Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eat up, you godless Sodomites!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why in the holy name of Sam Houston would any intelligent business owner take any political stand publicly that is not directly related to his or her business? Look, talk about your views all you want with friends and such, but when you have the media in your grill the right answer has to be "we just want to make tasty chicken sandwiches.". Unless, perhaps, you have a directive to piss off large sections of your potential customer base.

    Maybe they were just trying to galvanize themselves as the fast food of choice for open bigots?
    Awesomeness now has a name. Let me introduce myself.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by nikuman View Post
      Why in the holy name of Sam Houston would any intelligent business owner take any political stand publicly that is not directly related to his or her business? Look, talk about your views all you want with friends and such, but when you have the media in your grill the right answer has to be "we just want to make tasty chicken sandwiches.". Unless, perhaps, you have a directive to piss off large sections of your potential customer base.

      Maybe they were just trying to galvanize themselves as the fast food of choice for open bigots?
      Yep. What was it that Michael Jordan said? Something like "Republicans buy shoes too."

      Comment


      • Originally posted by frank ryan View Post
        What the hell are they thinking doing selling their "food" to French people sounds like a disaster. Can you imagine both the service and the complaints?
        In France, you can buy beer with your Big Mac.
        "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

        Comment


        • Originally posted by nikuman View Post
          Why in the holy name of Sam Houston would any intelligent business owner take any political stand publicly that is not directly related to his or her business?
          To increase sales?


          "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Moliere View Post
            To increase sales?
            Well, I am hoping this crowd will clear out on Friday (because of the GLAAD National Same-Sex Kiss day being conveniently held at Chick-Fil-A) so I can get a spicy chicken sandwich without waiting an hour.
            "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
            "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
            "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
            GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

            Comment


            • Cathy could say Mormonism is a cult and want the extermination order reenacted and I'd still eat there. Especially at Christmas time when the peppermint chocolate chip shake is for sale.
              "Nobody listens to Turtle."
              -Turtle
              sigpic

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Surfah View Post
                Cathy could say Mormonism is a cult and want the extermination order reenacted and I'd still eat there. Especially at Christmas time when the peppermint chocolate chip shake is for sale.
                It is Mr. Cathy to you

                Comment


                • Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
                  To paraphrase SeattleUte, this isn't an interesting topic anymore. And thats all I'm going to say on this matter!
                  Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
                  this summation of the issue is a common one. It is an entirely inaccurate summation, but it a common one, nonetheless.

                  On the news tonight, the reporter interviewed a woman in line at CFA and she said she was there to "support CFAs right to express its opinion." I truly believe that she was in the line thinking that CFAs right to express its opinion was at issue. Mission accomplished, woman in line at CFA!
                  ??????

                  Originally posted by YOhio View Post
                  France is McDonalds' number 2 market.
                  Well duh - they have French Fries on the menu.
                  "I think it was King Benjamin who said 'you sorry ass shitbags who have no skills that the market values also have an obligation to have the attitude that if one day you do in fact win the PowerBall Lottery that you will then impart of your substance to those without.'"
                  - Goatnapper'96

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by myboynoah View Post
                    How is it that government officials threatening the free enterprise of an individual's business because of something that individual said is not at least close to being a violation of the First Amendment?

                    I concede that there may be some technical reasons as to why this isn't a violation, but clearly these government officials are trying to control speech.
                    From what I have read, the mayors are using zoning to justify their positions and I believe the Boston mayor backed down on that front but the Chicago mayor has not. This is the same logic used to keep adult-oriented businesses and all but a tiny handful of bars out of Utah County. Nobody seems to have a problem with it in those cases. But yes, you got me there. I think the mayors are wrong. Yet, I have seen very few people focus on that. Most of the discussion I have seen has been in response to overall criticism of CFA and talk of a boycott. I am surprised how many people think that any kind of criticism or backlash to perceived bigotry is an infringement of free speech. I suppose they are taking their cue from Sarah Palin:

