https://www.abc4.com/news/politics/i...anel-advances/
The Utah Bar is largely opposed to most of the bills out there affecting the legislature. What we don't need (and the Utah Supreme Court and the bar has acknowledged this) is more Supreme Court justices. What we do need more district court judges and domestic relations commissioners. That is where the bottle neck is right now. In Utah County right now, you file a motion for a hearing before a Commissioner and you are lucky to get a hearing within 60 days. You might be 3-months out or more. Judges and Commissioners need more support staff.
On the "Constitutional Court"
We oppose this bill because it raises serious concerns about judicial independence by allowing the executive and legislative branches to appoint judges who may later hear cases involving those same branches. This bill fundamentally restructures how constitutional challenges to Utah laws are handled by centralizing them in a new, statewide trial court and limiting the ability of individual judges or local courts to block state laws through injunctions. The bill also diverts taxpayer dollars and limited judicial resources to create a new court structure that is unnecessary and risks undermining public confidence in the judiciary.
Proposing 67% for retention elections is insane. You are going to create a revolving door of judges.
Leave a comment: