera di misericordia
God forgives many things for an act of mercyAlessandro Manzoni
Knock it off. This board has enough problems without a dose of middle-age lechery.
pelagius
Comment
-
Well, yes and no.Originally posted by pellegrino View PostTruthfully, he isn't.
If we're referring to those he says that are dependent on the government and don't want to lose the handout and will vote Obama no matter what, then no, they obviously aren't part of that crowd. But Democrats are trying to expand that 47% to all sorts of normal people, and in reality, they're right--the 47% who don't pay federal taxes include all sorts of normal, hard-working people. The problem with that strategy is that these 47% don't know who they are, and most people are suspicious of the other guy getting a free ride while quite oblivious to their own. They'll jump right on board with getting angry at "those guys". Thus, the Democratic strategy just doesn't work.At least the Big Ten went after a big-time addition in Nebraska; the Pac-10 wanted a game so badly, it added Utah
-Berry Trammel, 12/3/10
Comment
-
This is sad, embarrassing and funny all at once:
[YOUTUBE]9UrOmhH2PeI#![/YOUTUBE]“There is a great deal of difference in believing something still, and believing it again.”
― W.H. Auden
"God made the angels to show His splendour - as He made animals for innocence and plants for their simplicity. But men and women He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of their minds."
-- Robert Bolt, A Man for All Seasons
"It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
--Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Comment
Comment