                    "I don't know what the future of our country would be in terms of First Amendment rights and our ability to ask questions without fear of attacks by the mainstream media."
                    And by the way, this is not just a gay marriage issue. From what I understand, CFA donates heavily to groups that work to reinstate the ban on gays in the military and fight attempts to eliminate anti-gay discrimination in adoption, employment, housing, etc. To me this is basic, fundamental bigotry and discrimination. Not exactly a cause worth rallying around.
                    "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                    "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                    "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
                      From what I have read, the mayors are using zoning to justify their positions and I believe the Boston mayor backed down on that front but the Chicago mayor has not. This is the same logic used to keep adult-oriented businesses and all but a tiny handful of bars out of Utah County. Nobody seems to have a problem with it in those cases. But yes, you got me there. I think the mayors are wrong. Yet, I have seen very few people focus on that. Most of the discussion I have seen has been in response to overall criticism of CFA and talk of a boycott. I am surprised how many people think that any kind of criticism or backlash to perceived bigotry is an infringement of free speech. I suppose they are taking their cue from Sarah Palin:

                      And by the way, this is not just a gay marriage issue. From what I understand, CFA donates heavily to groups that work to reinstate the ban on gays in the military and fight attempts to eliminate anti-gay discrimination in adoption, employment, housing, etc. To me this is basic, fundamental bigotry and discrimination. Not exactly a cause worth rallying around.
                      Thanks. I've enjoyed reading your posts on this. I think the whole situation is overblown, on both sides. I think the people lining up behind Chik-Fil-A will one day be looked upon in like manner as the people that lined up to protest desegregation and civil rights, on the wrong side of history.
                      Don't worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are any good, you'll have to ram them down people's throats.
                      - Howard Aiken

                      Any sufficiently complicated platform contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of a functional programming language.
                      - Variation on Greenspun's Tenth Rule

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
                        This is the same logic used to keep adult-oriented businesses and all but a tiny handful of bars out of Utah County. Nobody seems to have a problem with it in those cases.
                        The same logic because the cases are analogous? Interesting take.
                        "I'm anti, can't no government handle a commando / Your man don't want it, Trump's a bitch! I'll make his whole brand go under,"

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by TexTechCoug View Post
                          The whole thing is nonsense, minus politicians using their political power to threaten someone's business because he spoke his mind.

                          As to your "gay" analogy, I wonder how many outspoken 1st amendment touting homosexuals were out in support of CFA?
                          Possibly this guy.

                          http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-823655?hpt=hp_bn1
                          τὸν ἥλιον ἀνατέλλοντα πλείονες ἢ δυόμενον προσκυνοῦσιν

                          Comment


                          • Interesting essay on the CFA issue:

                            http://www.owldolatrous.com/?p=288

                            Please think about this: How would you feel if KFC came out tomorrow and said they were spending money against equality for Asian Americans, or African Americans, or religious people? Really. Think about it. What would you do? How would you feel? How would you feel if, after their announcement, there was a big increase in KFC sales and I was all over Facebook supporting KFC.
                            "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                            "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                            "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                            Comment


                            • So is Chick Fil A spending money on anti-gay causes or is it just their owner?
                              "I'm anti, can't no government handle a commando / Your man don't want it, Trump's a bitch! I'll make his whole brand go under,"

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
                                And by the way, this is not just a gay marriage issue. From what I understand, CFA donates heavily to groups that work to reinstate the ban on gays in the military and fight attempts to eliminate anti-gay discrimination in adoption, employment, housing, etc. To me this is basic, fundamental bigotry and discrimination. Not exactly a cause worth rallying around.
                                I find myself mostly just feeling saddened by all this. Some good things have happened in Utah lately to at least raise the level of hope for individuals in the Utah/LDS culture who are LGB. It's sad to me that after yesterday, those few recent good things (the panel at BYU, the support in the SLC pride parade, the YouTube video, etc.) just got dominated by freakin' chicken on a bun. It's the kind of reality that hits you in the face...albeit with a pickle and some waffle fries.

                                And don't even get me started on everyone yelling about how this isn't about bigotry or gays or even gay marriage, but about free speech. I believe that's the whole story for a handful of people here and there who were at CFA yesterday....the rest of them are all seriously self-deceived.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X