what a bunch of freaking vultures: siblings of josh powell seeking $3.5mm of susan and her boys' life insurance proceeds
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Josh Powell just blew up his house with his kids inside
Collapse
X
-
Technically (according to the article) they are entitled to it. Josh Powell changed the beneficiary from himself to his siblings. It is the Cox family that is fighting it.Originally posted by camleish View Postwhat a bunch of freaking vultures: siblings of josh powell seeking $3.5mm of susan and her boys' life insurance proceeds
That is a lot of money in life insurance. I am surprised that they had that much."Friendship is the grand fundamental principle of Mormonism" - Joseph Smith Jr.
Comment
-
ah, that wasn't originally in the article. it makes it less egregious that they're not suing for it, but it's still pretty sickening.Originally posted by Sullyute View PostTechnically (according to the article) they are entitled to it. Josh Powell changed the beneficiary from himself to his siblings. It is the Cox family that is fighting it.
That is a lot of money in life insurance. I am surprised that they had that much.Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est.
Comment
-
Who takes out life insurance on their kids?Originally posted by Sullyute View PostTechnically (according to the article) they are entitled to it. Josh Powell changed the beneficiary from himself to his siblings. It is the Cox family that is fighting it.
That is a lot of money in life insurance. I am surprised that they had that much.
Comment
-
I met a guy the other day who claimed to have been Josh Powell's best friend growing up. Said he had to leave the state to work for about 3 months because he mistakenly spoke to the media. And that he could "write a book" and has been offered 500K to do so based on stuff he knows that the cops or the true crime writer currently writing one doesn't.
Could be FOS but it was interesting nonetheless."It's true that everything happens for a reason. Just remember that sometimes that reason is that you did something really, really, stupid."
Comment
-
I think that it is relatively common (and inexpensive) to take out a small amount of life insurance on children in order to cover funeral expeneses, etc in the case of death. My work offers it on my dependants. But it would usually be less than $10,000. A million dollar policy seems suspicious.Originally posted by RC Vikings View PostWho takes out life insurance on their kids?"Friendship is the grand fundamental principle of Mormonism" - Joseph Smith Jr.
Comment
-
I'm curious how much Josh had on each life. I don't have a lot of experience with juvenile insurance (ages 0 to 18), but I think you'd be hard pressed to get coverage in excess of $100K because their deaths simply would not represent that much of a financial loss nor would their funeral expenses be that high.Originally posted by Sullyute View PostTechnically (according to the article) they are entitled to it. Josh Powell changed the beneficiary from himself to his siblings. It is the Cox family that is fighting it.
That is a lot of money in life insurance. I am surprised that they had that much.
If Susan worked, he might have been able to get a large amount of coverage, depending on various factors, but $3M is probably pushing it.
Typically underwriters do both health and financial underwriting because they aren't going to issue a $100M policy on someone that makes $25K a year, even assuming they actually had the money on hand to pay the premiums. I'm wondering if he got a bunch of smaller policies with multiple insurers and managed to keep under their radar in terms of his total insurance on their lives. Again, I'm not clear on what insurers do to mitigate that kind of "overinsured" risk.
As for whether the Cox's can contest the payout to the beneficiaries, I think they are SOL on that one.
Comment
-
Powell's sibling deserve nothing, even if they are the beneficiaries because their brother is a lying, homicidal POS.
A question - can a life insurance company deny payment to the beneficiaries if the deaths were the result of murder by the one who bought the policy?"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill
"I only know what I hear on the news." - Dear Leader
Comment
-
I'm no lawyer, but a quick browse on the topic shows that courts have ruled in favor of contingent beneficiaries (eg. Josh's siblings) even when the primary beneficiary is guilty of killing the insured.Originally posted by il Padrino Ute View PostPowell's sibling deserve nothing, even if they are the beneficiaries because their brother is a lying, homicidal POS.
A question - can a life insurance company deny payment to the beneficiaries if the deaths were the result of murder by the one who bought the policy?
If the murders occurred within the 2 year contestability period, it's possible the insurance company could deny the claims in their entirety and benefits would be paid to no one.
Just my $0.02 as someone without a law degree.
Comment
Comment